OK...
Hand them a selection of the results from [link|http://search.us-cert.gov/query.html?rq=0&ht=0&qp=&qs=&qc=&pw=100%25&ws=1&la=&qm=0&st=1&nh=25&lk=1&rf=2&oq=&rq=0&si=1&qt=IE|http://search.us-cer...=&rq=0&si=1&qt=IE] and ask them to compare to [link|http://search.us-cert.gov/query.html?col=csalrts&col=csbulls&col=cstips&col=pressrm&col=tcsalrts&col=vulnotes&col=xtradocs&qt=Mozilla&charset=iso-8859-1|http://search.us-cer...harset=iso-8859-1] for themselves.
Any questions? :-)
Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
