Yet Another Way To Do It

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #172,974

by ben_tilly

9/7/04 3:18:43 PM

Yet Another Way To Do It

Scoop out the body of the block into a function. That does not nest deeply.

Then structure as jb4 suggested.

Disadvantages: function call overhead and one layer of indirection. Advantages: separating "what" from "why" often leads to better modularization.

Cheers,
Ben

To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]

VB - NO CONTINUE STATEMENT!! ARRGG!!! - (broomberg) - (38) - Sept. 6, 2004, 02:40:04 PM EDT

Basic was invented that way - (ChrisR) - (16) - Sept. 6, 2004, 02:52:15 PM EDT

Has had "continue" for many years - (broomberg) - (15) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:07:04 PM EDT

In VB 6 you have - (lincoln) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:17:01 PM EDT

Exit loop is there - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 12:12:00 AM EDT

Or you COULD... - (jb4) - (12) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:47:59 AM EDT

In other words, give a "break"! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 7, 2004, 12:33:16 PM EDT

No way! - (broomberg) - (10) - Sept. 7, 2004, 01:37:24 PM EDT

Yet Another Way To Do It - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:18:43 PM EDT

Warning! Possible religious war pending - (jb4) - (8) - Sept. 8, 2004, 01:34:54 PM EDT

Nah, this is more important - (broomberg) - (7) - Sept. 8, 2004, 02:53:39 PM EDT

Some older languages had those constructs - (jb4) - (6) - Sept. 13, 2004, 06:09:03 PM EDT

That doesn't need to be addressed - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Sept. 13, 2004, 06:43:27 PM EDT

If I didn't know better ... - (drewk) - (3) - Sept. 13, 2004, 10:40:51 PM EDT

Good thing that you know better then :-) - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:21:30 AM EDT

You forgot: - (jb4) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 04:34:57 PM EDT

Rules of thumb are rules of thumb - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 14, 2004, 05:32:55 PM EDT

That'd be the Cyclomatic Complexity - (jb4) - Sept. 14, 2004, 04:28:48 PM EDT

Answer: - (FuManChu) - (17) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:23:49 PM EDT

VB is not a Programming Language, it's a Product. -NT - (ChrisR) - (16) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:25:21 PM EDT

So if I WAS to fight, again, what are my alternatives? - (broomberg) - (15) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:14:48 PM EDT

Rython ror Rerl ror Reecee-ell ror a rombo of rall rhree ; - (folkert) - (7) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:36:14 PM EDT

TCL - Never!!!! - (broomberg) - (6) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:45:03 PM EDT

Careful what you ask for... - (folkert) - (2) - Sept. 6, 2004, 07:51:30 PM EDT

I see you ignored the previous. Barry - (folkert) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 02:40:14 PM EDT

Who says? - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:34:48 PM EDT

Come on, TCL and BASIC are as far apart - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Sept. 7, 2004, 02:54:32 PM EDT

Lisp is not procedural?? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:16:37 PM EDT

Parenthetically speaking that is. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:56:42 PM EDT

C# is a better match - (ChrisR) - Sept. 6, 2004, 05:13:52 PM EDT

ObCRC: Delphi - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 6, 2004, 06:15:02 PM EDT

I just pitched C# - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 06:43:11 PM EDT

You just described all of MS' programming languages. - (static) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:27:32 PM EDT

Python wins on several of those axes - (FuManChu) - Sept. 6, 2004, 09:15:54 PM EDT

Sounds exactly like... - (jb4) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:51:07 AM EDT

Oh, what's the use?! "Nobody is as blind...", and so on. :-( -NT - (CRConrad) - Sept. 8, 2004, 07:18:30 AM EDT

Side effect - (JayMehaffey) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:31:44 PM EDT

FWIW, VB.Net 2005 will have it -NT - (altmann) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:26:30 PM EDT

ObLRPD: It'll be in the next release.... -NT - (jb4) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:53:28 AM EDT

iwethey.org

*nog*
102 ms