FWIW, VB.Net 2005 will have it

Post #172,885

by altmann

9/6/04 8:26:30 PM

--
Chris Altmann

Post #172,935

by jb4

9/7/04 11:53:28 AM

ObLRPD: It'll be in the next release....

jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

VB - NO CONTINUE STATEMENT!! ARRGG!!! - (broomberg) - (38) - Sept. 6, 2004, 02:40:04 PM EDT

Basic was invented that way - (ChrisR) - (16) - Sept. 6, 2004, 02:52:15 PM EDT

Has had "continue" for many years - (broomberg) - (15) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:07:04 PM EDT

In VB 6 you have - (lincoln) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:17:01 PM EDT

Exit loop is there - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 12:12:00 AM EDT

Or you COULD... - (jb4) - (12) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:47:59 AM EDT

In other words, give a "break"! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 7, 2004, 12:33:16 PM EDT

No way! - (broomberg) - (10) - Sept. 7, 2004, 01:37:24 PM EDT

Yet Another Way To Do It - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:18:43 PM EDT

Warning! Possible religious war pending - (jb4) - (8) - Sept. 8, 2004, 01:34:54 PM EDT

Nah, this is more important - (broomberg) - (7) - Sept. 8, 2004, 02:53:39 PM EDT

Some older languages had those constructs - (jb4) - (6) - Sept. 13, 2004, 06:09:03 PM EDT

That doesn't need to be addressed - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Sept. 13, 2004, 06:43:27 PM EDT

If I didn't know better ... - (drewk) - (3) - Sept. 13, 2004, 10:40:51 PM EDT

Good thing that you know better then :-) - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 14, 2004, 12:21:30 AM EDT

You forgot: - (jb4) - (1) - Sept. 14, 2004, 04:34:57 PM EDT

Rules of thumb are rules of thumb - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 14, 2004, 05:32:55 PM EDT

That'd be the Cyclomatic Complexity - (jb4) - Sept. 14, 2004, 04:28:48 PM EDT

Answer: - (FuManChu) - (17) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:23:49 PM EDT

VB is not a Programming Language, it's a Product. -NT - (ChrisR) - (16) - Sept. 6, 2004, 03:25:21 PM EDT

So if I WAS to fight, again, what are my alternatives? - (broomberg) - (15) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:14:48 PM EDT

Rython ror Rerl ror Reecee-ell ror a rombo of rall rhree ; - (folkert) - (7) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:36:14 PM EDT

TCL - Never!!!! - (broomberg) - (6) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:45:03 PM EDT

Careful what you ask for... - (folkert) - (2) - Sept. 6, 2004, 07:51:30 PM EDT

I see you ignored the previous. Barry - (folkert) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 02:40:14 PM EDT

Who says? - (broomberg) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:34:48 PM EDT

Come on, TCL and BASIC are as far apart - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Sept. 7, 2004, 02:54:32 PM EDT

Lisp is not procedural?? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:16:37 PM EDT

Parenthetically speaking that is. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 7, 2004, 03:56:42 PM EDT

C# is a better match - (ChrisR) - Sept. 6, 2004, 05:13:52 PM EDT

ObCRC: Delphi - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 6, 2004, 06:15:02 PM EDT

I just pitched C# - (broomberg) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 06:43:11 PM EDT

You just described all of MS' programming languages. - (static) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:27:32 PM EDT

Python wins on several of those axes - (FuManChu) - Sept. 6, 2004, 09:15:54 PM EDT

Sounds exactly like... - (jb4) - (1) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:51:07 AM EDT

Oh, what's the use?! "Nobody is as blind...", and so on. :-( -NT - (CRConrad) - Sept. 8, 2004, 07:18:30 AM EDT

Side effect - (JayMehaffey) - Sept. 6, 2004, 04:31:44 PM EDT

FWIW, VB.Net 2005 will have it -NT - (altmann) - (1) - Sept. 6, 2004, 08:26:30 PM EDT

ObLRPD: It'll be in the next release.... -NT - (jb4) - Sept. 7, 2004, 11:53:28 AM EDT

Welcome to IWETHEY!