IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Religion, Philosophy, Metaphysics Forum / So then...
Post #146,386
by cwbrenn
3/15/04 8:24:20 PM
Reply
New So then...
Are you in favor of banning Shakespeare on the grounds that George Bush is an idiot?
"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?"
- Edward Young
Post #146,387
by Ashton
3/15/04 8:28:11 PM
Reply
New It's always less risky to shoot dead messengers___:-\ufffd
Post #146,389
by cwbrenn
3/15/04 8:38:19 PM
Reply
New LOL. Well writ!
"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?"
- Edward Young
     houghtful commentary on gibsons movie, the Passion - (boxley) - (58) - March 8, 2004, 10:12:16 PM EST
         Ever see 'Dogma'? - (drewk) - March 9, 2004, 12:38:48 AM EST
         More - anti-Jew stance still a winner - (deSitter) - (56) - March 9, 2004, 06:37:58 AM EST
             interesting point made - (boxley) - (1) - March 9, 2004, 09:06:38 AM EST
                 Ah, the Bush technique of selecting press questioners. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - March 9, 2004, 10:00:40 AM EST
             I think you've flipped. - (Nightowl) - (12) - March 9, 2004, 11:56:08 AM EST
                 C'est l'eau de Saint Louis -NT - (pwhysall) - March 9, 2004, 12:02:01 PM EST
                 Demur - (Ashton) - (10) - March 9, 2004, 06:44:12 PM EST
                     Did that help, Owl? -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - March 9, 2004, 07:28:57 PM EST
                         Re: Did that help, Owl? - (Nightowl) - (1) - March 10, 2004, 01:54:16 PM EST
                             The french means, more or less - (hnick) - March 10, 2004, 02:11:57 PM EST
                     Sorry Ashton, - (Nightowl) - (6) - March 10, 2004, 01:57:50 PM EST
                         Re: Sorry Ashton, - (deSitter) - (3) - March 10, 2004, 02:16:34 PM EST
                             You forget, Ross - (Nightowl) - (2) - March 10, 2004, 02:24:10 PM EST
                                 Fair enough - (deSitter) - (1) - March 10, 2004, 02:28:44 PM EST
                                     Okay - (Nightowl) - March 10, 2004, 02:41:38 PM EST
                         There's a certain mindset in the grognard crew... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - March 10, 2004, 02:30:33 PM EST
                             Strangely.. - (deSitter) - March 10, 2004, 02:37:53 PM EST
             That's a crock, de - (cwbrenn) - (40) - March 15, 2004, 03:24:08 PM EST
                 read the book, :-) and got a question for ya - (boxley) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 03:34:51 PM EST
                     I did, in fact. - (cwbrenn) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 03:37:47 PM EST
                         good review - (boxley) - March 15, 2004, 04:03:20 PM EST
                 Re: That's a crock, de - (deSitter) - (32) - March 15, 2004, 03:43:59 PM EST
                     Re: That's a crock, de - (cwbrenn) - (25) - March 15, 2004, 03:54:57 PM EST
                         ignore - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 04:08:55 PM EST
                         Re: That's a crock, de - (deSitter) - (22) - March 15, 2004, 04:08:15 PM EST
                             It wasn't intended to - (cwbrenn) - (21) - March 15, 2004, 05:18:32 PM EST
                                 That wasn't my experience - (Nightowl) - March 15, 2004, 05:24:15 PM EST
                                 But Gibson has a thing with violence - (deSitter) - (19) - March 15, 2004, 05:34:19 PM EST
                                     Perhaps, but existence is not always obsession - (FuManChu) - (8) - March 15, 2004, 06:44:09 PM EST
                                         Re: Perhaps, but existence is not always obsession - (deSitter) - (7) - March 15, 2004, 06:55:09 PM EST
                                             Violence in theatre is different - (cwbrenn) - (6) - March 15, 2004, 07:29:59 PM EST
                                                 no the movie was something he wanted to do - (boxley) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 07:37:20 PM EST
                                                     "Get Job!", the movie - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 07:57:31 PM EST
                                                 Re: Violence in theatre is different. Addendum - (Ashton) - (3) - March 15, 2004, 08:17:13 PM EST
                                                     So then... - (cwbrenn) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 08:24:20 PM EST
                                                         It's always less risky to shoot dead messengers___:-\ufffd -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 08:28:11 PM EST
                                                             LOL. Well writ! -NT - (cwbrenn) - March 15, 2004, 08:38:19 PM EST
                                     So what? - (cwbrenn) - (9) - March 15, 2004, 06:58:45 PM EST
                                         Ah, now that's a question, then. - (pwhysall) - (7) - March 15, 2004, 07:10:02 PM EST
                                             Re: Ah, now that's a question, then. - (cwbrenn) - (5) - March 15, 2004, 07:13:43 PM EST
                                                 You answer wisely, young Jedi :) - (pwhysall) - March 15, 2004, 07:14:43 PM EST
                                                 Forgetting DK? -NT - (FuManChu) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 07:59:30 PM EST
                                                     No, not forgetting. - (cwbrenn) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 08:08:20 PM EST
                                                         They are derivative -NT - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 08:10:45 PM EST
                                                 On hardcore... - (pwhysall) - March 16, 2004, 01:27:28 AM EST
                                             Black Flag, The Ramones, Richard Hell, Souxie -NT - (deSitter) - March 15, 2004, 07:46:16 PM EST
                                         Reminds me of Scratch Acid - (altmann) - March 15, 2004, 07:52:27 PM EST
                         Re: That's a crock, de - (pwhysall) - March 15, 2004, 06:50:49 PM EST
                     Re: That's a crock, de - (cwbrenn) - March 15, 2004, 05:19:46 PM EST
                     Sorry, I keep responding piecemeal. - (cwbrenn) - (4) - March 15, 2004, 05:27:34 PM EST
                         It's very simple - (deSitter) - (3) - March 15, 2004, 05:37:11 PM EST
                             Sure... a degree of sensitivity, yes - (cwbrenn) - (2) - March 15, 2004, 07:02:12 PM EST
                                 No they were plotting to kill an upstart rabbi - (boxley) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 07:11:58 PM EST
                                     Re: No they were plotting to kill an upstart rabbi - (cwbrenn) - March 15, 2004, 07:14:27 PM EST
                 Good to see you! - (pwhysall) - (3) - March 15, 2004, 06:48:27 PM EST
                     Thank you! - (cwbrenn) - (1) - March 15, 2004, 07:03:31 PM EST
                         Excellent... - (pwhysall) - March 15, 2004, 07:08:24 PM EST
                     Ditto.. and a small dot.NYET, .NIT re page: - (Ashton) - March 15, 2004, 07:36:56 PM EST

Remember, people in 1900 didn't know what an atom was. They didn't know its structure.

They also didn't know what a radio was, or an airport, or a movie, or a television, or a computer, or a cell phone, or a jet, an antibiotic, a rocket, a satellite, an MRI, ICU, IUD, IBM, IRA, ERA, EEG, EPA, IRS, DOD, PCP, HTML, internet. interferon, instant replay, remote sensing, remote control, speed dialing, gene therapy, gene splicing, genes, spot welding, heat-seeking, bipolar, prozac, leotards, lap dancing, email, tape recorder, CDs, airbags, plastic explosive, plastic, robots, cars, liposuction, transduction, superconduction, dish antennas, step aerobics, smoothies, twelve-step, ultrasound, nylon, rayon, teflon, fiber optics, carpal tunnel, laser surgery, laparoscopy, corneal transplant, kidney transplant, AIDS... None of this would have meant anything to a person in the year 1900. They wouldn't know what you are talking about.
119 ms