IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Was asked a question out of my league
My friend in the Phillippines asked me to describe the basic differences between Democrat and Republican philosophy to her.

I know that Democrats are liberal and Republicans are conservative (I hope I don't have that mixed up, do I?) I get confused about left and right, I never got that connotation.

At any rate, can someone direct me to a NEUTRAL site that just outlines the basic philosophy of each party? Searching on either party only gives me that party, how could I find a comparison?

Thanks in advance for any help on this.

Nightowl >8#




Note to self: Find new signature soon.
New It would require a book - will try later
-drl
New The party morphs depending on who's running.
E.g. the platforms mostly get written by whoever the Presidential candidate is.

As related [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=165885|here], the parties have switched sides over time.

The best thing to do is probably point your friend to Bush's and Kerry's web sites and let them browse around.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
Expand Edited by Another Scott Aug. 4, 2004, 12:16:54 PM EDT
New Not sure she wants Bush/Kerry
She asked about the parties in general.

Does each "party" have an official website?

Nightowl >8#



Note to self: Find new signature soon.
New Yes. GIYF. ;-)
[link|http://www.google.com/search?q=democratic+party+republican+party&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8|Google Is Your Friend].

Cheers,
Scott.
New Okay, but
I know how to google, but how do I know which is the OFFICIAL site? I don't want just any site. Is there something that defines the official ones?

Thanks

Brenda

Edit: I looked at the GOP Republican site, but it just talks about BUSH again, and slams Kerry. I want to find a definition of the two parties, or their basic creeds, or something like that, that applies to now, with no biases. Wondering if that even exists?



Note to self: Find new signature soon.
Expand Edited by Nightowl Aug. 4, 2004, 01:47:42 PM EDT
New Click and Read is the best way.
The official sites are near the top (links 1 and 3 for me). rnc.org and democrats.org are the official sites.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Thanks, that helps..
As long as I can figure out a way to find the information unbiased.

Nightowl >8#

Edit: I don't think it's there. Man, this is hard. All I wanted was the differences in a nutshell to explain to her, and this is overwhelming, I don't even know how to begin, and I'm sure not sending her to these sites to get overwhelmed too.

Maybe I need something less complex, like a dictionary or encyclopedia definition of the parties.... I don't want the entire platform or rules, just the basic philosophies.

Man, now I know why I stayed away from reading about politics. This is dizzying.

Nightowl >8#



Note to self: Find new signature soon.
Expand Edited by Nightowl Aug. 4, 2004, 01:53:19 PM EDT
New There Is No Such Thing! as "unbiased". {sheesh}
New what you need is the party platform of both parties
this describes the America they beleive in as a political entity. Also realize that large chunks of both parties disagree with parts of their own platform. This should delineate what each beleives in of themselves as opposed to what each party beleives about the other party. (hopelessly muddled but that is politics) you also might want to check out the libertarian party as well as democratic socialist party for comparison.
thanx,
bill
"delayed incessantly by people whose prevalent qualification was an excess of free-time" Philip Atkinson
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Yeah, that's what I tried to tell her
I got the basic definitions from Britannica Encyclopeadia, and then explained to her that at times they switch around and one is more liberal or one is more conservative. But as a rule, the Republicans are the conservatives, right? and the Democrats are the liberals, or so I thought.

I also explained the basic stands on issues, i.e. Democrats are more for labor unions, minorities and progressive reformers, and Republicans are more for strong government and strong national defense. They had been for tax cuts, but then they made tax cuts, so that's where it got blurry.

I just get mixed up most about which is liberal/conservative and which is left/right. That is where I get hopelessly lost, but I think Democrats are the liberals. Haven't been able to validate that yet though, can anyone confirm it?

Nightowl >8#



Note to self: Find new signature soon.
New Don't bother becoming unconfused on that one
The definition of "liberal" has also changed definitions over time. To most people today it seems to mean that you want a welfare state. But historically, and to a lot of people still, it means that government should stay away from anything to do with business, and give people the liberty to do things however they want - including the right to screw it up if they so desire.

If you want a better understanding, read [link|http://www.newamerica.net/index.cfm?pg=article&DocID=44|America's Tribes]. What you'll find out is that newcomers have slotted themselves into a political scene based on a division from The Civil War. That is England's Civil War, not the much later US one (which just happened to be fought along the same fracture line).

Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
New In a nutshell!
Democrats generally favor the working class, the poor, the minorities, and are not afraid of taxing the wealthy and corporations. Democrats are very pro-Union.
Economically Democrats generally follow the Keynesian theory of economics. Which means they try to affect the demand side, feel that a little inflation is good, deficits are bad, tax cuts to the poor and middle-class, that due to the POT (Potential Of Thrift) that giving the wealthy money would not make them spend it or create new jobs, but instead save it. They believe in full employment and feel that unemployment is underrated. Keynesian economics helped get the country out of the depression, and created social programs. Democrats want a bigger government with more control.

Republcans generally favor the corporations, the wealthy (top 10%), they are afraid of taxing the wealthy and corporations. Republicans are anti-Union.
Economically Republicans generally follow the Classical theory of economics. Which means they try to affect the supply side, feel that inflation is bad, deficits are good, tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations, that saving is good and savings can be invested to create growth and fix unemployment. They feel that unemployment is overrated. Classical (or Supply Side aka Reaganomics) economics helped improve the economy in the 1980's when Ronald Reagan was in office. Some claim that part of Reaganomics are not true Classical economics, but Reagan did what he could to get congress to agree to his ideas. Republicans want a smaller government, and less government control, by removing regulations and let the economy or markets fix the problems. More of a hands off or lazie faire policy.

Notice I said generally, some politicians have a mix of ideas from both sides, or differ from these definitions in a nutshell.

Some Americans are in the middle like they could become a Moderate Centralist party member, but the Centralist party never quite took off, last I heard it was a Yahoo Group, and no offical web site was created. [link|http://groups.yahoo.com/group/centralistpartyofamerica/|http://groups.yahoo....stpartyofamerica/]



"When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in confederacy against him." - Jonathan Swift




[link|http://www.xormad.com:4096/district268|I am from District 268].
New The offical party line
Orion gave a fairly good summary of the parties offical posistion on economic issues.

But the reality does wander a bit from the offical posistion. The Democrats have not been very pro-union in recent years. And the Republicans have not done anything to reduce government in a long time. Now that the Republicans are in power, they don't talk about states rights much, and Democrats have moved to bringing the issue up at times.

Jay
New That's really good
What Orion wrote is really good, and similar to what I finally wrote my friend.

I agree though, the Republicans seem to favor more government controls on social issues, (i.e. Bush wanting to amend the constitution on gay marriage), and the Democrats have been a little less behind the unions. But that's the basic concepts, and she said she got it, so I think we're fine. :)

Thanks, guys.

Nightowl >8#



"A determined soul will do more with a rusty monkey wrench than a loafer will accomplish with all the tools in a machine shop." -- Robert Hughes, Australian Art Critic, Writer
New Agree. And book recommendation.
I heard the author on Charlie Rose a few weeks ago. I've not read this book, but judging by what he said on the show I watched, it's on my list.

[link|http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0805073396/qid=1091721047/sr=ka-1/ref=pd_ka_1/102-4481909-1062526|http://www.amazon.co...2-4481909-1062526]
bcnu,
Mikem

If you can read this, you are not the President.
New Hey! Nice Job, Norm!
jb4
shrub\ufffdbish (Am., from shrub + rubbish, after the derisive name for America's 43 president; 2003) n. 1. a form of nonsensical political doubletalk wherein the speaker attempts to defend the indefensible by lying, obfuscation, or otherwise misstating the facts; GIBBERISH. 2. any of a collection of utterances from America's putative 43rd president. cf. BULLSHIT

New Re: Was asked a question out of my league
Majority of Republicans

anti-abortion
anti-gay
want longer prison sentences
against rights of accused
against taxes on rich
anti-UN

Majority of Democrats

disagree with the above


A


Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
New so the dems are the disagreeable party?
"delayed incessantly by people whose prevalent qualification was an excess of free-time" Philip Atkinson
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New some things are worth disagreeing with
I am not a Democrat

they seem to be reactive to the Reps these days instead of having a plan
A
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
New well according to this insitght directly from John Kerry
found in my inbox this am
[link|http://www.johnkerry.com/plan/|http://www.johnkerry.com/plan/] he has a plan. Let me know what it is because I am too lazy to read it :-)
thanx,
bill
"delayed incessantly by people whose prevalent qualification was an excess of free-time" Philip Atkinson
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
     Was asked a question out of my league - (Nightowl) - (20)
         It would require a book - will try later -NT - (deSitter)
         The party morphs depending on who's running. - (Another Scott) - (6)
             Not sure she wants Bush/Kerry - (Nightowl) - (5)
                 Yes. GIYF. ;-) - (Another Scott) - (4)
                     Okay, but - (Nightowl) - (3)
                         Click and Read is the best way. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                             Thanks, that helps.. - (Nightowl) - (1)
                                 There Is No Such Thing! as "unbiased". {sheesh} -NT - (Ashton)
         what you need is the party platform of both parties - (boxley) - (2)
             Yeah, that's what I tried to tell her - (Nightowl) - (1)
                 Don't bother becoming unconfused on that one - (ben_tilly)
         In a nutshell! - (orion) - (4)
             The offical party line - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
                 That's really good - (Nightowl)
                 Agree. And book recommendation. - (mmoffitt)
             Hey! Nice Job, Norm! -NT - (jb4)
         Re: Was asked a question out of my league - (andread) - (3)
             so the dems are the disagreeable party? -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                 some things are worth disagreeing with - (andread) - (1)
                     well according to this insitght directly from John Kerry - (boxley)

Is it me, or is the band getting bigger?
130 ms