Words fail: just WHAT? have we had *Selected* for 'us' ?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #17,592 by Ashton 11/9/01 5:31:46 PM Reply	Words fail: just WHAT? have we had Selected for 'us' ? If this is not reversed soon.. worse, if this proves a Popular move via polls n'stuff: \ufffd Would you rather be a Freedom-loving Patriot and support THIS policy? (Also: mention any friends who.. might not, BTW) \ufffd Or would you prefer to be a Terrorist-loving Fifth Columnist, ready to see goose-stepping Afghan Black Shirts raping your sons and daughters for Allah? Check ONE Robespierre - where Are you when we need your firm judicial hand? (Oh.. you're here already) November 9, 2001 - a date which shall live in infamy in Law Schools of the future (should there be any of those). Would have been more appropriate if announced 11/11/01 (?)
Post #17,615 by Brandioch 11/9/01 7:13:00 PM Reply	You sound surprised. I don't understand why. :)
Post #17,619 by Ashton 11/9/01 8:05:21 PM Reply	Only at the rapidity, the hubris. He s'posed to be 'smart'!?
Post #17,622 by Brandioch 11/9/01 9:46:23 PM Reply	He is. This is the perfect time for it. Another chance like this might not come along for another hundred years or more. Strike while the iron is hot.
Post #17,637 by Ashton 11/9/01 11:42:56 PM Reply	Er which 'next hundred years'?________Optimist.

Ashcroft too see how much he can violate constitution - (JayMehaffey) - (5) - Nov. 9, 2001, 05:01:26 PM EST

Words fail: just WHAT? have we had *Selected* for 'us' ? - (Ashton) - (4) - Nov. 9, 2001, 05:31:46 PM EST

You sound surprised. - (Brandioch) - (3) - Nov. 9, 2001, 07:13:00 PM EST

Only at the rapidity, the hubris. He s'posed to be 'smart'!? -NT - (Ashton) - (2) - Nov. 9, 2001, 08:05:21 PM EST

He is. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Nov. 9, 2001, 09:46:23 PM EST

Er which 'next hundred years'?________Optimist. -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 9, 2001, 11:42:56 PM EST

Boy, isn't that true about damn near any subject?
42 ms