IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Rython ror Rerl ror Reecee-ell ror a rombo of rall rhree ;
Or not in Scooby-doese

Python or Perl or Tcl or a combo of all three.

From Active State for commercial support or not. Since it is Perl, python and tcl.
Active [link|http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActivePerlFamily/?_x=1|Perl], [link|http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActivePythonFamily/?_x=1|Python]. [link|http://www.activestate.com/Products/ActiveTclFamily/?_x=1|Tcl]

[link|http://www.python.org/windows/|Python for Windows] and the [link|http://www.python.org/download/|the download location]

[link|http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/|Tcl for Windows and other OS] and the [link|http://www.tcl.tk/software/tcltk/downloadnow84.tml|Download instruction]. The Binary for Windows is Active State Tcl.

--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New TCL - Never!!!!
Worse than BASIC to me.

Last time I looks at AS Perl it felt like a hack. The GUI port felt like a bag on the side. Maybe I didn't give it enough time.

Python is probably worth a look. But if I was really learning a new OO language I'd want to do Ruby. Oh well.
New Careful what you ask for...
[link|http://rubyinstaller.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl|You might just get it!]

[link|http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=167|More specifically the download]

Sheesh... Pokey today?
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New I see you ignored the previous. Barry
You asked for it, I showed it to you...

Bahaha.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
Here is an example: [link|http://www.greymagic.com/security/advisories/gm001-ie/|Executing arbitrary commands without Active Scripting or ActiveX when using Windows]
New Who says?
I downloaded it, installed, and have started reading the manual on my laptop.

That doesn't mean I'm going to give up what I have produced so far. It is deployable right now. And I am in the process of rewriting it in C# as we speak.

I consider the Ruby more of a long term thing for me to wrap my mind around. I'd have to fight for a non-MS solution right now. C# is an easy sell. So if I take a day to rewrite in C#, since the tools and functions map to the VB I just did, it is an immediate win.
New Come on, TCL and BASIC are as far apart
as two procedural languages can be (ok, Fortran and Lisp are further apart, but you're not likely to use either, and Lisp is not procedural).

TCL has (almost) no syntax. That alone makes it worthy of respect. BASIC is all syntax. Bleech.

--

... a reference to Presidente Arbusto.
-- [link|http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001417.html|Geoffrey K. Pullum]
New Lisp is not procedural??
Lisp can be used in as procedural a way as you want. Just use setq for assignment.

You don't have to use it that way. Many people don't. But you can.

:-P

Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
New Parenthetically speaking that is. :)
Alex

"If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words." -- Philip K. Dick, US science fiction writer
     VB - NO CONTINUE STATEMENT!! ARRGG!!! - (broomberg) - (38)
         Basic was invented that way - (ChrisR) - (16)
             Has had "continue" for many years - (broomberg) - (15)
                 In VB 6 you have - (lincoln) - (1)
                     Exit loop is there - (broomberg)
                 Or you COULD... - (jb4) - (12)
                     In other words, give a "break"! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                     No way! - (broomberg) - (10)
                         Yet Another Way To Do It - (ben_tilly)
                         Warning! Possible religious war pending - (jb4) - (8)
                             Nah, this is more important - (broomberg) - (7)
                                 Some older languages had those constructs - (jb4) - (6)
                                     That doesn't need to be addressed - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                                         If I didn't know better ... - (drewk) - (3)
                                             Good thing that you know better then :-) - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                 You forgot: - (jb4) - (1)
                                                     Rules of thumb are rules of thumb - (ben_tilly)
                                         That'd be the Cyclomatic Complexity - (jb4)
         Answer: - (FuManChu) - (17)
             VB is not a Programming Language, it's a Product. -NT - (ChrisR) - (16)
                 So if I WAS to fight, again, what are my alternatives? - (broomberg) - (15)
                     Rython ror Rerl ror Reecee-ell ror a rombo of rall rhree ; - (folkert) - (7)
                         TCL - Never!!!! - (broomberg) - (6)
                             Careful what you ask for... - (folkert) - (2)
                                 I see you ignored the previous. Barry - (folkert) - (1)
                                     Who says? - (broomberg)
                             Come on, TCL and BASIC are as far apart - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                                 Lisp is not procedural?? - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                     Parenthetically speaking that is. :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                     C# is a better match - (ChrisR)
                     ObCRC: Delphi - (Another Scott) - (2)
                         I just pitched C# - (broomberg) - (1)
                             You just described all of MS' programming languages. - (static)
                     Python wins on several of those axes - (FuManChu)
                     Sounds exactly like... - (jb4) - (1)
                         Oh, what's the use?! "Nobody is as blind...", and so on. :-( -NT - (CRConrad)
         Side effect - (JayMehaffey)
         FWIW, VB.Net 2005 will have it -NT - (altmann) - (1)
             ObLRPD: It'll be in the next release.... -NT - (jb4)

Beats turning True Believers into Soylent Green. Doesn't it?
113 ms