You don't like g77?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #135,642 by tuberculosis 1/14/04 9:16:57 AM 8/21/07 5:53:01 AM Reply	You don't like g77? Part of the gnu compiler suite? Has support on Mac OS X BTW. "I believe that many of the systems we build today in Java would be better built in Smalltalk and Gemstone." -- Martin Fowler, JAOO 2003 Edited by tuberculosis Aug. 21, 2007, 05:53:01 AM EDT Expand All History
Post #135,651 by deSitter 1/14/04 9:49:39 AM Reply	It's fine but it's not "real FORTRAN" It's a front end to a C compiler. A real FORTRAN compiler can do amazing optimizations because it has less to worry about in terms of memory juggling and linking. Intel/Linux compiler benchmarks: [link\|http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/compare/linux/f77bench_p3.html\|http://www.polyhedro.../f77bench_p3.html] Best overall, Lahey ("your FORTRAN source since 1967!") Intel/Win32 compiler benchmarks: [link\|http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/compare/win32/f77bench_p3.html\|http://www.polyhedro.../f77bench_p3.html] Best overall, Intel I assume these benchmarks are mostly on "real FORTRAN 77" code, without dynamic allocation etc. -drl
Post #135,696 by jake123 1/14/04 12:41:58 PM Reply	On that note The scitech guys are funding a feasibility study to port openwatcom to linux. --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

OpenWatcom 1.2 released - (jake123) - (9) - Jan. 13, 2004, 10:34:24 PM EST

WOW NICE! - (deSitter) - (8) - Jan. 14, 2004, 03:46:19 AM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (pwhysall) - Jan. 14, 2004, 03:59:22 AM EST

You don't like g77? - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:53:01 AM EDT

It's fine but it's not "real FORTRAN" - (deSitter) - Jan. 14, 2004, 09:49:39 AM EST

On that note - (jake123) - Jan. 14, 2004, 12:41:58 PM EST

Confused here. - (a6l6e6x) - (3) - Jan. 14, 2004, 10:28:10 PM EST

Re: Confused here. - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 15, 2004, 01:18:10 AM EST

I think many people have moved to matlab for that - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Aug. 21, 2007, 05:56:56 AM EDT

Fizzy Cysts still use FORTRAN - (pwhysall) - Jan. 15, 2004, 03:09:16 AM EST

iwethey.org

We didn't invent the art of wishful thinking... we just market it locally.
75 ms