Loaded question, with a bad answer
Do you still think that we should have left Saddam in power and never entered Iraq?
Yes. During the past decades the US supported his regime. We had no reason for the unprovoked attack. We ignored the brutality of his regime and supplied him with the necessary tools to BE a brutal dictator. Bad intelligence or good intelligence. Doesn't matter. We had pledged to WAIT until consenses was built. Meaning UN. Bush saw that he wasn't going to get the ok to attack, so he did it ON HIS OWN. IT WAS WRONG to attack.
If so, then you support a brutal terrorist dictator, and feel that men like him should be left alone to mismanage and misrule their own parts of the world.
Do I support Saddam, nope. But he is the ruler of his country. Does any country support Bush? Nope, but none will attack just because he is a raging lunatic bent on destroying his own country. When will any country attack to save us from Bush?
Lastly, get off the old, tired, wrong, thread that Saddam and OBL were buddies in planning. The two of them have as much in common as Tim McVeigh and Saddam. McVeigh and OBL have more in common, both attacked the US.
