Nothing special about windows shell

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #136,008 by Arkadiy 1/15/04 9:46:31 PM Reply	Nothing special about windows shell You run cmd.exe, I run bash.exe. What's the difference? -- "It\ufffds possible to build a reasonably prosperous society that invests in its people, doesn\ufffdt invade its neighbors, opposes Israel and stands up to America. (Just look at France.)" -- James Lileks
Post #136,058 by deSitter 1/16/04 9:25:08 AM Reply	Re: Nothing special about windows shell If I go to company X and am stuck with Windows, I can put my console tools in my home directory and still use them. You misunderstand - I agree that he UNIX tools are great, and Windows would be better with such things already present, but I'm convinced that painted-on functionality is a bad idea. -drl
Post #136,101 by Arkadiy 1/16/04 11:49:27 AM Reply	I was trying to say that cmd.exe is as "pinted on" as bash.exe, Cygwin's default shell. There are other shells for windows as well, although the names escape me at the moment. -- "It\ufffds possible to build a reasonably prosperous society that invests in its people, doesn\ufffdt invade its neighbors, opposes Israel and stands up to America. (Just look at France.)" -- James Lileks

SFU - Use or not? - (broomberg) - (37) - Jan. 15, 2004, 03:29:48 PM EST

Re: SFU - Use or not? - (pwhysall) - Jan. 15, 2004, 04:14:28 PM EST

Isn't this the add-on... - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 04:39:53 PM EST

Linux is different than Unix - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:27:12 PM EST

rofl - I love that guy -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:53:54 PM EST

Re: SFU - Use or not? - (deSitter) - (31) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:08:12 PM EST

Never had a problem with that here. -NT - (admin) - (10) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:12:00 PM EST

It's not that it's buggy or junky - (deSitter) - (9) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:48:24 PM EST

I completely disagree. - (admin) - (8) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:53:27 PM EST

Re: I completely disagree. - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:05:16 PM EST

I dunno - (jake123) - (4) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:16:40 PM EST

Re: I dunno - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:26:12 PM EST

It is nice to have around - (jake123) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:27:35 PM EST

And so you've answered my main objection - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:34:25 PM EST

BTW - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:40:44 PM EST

Er... - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 10:13:39 PM EST

Re: Er... - (deSitter) - Jan. 16, 2004, 09:22:32 AM EST

Huh? - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:20:13 PM EST

ARRGG!! - (broomberg) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:22:57 PM EST

I am not sure it's wise - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:45:34 PM EST

BTW, - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:54:59 PM EST

Oh hush. - (pwhysall) - (15) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:44:30 PM EST

Re: Oh hush. - (deSitter) - (14) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:50:01 PM EST

It's worth having just for awk -NT - (pwhysall) - (10) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:54:11 PM EST

Or find. Or grep. Or ls. Or... -NT - (admin) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:01:32 PM EST

Re: It's worth having just for awk - (deSitter) - (8) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:06:22 PM EST

I see that. - (pwhysall) - (7) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:08:18 PM EST

Re: I see that. - (deSitter) - (6) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:13:00 PM EST

Well, Greg taught me - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:20:13 PM EST

Re: Well, Greg taught me - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:23:36 PM EST

Windows telnet server is unusably slow. -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:29:41 PM EST

? how can a telnet server be "slow"? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:35:32 PM EST

It can be slow... - (folkert) - Jan. 15, 2004, 08:48:59 PM EST

Bwahahaha, Love it. - (folkert) - Jan. 15, 2004, 08:46:28 PM EST

Nothing special about windows shell - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:46:31 PM EST

Re: Nothing special about windows shell - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2004, 09:25:08 AM EST

I was trying to say - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 16, 2004, 11:49:27 AM EST

Re: SFU - Use or not? - (orion) - Jan. 16, 2004, 01:07:25 AM EST

That will get motion if the package maintainer is a sheep...
80 ms