Except:

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #133,620 by FuManChu 1/5/04 1:55:07 AM Reply	Except: But System is a very definite context. It has all rights of Adminstrator account on a local machine and no rights on the network. It has no user name/password associated with it, so users cannot log in on it. That's not the same thing as saying users can't execute code under its authority. Just run a service as System. I was one of the original authors of VB, and I wouldn't use VB for a text processing program. :-) Michael Geary, on comp.lang.python
Post #133,630 by Arkadiy 1/5/04 7:18:30 AM Reply	RIght you are -- "It\ufffds possible to build a reasonably prosperous society that invests in its people, doesn\ufffdt invade its neighbors, opposes Israel and stands up to America. (Just look at France.)" -- James Lileks
Post #133,631 by pwhysall 1/5/04 7:20:06 AM Reply	Bottom line If you can start a service, you can start it as System. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]

NET SEND to all except a few systems? - (SpiceWare) - (42) - Dec. 5, 2003, 04:08:12 PM EST

Send to group -NT - (Silverlock) - Dec. 5, 2003, 04:30:20 PM EST

If you send not to machine names, but... - (CRConrad) - (6) - Dec. 7, 2003, 03:50:29 PM EST

Re: If you send not to machine names, but... - (deSitter) - (5) - Dec. 7, 2003, 04:08:32 PM EST

"Messenger" != "NET SEND" ? - (CRConrad) - (4) - Dec. 7, 2003, 06:48:13 PM EST

NET SEND Help - (orion) - Dec. 7, 2003, 08:13:06 PM EST

Re: "Messenger" != "NET SEND" ? - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2003, 09:38:51 PM EST

Alternatively... - (pwhysall) - Dec. 8, 2003, 03:11:38 AM EST

So if Darrell's gang use W2K or later, they could try my way -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 8, 2003, 03:18:19 AM EST

update - (SpiceWare) - Dec. 8, 2003, 10:00:34 AM EST

Re: NET SEND to all except a few systems? - (qstephens) - (32) - Jan. 1, 2004, 10:30:25 AM EST

ROFL - (deSitter) - (31) - Jan. 1, 2004, 11:47:06 AM EST

It inspires me - (orion) - (30) - Jan. 1, 2004, 11:50:45 AM EST

Re: It inspires me - (deSitter) - (22) - Jan. 1, 2004, 12:11:51 PM EST

On this we agree - (orion) - Jan. 1, 2004, 03:23:51 PM EST

Windows has no user context? - (Arkadiy) - (20) - Jan. 2, 2004, 06:38:33 PM EST

process-level user context - (deSitter) - (19) - Jan. 2, 2004, 07:53:05 PM EST

I am still at a loss as to what you mean -NT - (Arkadiy) - (18) - Jan. 2, 2004, 10:22:02 PM EST

A login is a profile - (orion) - Jan. 2, 2004, 11:36:02 PM EST

Re: I am still at a loss as to what you mean - (deSitter) - (16) - Jan. 3, 2004, 12:02:12 AM EST

You're much mistaken - (Arkadiy) - (15) - Jan. 3, 2004, 04:05:28 PM EST

Can you be logged in as two people at once? - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Jan. 3, 2004, 05:09:19 PM EST

Not log in, no. - (admin) - (3) - Jan. 3, 2004, 05:13:05 PM EST

I'll tuck that away in case I ever need it -NT - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 3, 2004, 07:33:08 PM EST

Yes you can and it is a weak security system - (orion) - (1) - Jan. 3, 2004, 08:10:23 PM EST

Re: Yes you can and it is a weak security system - (pwhysall) - Jan. 3, 2004, 11:54:08 PM EST

Certainly - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:10:45 PM EST

Re: Certainly - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:57:05 PM EST

You keep hearing yourself, not me - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 4, 2004, 08:35:49 PM EST

Re: You're much mistaken - (deSitter) - (6) - Jan. 3, 2004, 09:28:42 PM EST

What does hiererchy of processes have to do with it? - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:14:02 PM EST

Re: What does hiererchy of processes have to do with it? - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:54:51 PM EST

I am not sure what NT_AUTHORITY is - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2004, 08:42:31 PM EST

Except: - (FuManChu) - (2) - Jan. 5, 2004, 01:55:07 AM EST

RIght you are -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 5, 2004, 07:18:30 AM EST

Bottom line - (pwhysall) - Jan. 5, 2004, 07:20:06 AM EST

Careful there . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Jan. 1, 2004, 12:31:49 PM EST

Does it really? - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Jan. 1, 2004, 01:53:29 PM EST

I don't remember all the details . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 1, 2004, 02:23:54 PM EST

The licenses are more forgiving than you think - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 1, 2004, 02:48:58 PM EST

Really interesting issue - (orion) - Jan. 1, 2004, 03:27:39 PM EST

Bah! I'll make it freeware then. - (orion) - Jan. 1, 2004, 02:07:29 PM EST

that's what I did - (SpiceWare) - Jan. 2, 2004, 12:36:33 PM EST

I found Soylent to be a punishingly boring, joyless product.
108 ms