"But rather"

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #16,116 by mmoffitt 11/1/01 7:16:57 PM Reply	"But rather" I >HATE< to see that. "But rather" is about as annoying to me as "most unique". Can no one speak the King's English in this cess pool anymore?
Post #16,117 by Ashton 11/1/01 7:26:34 PM Reply	or.. or 'all the myriad ways'?
Post #16,120 by Another Scott 11/1/01 7:56:11 PM Reply	Heh. He said "cess". :-) [link\|http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=cess\|Cess] is an interesting word. Cess to you! :-) I assume you meant [link\|http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=cesspool\|cesspool]. :-P Cheers, Scott. (A member of Pendants Anonymous. :-)
Post #16,163 by jb4 11/2/01 8:51:45 AM Reply	..Or "irregardless"... jb4 (Resistance is not futile...)
Post #16,171 by Silverlock 11/2/01 9:13:55 AM Reply	Or "Same difference" Don Richards, Proud recipient of the ABBA.
Post #16,174 by CRConrad 11/2/01 9:35:05 AM Reply	But that is (or at least used to be) intentional - a joke!
Post #16,175 by Silverlock 11/2/01 9:46:30 AM Reply	"used to be" is the operative portion of that statement Don Richards, Proud recipient of the ABBA.
Post #16,179 by CRConrad 11/2/01 11:03:45 AM Reply	So... Can we - those of us who know that - go on using it?
Post #16,180 by Silverlock 11/2/01 11:07:17 AM Reply	Yep. But only with those in the know. Don Richards, Proud recipient of the ABBA.
Post #16,251 by Ashton 11/2/01 3:33:19 PM Reply	Is it time for inflammable yet?

We have all misjudged The Beast - (Ashton) - (11) - Oct. 29, 2001, 08:10:31 PM EST

Have another glass of the KoolAid, Ashton -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 29, 2001, 09:11:17 PM EST

"But rather" - (mmoffitt) - (9) - Nov. 1, 2001, 07:16:57 PM EST

or.. or 'all the myriad ways'? -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 1, 2001, 07:26:34 PM EST

Heh. He said "cess". :-) - (Another Scott) - Nov. 1, 2001, 07:56:11 PM EST

..Or "irregardless"... -NT - (jb4) - (6) - Nov. 2, 2001, 08:51:45 AM EST

Or "Same difference" -NT - (Silverlock) - (5) - Nov. 2, 2001, 09:13:55 AM EST

But that is (or at least used to be) intentional - a *joke*! -NT - (CRConrad) - (4) - Nov. 2, 2001, 09:35:05 AM EST

"used to be" is the operative portion of that statement -NT - (Silverlock) - (3) - Nov. 2, 2001, 09:46:30 AM EST

So... Can we - those of us who *know* that - go on using it? -NT - (CRConrad) - (2) - Nov. 2, 2001, 11:03:45 AM EST

Yep. But only with those in the *know*. -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - Nov. 2, 2001, 11:07:17 AM EST

Is it time for *inflammable* yet? -NT - (Ashton) - Nov. 2, 2001, 03:33:19 PM EST

OK, this is why evolution is bunk. You're not smart enough to have evolved from anything.
142 ms