IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Boolean algebra
The conclusion seems to be correct, as evident from the truth tables:

Original expression, first term makes it false for 11, second for 10 and third for 01.
For 00, the original gives true.

so, reduction to a'b' is justified


(a' + b')(a' + b)(a + b') =

(a' + b'a' + a'b + b'b)(a + b') =

(a' + b'a' + a'b + 0) =

(a' + b'a' + a'b)(a + b') =

a'a + b'a'a + a'ba + a'b' + b'a'b' + a'bb' =

0 + 0 + 0 + a'b' + b'a' + 0 = a'b' + a'b' =

a'b'
--

The rich, as usual, are employing the elected.
-- [link|http://unfit2print.blogspot.com/|http://unfit2print.blogspot.com/]
New Well, it was my leading candidate
for the right answer;)

Weird... when I write it down w/ pen and paper, I get all screwed up, but as soon as I'm typing it, it becomes a lot clearer. The mind works in mysterious ways...

Thanks.
--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
     Boolean algebra - (jake123) - (7)
         b' == not b ? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1)
             Yes. -NT - (jake123)
         Re: Boolean algebra - (Arkadiy) - (1)
             Well, it was my leading candidate - (jake123)
         If you use a Karnaugh map, you'll see you're OK. - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
             Speaking of which - (ChrisR) - (1)
                 Speaking of which^2 - (jake123)

Battling him is like wiping off puppy slobber.
151 ms