is that we have TWO questions, really, not one.
First question: Was Bush justified in sending us to Iraq?
Answer: No, because there were no weapons of mass destruction found, and that was why he said we had to attack.
Second question: Did it do any good to invade Iraq?
Answer: Yes, it toppled Saddam, freed an oppressed people, and gave a country a chance to have a more civilized government.
Was it wrong? Depends. Was what Bush said wrong? Yes. There were no WMDs. Was it wrong for the Iraqi people? They'd probably say no, they are liberated.
But was it RIGHT for Bush to tell us one reason to invade, and then we find that the reason didn't exist?
No.
Nightowl >8#