Ugly, but not a critical flaw

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #165,096 by ben_tilly 7/19/04 6:29:52 PM Reply	Ugly, but not a critical flaw To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #165,103 by JayMehaffey 7/19/04 8:24:52 PM Reply	Pretty much sums up C++
Post #165,104 by deSitter 7/19/04 8:41:14 PM Reply	It's totally against the original spirit It's like C++ consuming itself. A natural idiomatic expression turns out to be impossible. IIRC you can get around even this stupid requirement with nastycasting. -drl
Post #165,113 by tuberculosis 7/19/04 11:38:29 PM Reply	No, just pointlessly inconsistent Which makes for pointless wastes of time having to look up all the shit that doesn't work the way you'd think it ought to all the time. Democracies are not well-run nor long-preserved with secrecy and lies. --Walter Cronkite
Post #165,115 by deSitter 7/20/04 12:29:49 AM Reply	Re: No, just pointlessly inconsistent Definition of a good idiom: One that doesn't imply its own self-inflicted defeat. -drl

C++ - the stupidity continues - (tuberculosis) - (15) - July 19, 2004, 05:47:05 PM EDT

AHHHHH.... Good to see you posting... - (folkert) - July 19, 2004, 05:54:31 PM EDT

Good to see you again! - (Another Scott) - July 19, 2004, 05:54:50 PM EDT

TB hola brother! - (deSitter) - July 19, 2004, 05:55:27 PM EDT

They what? - (ben_tilly) - (10) - July 19, 2004, 06:03:00 PM EDT

Not quite - (tuberculosis) - (9) - July 19, 2004, 06:12:24 PM EDT

Ugly, but not a critical flaw -NT - (ben_tilly) - (4) - July 19, 2004, 06:29:52 PM EDT

Pretty much sums up C++ -NT - (JayMehaffey) - July 19, 2004, 08:24:52 PM EDT

It's totally against the original spirit - (deSitter) - July 19, 2004, 08:41:14 PM EDT

No, just pointlessly inconsistent - (tuberculosis) - (1) - July 19, 2004, 11:38:29 PM EDT

Re: No, just pointlessly inconsistent - (deSitter) - July 20, 2004, 12:29:49 AM EDT

Per Barney: - (jb4) - (3) - July 20, 2004, 11:48:04 AM EDT

It's stupid - (deSitter) - July 20, 2004, 11:54:06 AM EDT

No, I agree with the decision - (tuberculosis) - (1) - July 20, 2004, 01:55:04 PM EDT

Agreed...but...but... - (jb4) - July 20, 2004, 02:35:09 PM EDT

Hooray! Todd's back! :) -NT - (FuManChu) - July 19, 2004, 09:45:27 PM EDT

If you don't know, then I'm not allowed to tell you.
54 ms