One man's cack is anothers......um

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #152,106 by tablizer 4/21/04 5:00:38 PM Reply	One man's cack is anothers......um Well, then those people can always resize their browser windows, can't they? Many don't bother, and you have to keep sizing it back as you move around the web. Most want text ready-to-read without fiddling. Bottom line: It looks cack. If I get an anti-OO book deal, I'll use the money to pay somebody to overhaul all 100 pages. If I had to do it all over again, I would probably try a different approach, such as using a hosting service that allows server-side includes so that I don't have to duplicate the formatting stuff. ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #152,118 by admin 4/21/04 7:21:42 PM Reply	Duplicating the formatting stuff... It's called "CSS". Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #152,123 by tablizer 4/21/04 8:38:36 PM Reply	Re: CSS But I want the header and the footer defined elsewhere, not just fonts and colors. Are you suggesting using CSS to replace HTML? Personally I think they should stick with one or the other. We don't need two different language syntaxes floating around. If XML was not powerful enough, then dump it for a better markup language. (Lispers suggest S-expressions.) ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #152,132 by admin 4/21/04 9:09:44 PM Reply	You said, "formatting" Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #152,135 by tablizer 4/21/04 9:11:52 PM Reply	Sorry, I meant in a general sense, not a per-element sense ________________ oop.ismad.com
Post #152,141 by ben_tilly 4/21/04 9:16:38 PM Reply	Then you wanted "templating" instead. To deny the indirect purchaser, who in this case is the ultimate purchaser, the right to seek relief from unlawful conduct, would essentially remove the word consumer from the Consumer Protection Act - [link\|http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?NewsID=1246&Page=1&pagePos=20\|Nebraska Supreme Court]
Post #152,249 by tablizer 4/22/04 3:51:28 PM Reply	You are right. That is a better word for it. ________________ oop.ismad.com

Perl 6, Apocalypse 12 is out - (ben_tilly) - (47) - April 16, 2004, 08:39:12 PM EDT

Shapes in Perl 6 - (JimWeirich) - (46) - April 18, 2004, 10:34:53 PM EDT

Shapes again? aaaaaahhhhh! -NT - (tablizer) - (43) - April 19, 2004, 02:13:22 PM EDT

Re: Shapes again? aaaaaahhhhh! - (JimWeirich) - (42) - April 19, 2004, 09:32:56 PM EDT

re: aaaaaahhhhh! - (tablizer) - (41) - April 20, 2004, 08:21:03 PM EDT

I like the background. :-) - (admin) - (32) - April 20, 2004, 09:26:22 PM EDT

regarding formatting - (tablizer) - (31) - April 21, 2004, 12:49:24 AM EDT

Re: regarding formatting - (pwhysall) - (7) - April 21, 2004, 01:21:02 AM EDT

One man's cack is anothers......um - (tablizer) - (6) - April 21, 2004, 05:00:38 PM EDT

Duplicating the formatting stuff... - (admin) - (5) - April 21, 2004, 07:21:42 PM EDT

Re: CSS - (tablizer) - (4) - April 21, 2004, 08:38:36 PM EDT

You said, "formatting" -NT - (admin) - (3) - April 21, 2004, 09:09:44 PM EDT

Sorry, I meant in a general sense, not a per-element sense -NT - (tablizer) - (2) - April 21, 2004, 09:11:52 PM EDT

Then you wanted "templating" instead. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - April 21, 2004, 09:16:38 PM EDT

You are right. That is a better word for it. -NT - (tablizer) - April 22, 2004, 03:51:28 PM EDT

Re: regarding formatting - (admin) - (7) - April 21, 2004, 08:38:28 AM EDT

goto contest - (tablizer) - (6) - April 21, 2004, 05:05:06 PM EDT

Re: goto contest - (admin) - (5) - April 21, 2004, 07:22:43 PM EDT

I already did an XBase version. (There is also an L version) - (tablizer) - (4) - April 21, 2004, 08:43:23 PM EDT

I'm not talking about shapes. -NT - (admin) - (3) - April 21, 2004, 09:09:04 PM EDT

What are you talking about? - (tablizer) - (2) - April 21, 2004, 09:13:31 PM EDT

Your "peoples" example. -NT - (admin) - (1) - April 21, 2004, 09:13:55 PM EDT

People database - (tablizer) - April 22, 2004, 02:44:39 AM EDT

Read for content - (jb4) - (14) - April 21, 2004, 02:13:12 PM EDT

All these years, and still no slamdunk OO evidence - (tablizer) - (13) - April 21, 2004, 05:10:17 PM EDT

How would you know that ?!? "Slam-dunked" X times over... - (CRConrad) - (12) - April 22, 2004, 02:15:40 AM EDT

Psychology, Psychology, Psychology - (tablizer) - (11) - April 22, 2004, 02:53:57 AM EDT

And what else would you *EXPECT*? - (ben_tilly) - (10) - April 22, 2004, 02:28:43 PM EDT

Goto's and OO both share INconsistency - (tablizer) - (5) - April 22, 2004, 03:28:34 PM EDT

And there is one reader's imagination... -NT - (ben_tilly) - (4) - April 22, 2004, 04:23:30 PM EDT

Dr. Codd was hallucinating? - (tablizer) - (3) - April 22, 2004, 06:18:16 PM EDT

Re: Dr. Codd was hallucinating? - (jb4) - (1) - April 22, 2004, 06:27:08 PM EDT

Doesn't look like it. - (Another Scott) - April 22, 2004, 06:38:44 PM EDT

It was a reference to an earlier post - (ben_tilly) - April 22, 2004, 08:04:59 PM EDT

But in the immortal words of Ringo: - (jb4) - (3) - April 22, 2004, 06:25:45 PM EDT

Goto's are a Rorschach test: we see what we hate in it -NT - (tablizer) - (2) - April 22, 2004, 09:14:12 PM EDT

Go program in DCL, then. - (pwhysall) - (1) - April 23, 2004, 01:54:18 AM EDT

I think you missed my point -NT - (tablizer) - April 23, 2004, 03:07:46 AM EDT

Purpose of Shapes - (JimWeirich) - (7) - April 21, 2004, 02:14:01 PM EDT

sniggle :-) working code -NT - (boxley) - April 21, 2004, 02:21:08 PM EDT

derth of more applicable examples - (tablizer) - (1) - April 21, 2004, 05:49:55 PM EDT

Re: derth of more applicable examples - (JimWeirich) - April 23, 2004, 07:56:30 PM EDT

Your URL is broken - (ben_tilly) - (3) - April 21, 2004, 06:40:31 PM EDT

Nope. - (admin) - April 21, 2004, 09:08:40 PM EDT

Re: Your URL is broken - (JimWeirich) - (1) - April 21, 2004, 10:11:21 PM EDT

Very long URLs have ellipsis inserted in the URL. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - April 21, 2004, 10:22:29 PM EDT

Corrected version - (ben_tilly) - (1) - April 19, 2004, 07:12:52 PM EDT

Re: Corrected version - (JimWeirich) - April 19, 2004, 09:32:03 PM EDT

iwethey.org

It's smarter than you think.
77 ms