IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Windows vX.X Forum / I assume you meant these
Post #170,615
by broomberg
8/22/04 8:42:52 AM
Reply
New I assume you meant these
[link|http://www.radsoft.net/products/|http://www.radsoft.net/products/]

No wonder you are so paranoid. You actively watch those out to get you.
Post #170,677
by Ashton
8/22/04 11:09:42 PM
Reply
New It might seem so - but:
Nowadays I use a small fraction of any tools and, rarely; it just isn't worth it to imagine you're going to "find out all you need to know" to keep a Doze system walking. That is the full meaning of, dynamic irreproducibility (or, nondeterminate) as I have experienced it. (OK - for someone like Andrew and a few, revise that. But sans that lengthy experience, all kept in a mind.. never mind.)

Yeah.. once I thought a bunch of notes, logs, utils and stuff could help. And sometimes the utils do. Not Worth the Time in 20/20. KISS is all I'll trust re any Billyware whatsoever. I cannot Imagine trusting a Company to this crap - one need not be a coder to recognize built-in badness, though I suppose it helps to tabulate and correlate a few of the underlying reasons.

Or does it? knowing that Nothing will be done / Can be done to make this POS network at 5-Nines AND be legacy-compatible. Last I heard..


Other-tech Ex:

The famous Victoreen "Area Monitor" - a lab wall-mount geiger counter with settable alarm window and a gawdawful mini-klaxon - was a straightforward early-transistorized monitor, seen/heard! in many movies, etc.

Have one downstairs: an interstage xfmr had shorted turn-turn, and on the exact day after Chernobyl!
(Looking for fallout - had another counter, though)

No parts for eons, but it is a Classic Thing.
I had to unwind and measure length of the 32-AWG? fine-wire == far better than imagining a turns-count! I suppose that I might someday rewind the sucker; at least that is a Known route to restoration.

With Doze: there IS no 'known route', once past the trivial. That millions have accepted this - proves the onset of species-dumbth, all by itself.


moi
and.. Lucky You!
     MS Telnet server - (broomberg) - (26) - Aug. 20, 2004, 02:22:19 PM EDT
         What is your TERM set as? - (folkert) - (25) - Aug. 20, 2004, 02:42:06 PM EDT
             what greg said or ansi -NT - (boxley) - Aug. 20, 2004, 02:46:03 PM EDT
             Doesn't matter - (broomberg) - (23) - Aug. 20, 2004, 02:51:42 PM EDT
                 Doesn't cygwin include a telnet server? -NT - (ben_tilly) - (18) - Aug. 20, 2004, 03:05:34 PM EDT
                     I use sshd from cygwin -NT - (Arkadiy) - Aug. 20, 2004, 03:26:04 PM EDT
                     Probably. - (broomberg) - (16) - Aug. 20, 2004, 08:54:35 PM EDT
                         So you paid money to avoid putting free stuff on? - (ben_tilly) - (15) - Aug. 20, 2004, 09:08:39 PM EDT
                             Yes - (broomberg) - (1) - Aug. 20, 2004, 10:27:47 PM EDT
                                 Agreed. - (pwhysall) - Aug. 20, 2004, 10:38:22 PM EDT
                             Nope, I was wrong about the ssh server - (broomberg) - (12) - Aug. 21, 2004, 10:41:16 AM EDT
                                 No comment -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2004, 12:59:51 PM EDT
                                     WinSSHD - (broomberg) - Aug. 24, 2004, 06:37:00 AM EDT
                                 Should also ask what *X* server you put on Windows... - (folkert) - (9) - Aug. 21, 2004, 01:25:58 PM EDT
                                     Probably none. - (pwhysall) - (8) - Aug. 21, 2004, 01:49:04 PM EDT
                                         RightyO - (broomberg) - (7) - Aug. 21, 2004, 06:07:49 PM EDT
                                             Boggle.. - (Ashton) - (6) - Aug. 21, 2004, 06:35:38 PM EDT
                                                 Yup. No Windows. - (broomberg) - (3) - Aug. 21, 2004, 07:28:24 PM EDT
                                                     Wow.. - (Ashton) - (2) - Aug. 22, 2004, 06:34:06 AM EDT
                                                         Part of it's age - (jake123) - (1) - Aug. 22, 2004, 11:23:08 AM EDT
                                                             Makes sense; newbies get the full brunt, then. -NT - (Ashton) - Aug. 22, 2004, 11:34:37 PM EDT
                                                 I assume you meant these - (broomberg) - (1) - Aug. 22, 2004, 08:42:52 AM EDT
                                                     It might seem so - but: - (Ashton) - Aug. 22, 2004, 11:09:42 PM EDT
                 Putty est votre ami - (deSitter) - (3) - Aug. 20, 2004, 03:28:09 PM EDT
                     Huh? - (broomberg) - (2) - Aug. 20, 2004, 08:50:22 PM EDT
                         Re: Huh? - (deSitter) - (1) - Aug. 22, 2004, 03:57:41 PM EDT
                             Slow has nothing to do with it - (broomberg) - Aug. 22, 2004, 04:45:08 PM EDT

I love RedBrick, it's the only database I've met than can consistently give different results for
Select count(*) from table
versus
select count(*) from table where 1=1
90 ms