IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New By who's measure?
FreeBSD? OK.

Linux Distros in General is RIFE with Perl. Debian couldn't live without, RedHat uses it all over, Mandrake, let us not go there.

Where did you get this bit of info?
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

Heard near the SCOG employee entry/exit way:

  Security: We got another Mass Exodus Doorway Jam.
New Too obscure, I guess.
My understanding is that it's [link|http://www.perl.org/about/style-guide.html|Perl], not PERL.

I'll go slink away now....

Cheers,
Scott.
New Bah, figured it was a captalization slam
Some things I can't be bothered looking up. That's one of them.
===

Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
New Thank you. I'll be here all week.
New Fair, but note
Anyone involved with Perl will be annoyed by your getting it wrong. Whether this is cause to remember or a bonus for not remembering depends on your perspective and personality.

Cheers,
Ben
To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act
- [link|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20|Nebraska Supreme Court]
New I was already admonished for that.
Hence I didn't use the wrong usage.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

Heard near the SCOG employee entry/exit way:

  Security: We got another Mass Exodus Doorway Jam.
     clustering, best practices and standards - (boxley) - (23)
         Single lock manager? - (broomberg) - (21)
             Saw something for this a while ago - (drewk) - (7)
                 OT: Isn't PERL a no-no? -NT - (Another Scott) - (6)
                     By who's measure? - (folkert) - (5)
                         Too obscure, I guess. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                             Bah, figured it was a captalization slam - (drewk) - (2)
                                 Thank you. I'll be here all week. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                 Fair, but note - (ben_tilly)
                             I was already admonished for that. - (folkert)
             all nodes should separate - (boxley) - (12)
                 Nice theory - (broomberg) - (11)
                     it should do the following - (boxley) - (10)
                         Are all nodes full peers? - (drewk) - (9)
                             different setup - (boxley) - (7)
                                 You've described exactly what... - (folkert) - (6)
                                     Alternatively... - (pwhysall) - (5)
                                         I could, if I could get a real multithreaded OS - (boxley) - (4)
                                             You want VMS. You just don't know it yet. -NT - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                                 40k a month, no thanx, took one out of there 2 years ago -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                                                     40k a month? WTF for? - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                         lease with the supplier(big ass telco), no support at all - (boxley)
                             "My god, it's full of peers!" -NT - (deSitter)
         http://linux-ha.org/ -NT - (drewk)

Secret sauce.
74 ms