IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Epicuria and Health Forum / Cast Iron is great for frying, no economical substitute . .
Post #147,474
by Andrew Grygus
Picture of Andrew Grygus
3/21/04 7:04:11 PM
Reply
New Cast Iron is great for frying, no economical substitute . .
. . but if your cooking has a long simmering phase after frying, it's less than ideal. Enameled Iron is where it's at then.

I have a general 9" frying pan which is kept properly seasoned and a sheet steel (better temperature control and shape) omelet pan. The omelet pan never sees water, but the frying pan gets scrubbed out and reseasoned when it gets too much build-up on the sides.

Grape seed oil works very well for seasoning.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
Post #147,475
by boxley
3/21/04 7:06:25 PM
Reply
New Simmering goes into the preassure cooker, without the top on
stout steel construction keeps an even temp, dont preassure cook too much anymore, just chicken when Im in a hurry.
thanx,
bill
when I was young I envisioned myself as the embodiment of Trinity, Now I realize I have turned into the Bambino
questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
     Enameled Iron isn't forever - (Andrew Grygus) - (24) - March 21, 2004, 12:10:50 PM EST
         I've been happy with some stuff from Target. - (Another Scott) - (11) - March 21, 2004, 01:25:36 PM EST
             Aluminum conducts heat well . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (10) - March 21, 2004, 01:57:45 PM EST
                 We have a 3.5qt Calphalon anodized Windsor - (admin) - March 21, 2004, 02:38:20 PM EST
                 dupe, sorry -NT - (Arkadiy) - March 22, 2004, 06:39:53 PM EST
                 Why doesn't somebody put cast iron on top of aluminium? - (Arkadiy) - (2) - March 22, 2004, 06:39:32 PM EST
                     Cast Iron is generally thick enough . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 22, 2004, 08:43:16 PM EST
                         I was thinking "weight" - (Arkadiy) - March 23, 2004, 09:51:40 AM EST
                 What's wrong with Pyrex? - (deSitter) - (4) - March 22, 2004, 08:57:48 PM EST
                     Re: What's wrong with Pyrex? - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - March 22, 2004, 09:06:53 PM EST
                         I've got some Pyrex pots and skillets. - (Another Scott) - March 22, 2004, 09:20:21 PM EST
                         Re: What's wrong with Pyrex? - (deSitter) - (1) - March 22, 2004, 09:47:56 PM EST
                             The kitchen isn't a lab - it's a production facility. - (Andrew Grygus) - March 23, 2004, 01:13:55 AM EST
         Re: multi-ply stainless - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - March 21, 2004, 02:59:05 PM EST
             ATTN: Alex Re: "Seal-O-Matic" waterless cookware - (twosnugglebugs) - (2) - May 31, 2006, 11:35:53 PM EDT
                 welcome and post often -NT - (boxley) - June 1, 2006, 07:56:33 AM EDT
                 Do you know anything about that? - (a6l6e6x) - June 5, 2006, 12:10:20 AM EDT
         Nothing beats a well-seasoned carbon steel wok - (pwhysall) - (4) - March 21, 2004, 03:01:22 PM EST
             Hallelujah! Preach it, brother! -NT - (FuManChu) - March 21, 2004, 06:14:52 PM EST
             Woks are a religion . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 21, 2004, 06:49:01 PM EST
                 Sink? - (pwhysall) - March 22, 2004, 01:54:49 AM EST
                 Wok Update - (Andrew Grygus) - June 1, 2006, 02:35:46 AM EDT
         prefer cast iron cookware for even heat distribution - (boxley) - (2) - March 21, 2004, 04:08:58 PM EST
             Cast Iron is great for frying, no economical substitute . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - March 21, 2004, 07:04:11 PM EST
                 Simmering goes into the preassure cooker, without the top on - (boxley) - March 21, 2004, 07:06:25 PM EST

Solar-powered!
57 ms