Well from a support guy point of view

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #149,208 by boxley 3/29/04 12:29:08 PM Reply	Well from a support guy point of view distributed Webservers pointed at centralized DB's would be easier to manage. 2 geographically dispersed hosted in ironman datacenters, one master and one slave with enough bandwidth. Webservers in each decentralized location with a caching solution like weblogic so the clients are thin. In a blackout your ohio DB would autofail to the texas database. Cheaper than Oracle. thanx, bill "You're just like me streak. You never left the free-fire zone.You think aspirins and meetings and cold showers are going to clean out your head. What you want is God's permission to paint the trees with the bad guys. That wont happen big mon." Clete questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #149,209 by drewk 3/29/04 1:02:26 PM Reply	That's one of the things we're considering Like I said, we'll consider anything. But looking at the cost of T3s ... wooh. === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #149,211 by boxley 3/29/04 1:16:28 PM Reply	well with the thin clients pointing to an webserver at the colo, your traffic would not be as heavy as an app server at the remote location. Your appserver(s) would be at the colo with only screen updates being ferried to the remotes. Might not need T3's thanx, bill "You're just like me streak. You never left the free-fire zone.You think aspirins and meetings and cold showers are going to clean out your head. What you want is God's permission to paint the trees with the bad guys. That wont happen big mon." Clete questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]

Could you do multi-master replication for < $1-million? - (drewk) - (11) - March 29, 2004, 11:35:18 AM EST

Sure, T3's :-) -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 29, 2004, 11:55:31 AM EST

/me smacks forehead - (drewk) - March 29, 2004, 12:17:47 PM EST

Well from a support guy point of view - (boxley) - (2) - March 29, 2004, 12:29:08 PM EST

That's one of the things we're considering - (drewk) - (1) - March 29, 2004, 01:02:26 PM EST

well with the thin clients pointing to an webserver at the - (boxley) - March 29, 2004, 01:16:28 PM EST

Does this answer your question about PG? - (folkert) - (5) - March 29, 2004, 02:18:23 PM EST

Much cool - (drewk) - (4) - March 29, 2004, 02:21:06 PM EST

Willingness to spend some of that <$1million might help :-P -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 29, 2004, 02:27:53 PM EST

We are ... ___________________________________ No, seriously - (drewk) - March 29, 2004, 02:33:49 PM EST

Goto: - (folkert) - (1) - March 29, 2004, 03:47:03 PM EST

Will do, thanks for the pointers -NT - (drewk) - March 29, 2004, 05:12:13 PM EST

iwethey.org

Don't just embrace the crazy, sidle up next to it and lick its ear.
78 ms