IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Windows vX.X Forum / Re: "Messenger" != "NET SEND" ?
Post #129,524
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
12/7/03 9:38:51 PM
Reply
New Re: "Messenger" != "NET SEND" ?
"Windows Messenger" in 3.x and 95 was a popup text box for displaying LAN Manager messages, which get sent to specific machines or domains/workgroups. "Windows Messenger Service" is the corresponding legacy service that pops up these messages on an informational dialog box.

And yes, I just checked, later versions of NET can send to individual users. The NT 4 NET SEND only went to machines. Most people disable the Messenger Service, because while doing a backup, they prefer not to be reminded of how small a penis they are sporting (Messenger spam).
-drl
Post #129,568
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
12/8/03 3:11:38 AM
Reply
New Alternatively...
...I drop all netBIOS traffic (inbound and outbound) at the firewall.

Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
Post #129,569
by CRConrad
12/8/03 3:18:19 AM
Reply
New So if Darrell's gang use W2K or later, they could try my way
     NET SEND to all except a few systems? - (SpiceWare) - (42) - Dec. 5, 2003, 04:08:12 PM EST
         Send to group -NT - (Silverlock) - Dec. 5, 2003, 04:30:20 PM EST
         If you send not to machine names, but... - (CRConrad) - (6) - Dec. 7, 2003, 03:50:29 PM EST
             Re: If you send not to machine names, but... - (deSitter) - (5) - Dec. 7, 2003, 04:08:32 PM EST
                 "Messenger" != "NET SEND" ? - (CRConrad) - (4) - Dec. 7, 2003, 06:48:13 PM EST
                     NET SEND Help - (orion) - Dec. 7, 2003, 08:13:06 PM EST
                     Re: "Messenger" != "NET SEND" ? - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2003, 09:38:51 PM EST
                         Alternatively... - (pwhysall) - Dec. 8, 2003, 03:11:38 AM EST
                         So if Darrell's gang use W2K or later, they could try my way -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 8, 2003, 03:18:19 AM EST
         update - (SpiceWare) - Dec. 8, 2003, 10:00:34 AM EST
         Re: NET SEND to all except a few systems? - (qstephens) - (32) - Jan. 1, 2004, 10:30:25 AM EST
             ROFL - (deSitter) - (31) - Jan. 1, 2004, 11:47:06 AM EST
                 It inspires me - (orion) - (30) - Jan. 1, 2004, 11:50:45 AM EST
                     Re: It inspires me - (deSitter) - (22) - Jan. 1, 2004, 12:11:51 PM EST
                         On this we agree - (orion) - Jan. 1, 2004, 03:23:51 PM EST
                         Windows has no user context? - (Arkadiy) - (20) - Jan. 2, 2004, 06:38:33 PM EST
                             process-level user context - (deSitter) - (19) - Jan. 2, 2004, 07:53:05 PM EST
                                 I am still at a loss as to what you mean -NT - (Arkadiy) - (18) - Jan. 2, 2004, 10:22:02 PM EST
                                     A login is a profile - (orion) - Jan. 2, 2004, 11:36:02 PM EST
                                     Re: I am still at a loss as to what you mean - (deSitter) - (16) - Jan. 3, 2004, 12:02:12 AM EST
                                         You're much mistaken - (Arkadiy) - (15) - Jan. 3, 2004, 04:05:28 PM EST
                                             Can you be logged in as two people at once? - (ben_tilly) - (7) - Jan. 3, 2004, 05:09:19 PM EST
                                                 Not log in, no. - (admin) - (3) - Jan. 3, 2004, 05:13:05 PM EST
                                                     I'll tuck that away in case I ever need it -NT - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 3, 2004, 07:33:08 PM EST
                                                     Yes you can and it is a weak security system - (orion) - (1) - Jan. 3, 2004, 08:10:23 PM EST
                                                         Re: Yes you can and it is a weak security system - (pwhysall) - Jan. 3, 2004, 11:54:08 PM EST
                                                 Certainly - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:10:45 PM EST
                                                     Re: Certainly - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:57:05 PM EST
                                                         You keep hearing yourself, not me - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 4, 2004, 08:35:49 PM EST
                                             Re: You're much mistaken - (deSitter) - (6) - Jan. 3, 2004, 09:28:42 PM EST
                                                 What does hiererchy of processes have to do with it? - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:14:02 PM EST
                                                     Re: What does hiererchy of processes have to do with it? - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 4, 2004, 12:54:51 PM EST
                                                         I am not sure what NT_AUTHORITY is - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2004, 08:42:31 PM EST
                                                             Except: - (FuManChu) - (2) - Jan. 5, 2004, 01:55:07 AM EST
                                                                 RIght you are -NT - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 5, 2004, 07:18:30 AM EST
                                                                 Bottom line - (pwhysall) - Jan. 5, 2004, 07:20:06 AM EST
                     Careful there . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - Jan. 1, 2004, 12:31:49 PM EST
                         Does it really? - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Jan. 1, 2004, 01:53:29 PM EST
                             I don't remember all the details . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 1, 2004, 02:23:54 PM EST
                                 The licenses are more forgiving than you think - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 1, 2004, 02:48:58 PM EST
                                     Really interesting issue - (orion) - Jan. 1, 2004, 03:27:39 PM EST
                         Bah! I'll make it freeware then. - (orion) - Jan. 1, 2004, 02:07:29 PM EST
                     that's what I did - (SpiceWare) - Jan. 2, 2004, 12:36:33 PM EST

Consider the job: to build a structure based on live bone and meat that has to perform under extreme forces in one of the most corrosive environments on the planet. Has to look good too.
118 ms