Linux is different than Unix

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #135,941 by broomberg 1/15/04 6:27:12 PM Reply	Linux is different than Unix Unix (as per the certification) is a committee beast. Lots of tradeoffs. IIRC there are historical system calls that Linus refused to implement, saying they were brain dead. So even if a vendor coughed up the $$ to try to certifiy a version, it wouldn't pass.
Post #135,948 by deSitter 1/15/04 6:53:54 PM Reply	rofl - I love that guy -drl

SFU - Use or not? - (broomberg) - (37) - Jan. 15, 2004, 03:29:48 PM EST

Re: SFU - Use or not? - (pwhysall) - Jan. 15, 2004, 04:14:28 PM EST

Isn't this the add-on... - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 04:39:53 PM EST

Linux is different than Unix - (broomberg) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:27:12 PM EST

rofl - I love that guy -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:53:54 PM EST

Re: SFU - Use or not? - (deSitter) - (31) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:08:12 PM EST

Never had a problem with that here. -NT - (admin) - (10) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:12:00 PM EST

It's not that it's buggy or junky - (deSitter) - (9) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:48:24 PM EST

I completely disagree. - (admin) - (8) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:53:27 PM EST

Re: I completely disagree. - (deSitter) - (7) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:05:16 PM EST

I dunno - (jake123) - (4) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:16:40 PM EST

Re: I dunno - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:26:12 PM EST

It is nice to have around - (jake123) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:27:35 PM EST

And so you've answered my main objection - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:34:25 PM EST

BTW - (deSitter) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:40:44 PM EST

Er... - (admin) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 10:13:39 PM EST

Re: Er... - (deSitter) - Jan. 16, 2004, 09:22:32 AM EST

Huh? - (broomberg) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:20:13 PM EST

ARRGG!! - (broomberg) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:22:57 PM EST

I am not sure it's wise - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:45:34 PM EST

BTW, - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:54:59 PM EST

Oh hush. - (pwhysall) - (15) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:44:30 PM EST

Re: Oh hush. - (deSitter) - (14) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:50:01 PM EST

It's worth having just for awk -NT - (pwhysall) - (10) - Jan. 15, 2004, 06:54:11 PM EST

Or find. Or grep. Or ls. Or... -NT - (admin) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:01:32 PM EST

Re: It's worth having just for awk - (deSitter) - (8) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:06:22 PM EST

I see that. - (pwhysall) - (7) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:08:18 PM EST

Re: I see that. - (deSitter) - (6) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:13:00 PM EST

Well, Greg taught me - (broomberg) - (5) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:20:13 PM EST

Re: Well, Greg taught me - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:23:36 PM EST

Windows telnet server is unusably slow. -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:29:41 PM EST

? how can a telnet server be "slow"? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 15, 2004, 07:35:32 PM EST

It can be slow... - (folkert) - Jan. 15, 2004, 08:48:59 PM EST

Bwahahaha, Love it. - (folkert) - Jan. 15, 2004, 08:46:28 PM EST

Nothing special about windows shell - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 09:46:31 PM EST

Re: Nothing special about windows shell - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2004, 09:25:08 AM EST

I was trying to say - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 16, 2004, 11:49:27 AM EST

Re: SFU - Use or not? - (orion) - Jan. 16, 2004, 01:07:25 AM EST

THEN WHO WAS PHONE?
98 ms