IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Theory and Practice of Programming Forum
/
"Expressive", not "pithy" :)
Post #172,046
by
Arkadiy
8/31/04 6:59:29 PM
Reply
"Expressive", not "pithy" :)
"pithy" I guess would be better translated as poisonous, ядовитый - it's an idiomatic usage.
--
"...was poorly, lugubrious and intoxicated."
-- Patrick O'Brian, "Master and Commander"
Post #172,047
by
deSitter
8/31/04 7:03:32 PM
Reply
Re: "Expressive", not "pithy" :)
Why can I see your Cyrillic but not mine? Some encoding mojo?
-drl
Post #172,172
by
Arkadiy
9/1/04 9:33:56 AM
Reply
Dunno.
I see yours fine in Mozilla on Win 2000 after I select the proper code page - Cyrillic Windows-1251
--
"...was poorly, lugubrious and intoxicated."
-- Patrick O'Brian, "Master and Commander"
What is with gcc, anyway?!?
- (
jb4
)
- (52)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 06:07:59 PM EDT
What is typeof(0x80000000)?
- (
ChrisR
)
- (7)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 06:25:16 PM EDT
right, add an L
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- (6)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 06:30:08 PM EDT
Ain't that a UL
- (
ChrisR
)
- (5)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 06:34:49 PM EDT
This is why C is sometimes called "high-level assembler."
- (
static
)
- (1)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 09:11:16 PM EDT
Re: This is why C is sometimes called "high-level assembler.
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 09:35:47 AM EDT
Actually, that would be a U (or u)
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 09:43:22 AM EDT
What about casting the values?
- (
ChrisR
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:34:46 AM EDT
Yes, that was the solution I used
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:55:24 AM EDT
Re: What is with gcc, anyway?!?
- (
lordbeatnik
)
- (3)
- Aug. 26, 2004, 11:05:40 PM EDT
I guess...
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 09:39:19 AM EDT
If there was no ambiguity...
- (
lordbeatnik
)
- (1)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 06:51:20 PM EDT
For the next set of standards?
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 30, 2004, 05:29:20 PM EDT
Hex constants are assumed to be positive
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (36)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 11:32:17 AM EDT
Re: Hex constants are assumed to be positive
- (
jb4
)
- (35)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 01:15:45 PM EDT
Setting the high bit is processor dependent.
- (
hnick
)
- (34)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 01:27:28 PM EDT
OK, then the standard should be saying
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (33)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 01:53:36 PM EDT
No I actually write code based on them
- (
jb4
)
- (30)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 02:27:25 PM EDT
Ignore them and use my common sence
-NT
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (29)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 03:24:32 PM EDT
I'll bet debugging your code is a real joy...
- (
jb4
)
- (28)
- Aug. 30, 2004, 05:29:56 PM EDT
Nope
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (27)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 10:04:06 AM EDT
And so tell me, O Oracle of Common Sence [sic]
- (
jb4
)
- (26)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:04:10 AM EDT
offensive foul, ball to Ark
- (
deSitter
)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:10:45 AM EDT
Rest assured,
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:17:52 AM EDT
:) ok
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:25:55 AM EDT
OK, OK...
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:26:59 AM EDT
Well, while the tone is disagreable, the question is
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (21)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:14:05 AM EDT
Point missed.
- (
jb4
)
- (20)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:25:35 AM EDT
If C were sane, TRUE = -1 and problem vanishes
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- (7)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:26:40 AM EDT
Ermm...say What?
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:28:42 AM EDT
Re: Ermm...say What?
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:37:26 AM EDT
Much like Jewish law
- (
Arkadiy
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:43:34 AM EDT
So you prefer how VB does it??
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 01:01:31 PM EDT
Point: Ben...
-NT
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 01:04:18 PM EDT
How it used to do it.
- (
ChrisR
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 01:47:19 PM EDT
Hehee!
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 03:18:32 PM EDT
Why do you expect hex to be treated differently from decimal
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (11)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:32:44 AM EDT
Re: Why do you expect hex to be treated differently
- (
deSitter
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:42:16 AM EDT
Man, that's a good question!
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 12:37:46 PM EDT
Now that's clarity!
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (8)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 04:42:17 PM EDT
Nope, it's bad math
- (
deSitter
)
- (7)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 05:00:03 PM EDT
But, counters of real things don't need negative values.
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (6)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 05:19:13 PM EDT
I'd like to add a negative number of votes for Bush. ;-)
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 05:20:08 PM EDT
That only works on Diebold machines. :)
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 05:23:34 PM EDT
Certainly
- (
deSitter
)
- (3)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 05:21:51 PM EDT
"Expressive", not "pithy" :)
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (2)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 06:59:29 PM EDT
Re: "Expressive", not "pithy" :)
- (
deSitter
)
- (1)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 07:03:32 PM EDT
Dunno.
- (
Arkadiy
)
- Sept. 1, 2004, 09:33:56 AM EDT
Wasn't trying to piss you off...
- (
hnick
)
- (1)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 04:06:40 PM EDT
Interesting assumption:
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 30, 2004, 05:51:55 PM EDT
Hmm...while the datatype will be first reached,
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (1)
- Aug. 27, 2004, 05:35:03 PM EDT
True, but...
- (
jb4
)
- Aug. 30, 2004, 05:55:52 PM EDT
Re: What is with gcc, anyway?!?
- (
gdaustin
)
- Aug. 31, 2004, 11:10:58 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
Powered by prairie dogs!
66 ms