IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / OT: Anonymous methods - looks like a proper closure
Post #151,059
by Arkadiy
Picture of Arkadiy
4/13/04 5:15:41 PM
Reply
New OT: Anonymous methods - looks like a proper closure
--

Buy high, sell sober.
Post #151,064
by ChrisR
4/13/04 5:28:32 PM
Reply
New Getting closer - probably did it just to po java
And keeping to the parallel universe, I see that c# does not allow [link|http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/04/05/C20/default.aspx|Partial Enums]:

In fact, you can have as many parts as you like in any given class. Partial type support is available for classes, structures, and interfaces, but you cannot have a partial enum definition.


Probably doesn't have any relevance to the original C++ question. :-)
     C++ Question - (jb4) - (8) - April 13, 2004, 04:58:07 PM EDT
         Begs the question - (ChrisR) - (5) - April 13, 2004, 05:07:15 PM EDT
             OT: Anonymous methods - looks like a proper closure -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1) - April 13, 2004, 05:15:41 PM EDT
                 Getting closer - probably did it just to po java - (ChrisR) - April 13, 2004, 05:28:32 PM EDT
             What question is that? - (jb4) - (2) - April 13, 2004, 05:20:34 PM EDT
                 How to avoid a C++ flamefest... - (ChrisR) - (1) - April 13, 2004, 06:24:25 PM EDT
                     Good point - (jb4) - April 14, 2004, 10:48:19 AM EDT
         They are essentially the same as C enums - (tuberculosis) - (1) - April 13, 2004, 07:26:08 PM EDT
             Bummah! - (jb4) - April 14, 2004, 10:54:02 AM EDT

The kids should've been walking to school with EMP lunchboxes.
64 ms