Because I suspect something I cannot prove?

Because you've blamed Bush, despite having been shown proof that Bush has had nothing to do with 2 prior settlements, and I claim at least 2 more tha I didn't link to.

Now, yes, Bush has control of the AG, and presumably he could keep them from attempting a stupid settlement. But you've said that "since Bush was elected" - despite the SAME EXACT issue being pursued EXACTLY THE SAME.

What the hell *else* is that but utter bigotry? "Its all Bush's fault".

This settlement is being treated differently than the others. By the press, and by the States.

Not from what I can tell. DoJ made a stupid proposal, doesn't affect MS, press reported it, some ridiculed it, states balked. 2 priors in this thread of EXACTLY this behavior.

*WHAT* is different?

Addison