A whole lot of vegans would object strenuously to your definition. Their definition most certainly includes ethics and a determination not to inconvenience any animal ([link|http://www.vegan.com/faq.php|Vegan.com FAQ]). They maintain extensive lists of foods that include no animal products (by brand).
Of course, you could separate "vegan diet" from "Vegan", but without the ethics I'd just class that as "vegetarian - no dairy".
As for the Michio Kushi Macrobiotics stuff, I thought of including that but I haven't met one for so many years I just decided to see if anyone brought it up. It's based on brown rice, and anything that was not commonly eatin in pre-WWII Japan is simply not on the menu. Potatoes, tomatoes, chilis, tropical fruits, anything whatever spicy - definitely bad, bad, bad. A little fish is allowed for newbies. Chart at [link|http://www.kushiinstitute.org/whatismacro.html|Michio Kushi Institute].
Yes, ethics is optional for regular vegetarians (and the persistant claim that Adolf Hitler was an "ethical vegetarian" is not true). By your description, I'd classify you as "Tolerably Vegetarian".