Re: Login checks and declarative processing - (admin) - (130) - May 24, 2004, 06:01:48 PM EDT
         Re Re: Login checks and declarative processing - (tablizer) - (129) - May 24, 2004, 07:17:45 PM EDT
             Declarative languages can easily be turing complete - (ChrisR) - (9) - May 24, 2004, 07:20:06 PM EDT
                 I am assuming he means XML-like -NT - (tablizer) - (8) - May 24, 2004, 07:46:00 PM EDT
                     There are a multitude of XML based languages.... - (ChrisR) - (7) - May 24, 2004, 08:11:34 PM EDT
                         If your config files are TC, then why have 2 langs? -NT - (tablizer) - (5) - May 24, 2004, 08:29:04 PM EDT
                             Do you really have to ask? - (ChrisR) - (2) - May 24, 2004, 08:35:23 PM EDT
                                 TC != Easy -NT - (tablizer) - (1) - May 24, 2004, 10:55:40 PM EDT
                                     Exactly. - (ChrisR) - May 24, 2004, 11:15:07 PM EDT
                             One's a hammer, the other is a screwdriver. -NT - (admin) - May 24, 2004, 08:35:44 PM EDT
                             As an aside, that question has popped up in another context - (ChrisR) - May 24, 2004, 09:03:21 PM EDT
                         BTW, Turing machines don't require much. - (ChrisR) - May 24, 2004, 08:34:25 PM EDT
             Re: Login checks and declarative processing - (admin) - (118) - May 24, 2004, 07:49:02 PM EDT
                 Login checks and declarative processing - (tablizer) - (117) - May 24, 2004, 08:09:21 PM EDT
                     Re: Login checks and declarative processing - (admin) - (116) - May 24, 2004, 08:35:10 PM EDT
                         Polymorphism - (tablizer) - (115) - May 24, 2004, 09:48:47 PM EDT
                             Raison d'etre d'composition - (FuManChu) - (3) - May 24, 2004, 10:26:31 PM EDT
                                 Epicycles - (tablizer) - (2) - May 24, 2004, 10:51:41 PM EDT
                                     Re: Epicycles - (admin) - May 25, 2004, 12:05:15 AM EDT
                                     Once more with feeling - (FuManChu) - May 25, 2004, 11:13:30 AM EDT
                             So the best organization of code is... - (ChrisR) - (8) - May 24, 2004, 11:16:32 PM EDT
                                 The funny thing is... - (admin) - (1) - May 25, 2004, 12:06:18 AM EDT
                                     Noticed that too - (drewk) - May 25, 2004, 09:21:30 AM EDT
                                 That is NOT what I said - (tablizer) - (5) - May 25, 2004, 01:31:18 AM EDT
                                     Re: That is NOT what I said - (admin) - May 25, 2004, 10:16:12 AM EDT
                                     Poor dichotomy on which to base your opinion of OO - (FuManChu) - (3) - May 25, 2004, 11:19:09 AM EDT
                                         re: Poor dichotomy on which to base your opinion of OO - (tablizer) - (2) - May 25, 2004, 07:30:34 PM EDT
                                             re: Poor dichotomy on which to base your opinion of OO - (admin) - (1) - May 25, 2004, 07:36:46 PM EDT
                                                 How Lisp of you. Just add some TOP now. -NT - (tablizer) - May 25, 2004, 08:17:23 PM EDT
                             Who says it's hard-coupled to a single factor? - (admin) - (101) - May 24, 2004, 11:57:05 PM EDT
                                 so you say - (tablizer) - (100) - May 25, 2004, 01:26:37 AM EDT
                                     Sounds like another... - (admin) - (99) - May 25, 2004, 09:53:22 AM EDT
                                         Text is linear - (tablizer) - (98) - May 25, 2004, 04:46:02 PM EDT
                                             Re: Text is linear - (admin) - (97) - May 25, 2004, 04:59:33 PM EDT
                                                 Delt-A-Matic - (tablizer) - (96) - May 25, 2004, 07:25:43 PM EDT
                                                     Re: Delt-A-Matic - (admin) - (95) - May 25, 2004, 07:36:15 PM EDT
                                                         problem is treed-files, not procedural - (tablizer) - (94) - May 25, 2004, 08:15:51 PM EDT
                                                             Re: problem is treed-files, not procedural - (admin) - (21) - May 25, 2004, 08:26:03 PM EDT
                                                                 Re: problem is treed-files, not procedural - (tablizer) - (20) - May 25, 2004, 09:02:21 PM EDT
                                                                     Re: problem is treed-files, not procedural - (admin) - (19) - May 25, 2004, 09:11:02 PM EDT
                                                                         Re: problem is treed-files, not procedural - (tablizer) - (18) - May 26, 2004, 01:39:55 AM EDT
                                                                             Re: problem is treed-files, not procedural - (admin) - (17) - May 26, 2004, 08:17:33 AM EDT
                                                                                 misunderstanding - (tablizer) - (16) - May 26, 2004, 12:49:28 PM EDT
                                                                                     Re: misunderstanding - (admin) - (15) - May 26, 2004, 02:38:55 PM EDT
                                                                                         Well... I pack up my development database and... - (ChrisR) - May 26, 2004, 02:43:12 PM EDT
                                                                                         How do you prime it in the first place? - (folkert) - (2) - May 26, 2004, 03:30:05 PM EDT
                                                                                             I prefer Kilz myself. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 26, 2004, 03:41:04 PM EDT
                                                                                                 That works well... - (folkert) - May 26, 2004, 03:51:37 PM EDT
                                                                                         The file system *is* a database - (tablizer) - (9) - May 26, 2004, 03:54:38 PM EDT
                                                                                             Re: The file system *is* a database - (admin) - (8) - May 26, 2004, 04:48:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                 over-the-phone brain surgery - (tablizer) - (7) - May 26, 2004, 07:27:42 PM EDT
                                                                                                     Re: over-the-phone brain surgery - (admin) - (6) - May 26, 2004, 07:39:07 PM EDT
                                                                                                         a single command does not like databases? - (tablizer) - (5) - May 27, 2004, 01:29:08 AM EDT
                                                                                                             Re: a single command does not like databases? - (admin) - (3) - May 27, 2004, 09:16:09 AM EDT
                                                                                                                 Re: single command - (tablizer) - (2) - May 27, 2004, 12:46:38 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     Naw... you are thinking... - (folkert) - May 27, 2004, 01:55:32 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     Re: single command - (admin) - May 27, 2004, 02:46:30 PM EDT
                                                                                                             Database migrations (new thread) - (admin) - May 27, 2004, 09:16:20 AM EDT
                                                                                         Nit: some code does belong in a database. (sp's) -NT - (mmoffitt) - May 27, 2004, 04:52:26 PM EDT
                                                             Exactly. - (FuManChu) - (71) - May 25, 2004, 08:40:29 PM EDT
                                                                 Amazing, isn't it? - (admin) - May 25, 2004, 08:42:41 PM EDT
                                                                 OO takes credit for sunrises even - (tablizer) - (69) - May 25, 2004, 09:11:42 PM EDT
                                                                     Scheme and the Lambda Calculus - (ChrisR) - May 25, 2004, 09:12:57 PM EDT
                                                                     Re: OO takes credit for sunrises even - (admin) - (60) - May 25, 2004, 09:13:22 PM EDT
                                                                         No way Jose -- Gotta go to DB anyhow - (tablizer) - (59) - May 26, 2004, 01:30:09 AM EDT
                                                                             Er... - (admin) - (27) - May 26, 2004, 08:11:48 AM EDT
                                                                                 "Use OO because OO is faster" is the best you can do? - (tablizer) - (26) - May 26, 2004, 12:40:01 PM EDT
                                                                                     Serious question - (drewk) - (2) - May 26, 2004, 01:12:56 PM EDT
                                                                                         Interrelated - (tablizer) - (1) - May 26, 2004, 04:08:44 PM EDT
                                                                                             Re: Interrelated - (admin) - May 26, 2004, 04:54:00 PM EDT
                                                                                     Re: "Use OO because OO is faster" is the best you can do? - (admin) - (22) - May 26, 2004, 05:00:33 PM EDT
                                                                                         Table != Disk - (tablizer) - (21) - May 27, 2004, 01:42:29 PM EDT
                                                                                             Re: OR mappers slowing things down - (ChrisR) - (17) - May 27, 2004, 01:51:37 PM EDT
                                                                                                 Re: OR mappers slowing things down - (tablizer) - (16) - May 27, 2004, 02:38:09 PM EDT
                                                                                                     Re: OR mappers slowing things down - (ChrisR) - (15) - May 27, 2004, 02:51:27 PM EDT
                                                                                                         Re: OR mappers slowing things down - (tablizer) - (14) - May 27, 2004, 03:32:44 PM EDT
                                                                                                             Procedural abstraction - (ChrisR) - (2) - May 27, 2004, 03:52:22 PM EDT
                                                                                                                 My abstraction can beat up your abstraction - (tablizer) - (1) - May 27, 2004, 04:59:40 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     re: Relational is more than storage (new thread) - (ChrisR) - May 27, 2004, 05:23:52 PM EDT
                                                                                                             It wasn't a caching issue - (ben_tilly) - (10) - May 27, 2004, 05:44:43 PM EDT
                                                                                                                 No file IO - (admin) - (9) - May 27, 2004, 06:36:08 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     I understand how it worked - (ben_tilly) - (8) - May 27, 2004, 06:42:57 PM EDT
                                                                                                                         Index lookup in code, or table index? - (admin) - (7) - May 27, 2004, 06:51:28 PM EDT
                                                                                                                             That requirement would shock me - (ben_tilly) - (6) - May 27, 2004, 07:14:44 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                 Re: That requirement would shock me - (admin) - (5) - May 27, 2004, 10:10:43 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                     Question about Oracle tables - (ChrisR) - (2) - May 27, 2004, 10:33:28 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                         You can pin them in memory. - (admin) - (1) - May 27, 2004, 11:06:22 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                             Oracle tables pinned in memory. - (admin) - June 3, 2004, 10:56:28 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                     You did give the impression that CPU was the issue - (ben_tilly) - (1) - May 27, 2004, 11:04:10 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                         Whoops, my mistake. -NT - (admin) - May 27, 2004, 11:05:24 PM EDT
                                                                                             Re: Table != Disk - (admin) - (2) - May 27, 2004, 02:56:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                 This is an area in which I'm proud of Dejavu - (FuManChu) - (1) - May 27, 2004, 04:14:42 PM EDT
                                                                                                     Nifty. - (admin) - May 27, 2004, 04:53:04 PM EDT
                                                                             Another little anecdote for you: - (admin) - (7) - May 26, 2004, 08:35:37 AM EDT
                                                                                 OT: Scott, can we please do something about long lines? - (jb4) - (6) - May 26, 2004, 12:27:41 PM EDT
                                                                                     Dang, this was SUPPOSED to go into the Suggestions forum - (jb4) - (3) - May 26, 2004, 01:04:43 PM EDT
                                                                                         The other way, besides cut and paste, is to re-type it :-) -NT - (ChrisR) - (2) - May 26, 2004, 03:45:01 PM EDT
                                                                                             There isn't enough time in the world... - (jb4) - (1) - May 27, 2004, 10:37:13 AM EDT
                                                                                                 HTH: As with Perl, There's More Than One Way To Do It -NT - (ChrisR) - May 27, 2004, 12:43:31 PM EDT
                                                                                     Perhaps one might play with CSS clip and overflow...? -NT - (FuManChu) - May 26, 2004, 03:08:03 PM EDT
                                                                                     Not that I'm aware of. - (admin) - May 26, 2004, 05:03:23 PM EDT
                                                                             Retrieving the customer record anyway: - (admin) - (22) - May 26, 2004, 08:45:08 AM EDT
                                                                                 question - (tablizer) - (21) - May 26, 2004, 12:19:22 PM EDT
                                                                                     Re: question - (admin) - (20) - May 26, 2004, 05:01:17 PM EDT
                                                                                         The other method is to have one column.... - (ChrisR) - (2) - May 26, 2004, 05:06:03 PM EDT
                                                                                             Re: The other method is to have one column.... - (admin) - (1) - May 26, 2004, 05:09:50 PM EDT
                                                                                                 That's the spirit!!! -NT - (ChrisR) - May 26, 2004, 05:22:00 PM EDT
                                                                                         I would have to look at the nature of the data -NT - (tablizer) - (16) - May 26, 2004, 07:09:21 PM EDT
                                                                                             Are you kidding?? - (admin) - (15) - May 26, 2004, 07:41:22 PM EDT
                                                                                                 suggestion 3 - (tablizer) - (14) - May 27, 2004, 01:43:07 AM EDT
                                                                                                     Re: suggestion 3 - (admin) - (13) - May 27, 2004, 08:55:03 AM EDT
                                                                                                         bottleneck black box - (tablizer) - (12) - May 27, 2004, 01:23:42 PM EDT
                                                                                                             Storing Dictionary as Session variables in ASP - (ChrisR) - (8) - May 27, 2004, 01:30:59 PM EDT
                                                                                                                 It has gotta go *somewhere* - (tablizer) - (7) - May 27, 2004, 01:52:52 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     ASP is OO - (ChrisR) - (6) - May 27, 2004, 02:08:10 PM EDT
                                                                                                                         re: ASP is OO - (tablizer) - (5) - May 27, 2004, 02:28:21 PM EDT
                                                                                                                             ASP = COM - (ChrisR) - (4) - May 27, 2004, 02:55:24 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                 re: ASP = COM - (tablizer) - (3) - May 27, 2004, 03:18:32 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                     ChiliSoft ASP - (ChrisR) - (2) - May 27, 2004, 03:33:09 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                         Interesting terminology - (FuManChu) - (1) - May 27, 2004, 04:19:21 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                             You're probably correct convention-wise - (ChrisR) - May 27, 2004, 04:32:41 PM EDT
                                                                                                             Re: bottleneck black box - (admin) - (2) - May 27, 2004, 03:30:05 PM EDT
                                                                                                                 how they relate - (tablizer) - (1) - May 27, 2004, 03:47:54 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     Re: how they relate - (admin) - May 27, 2004, 04:11:02 PM EDT
                                                                     I don't understand why you mention "eval" -NT - (FuManChu) - (6) - May 25, 2004, 09:30:28 PM EDT
                                                                         re: I don't understand why you mention "eval" - (tablizer) - (5) - May 26, 2004, 01:27:26 AM EDT
                                                                             I get it now. - (FuManChu) - (4) - May 26, 2004, 10:57:29 AM EDT
                                                                                 OO is just a (bad) reinvention of 60's databases with - (tablizer) - (3) - May 26, 2004, 12:43:59 PM EDT
                                                                                     No. You are a proponent of OO programming. - (folkert) - (2) - May 26, 2004, 01:10:43 PM EDT
                                                                                         The question that launched a thousand arguments - (tablizer) - (1) - May 26, 2004, 04:17:57 PM EDT
                                                                                             That explains a lot - (FuManChu) - May 26, 2004, 04:21:36 PM EDT