IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / Stored procs run in the Postgres process
Post #141,020
by admin
Picture of admin
2/10/04 7:10:12 PM
Reply
New Stored procs run in the Postgres process
Unless you punt and simply remote the call. I think the performance would suck, though.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #141,025
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
2/10/04 7:24:11 PM
Reply
New OK
..so perhaps postgres itself will have a minimal VM if you build it with the hypothetical plsqueak.
-drl
Post #141,031
by admin
Picture of admin
2/10/04 7:35:43 PM
Reply
New You'll want to look at this at least:
[link|http://www.kurtz-fernhout.com/squeak/|http://www.kurtz-fernhout.com/squeak/]
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
Post #141,387
by tuberculosis
Picture of tuberculosis
2/12/04 10:16:41 AM
Reply
New Look here
[link|http://www.netjam.org/squat/|http://www.netjam.org/squat/]

Squat is Craig Latta's minimal Squeak project. Basically he's trying to get the thing down to a little server kernel that has just enough capability to bulk itself up on demand over a network connection. Last I heard he was in the sub 100k range.

If you bug him about it he'll probably help you. There is a mailing list. My guess is that squat by itself is adequate for your project.


The tree of research must from time to time be refreshed with the blood of bean counters.
     -- Alan Kay
Post #141,400
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
2/12/04 10:54:22 AM
2/12/04 10:54:41 AM
Reply
New "squat" - rofl
-drl
Expand Edited by deSitter Feb. 12, 2004, 10:54:41 AM EST
Expand All History
Post #141,454
by a6l6e6x
Picture of a6l6e6x
2/12/04 1:29:52 PM
Reply
New Diddley that! :)
Alex
The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled. -- Plutarch
     How closely do Python concepts map to Smalltalk ones? - (deSitter) - (15) - Feb. 9, 2004, 09:41:35 PM EST
         Somewhat. -NT - (admin) - (12) - Feb. 9, 2004, 10:17:33 PM EST
             Care to elaborate? -NT - (deSitter) - (11) - Feb. 9, 2004, 10:22:08 PM EST
                 Easier for you to just experiment. - (admin) - (10) - Feb. 9, 2004, 10:23:06 PM EST
                     Some Differences - (JimWeirich) - (9) - Feb. 10, 2004, 01:17:39 PM EST
                         very useful - (deSitter) - (8) - Feb. 10, 2004, 05:45:40 PM EST
                             Biggest issue you will have: - (admin) - (7) - Feb. 10, 2004, 06:24:03 PM EST
                                 Re: Biggest issue you will have: - (deSitter) - (6) - Feb. 10, 2004, 06:48:40 PM EST
                                     Stored procs run in the Postgres process - (admin) - (5) - Feb. 10, 2004, 07:10:12 PM EST
                                         OK - (deSitter) - (4) - Feb. 10, 2004, 07:24:11 PM EST
                                             You'll want to look at this at least: - (admin) - Feb. 10, 2004, 07:35:43 PM EST
                                             Look here - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Feb. 12, 2004, 10:16:41 AM EST
                                                 "squat" - rofl -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 12, 2004, 10:54:41 AM EST
                                                     Diddley that! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Feb. 12, 2004, 01:29:52 PM EST
         I don't know enough about python to answer -NT - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 10, 2004, 09:57:10 AM EST
         Learn some Python then find a Smalltalk/Python usenet war ;) -NT - (FuManChu) - Feb. 10, 2004, 12:29:19 PM EST

You keep using that word, but I do not think that it means what you think it does.
131 ms