More fun with the One
- (FuManChu)
- (20)
- Nov. 15, 2003, 12:54:51 AM EST
Synchonicity
- (deSitter)
- (17)
- Nov. 15, 2003, 01:25:02 AM EST
When it's aNonymous, I usually do. Otherwise, nope.
-NT
- (FuManChu)
- (16)
- Nov. 15, 2003, 02:09:57 AM EST
I see
- (deSitter)
- (15)
- Nov. 15, 2003, 02:13:28 AM EST
Not the point.
- (FuManChu)
- (14)
- Nov. 15, 2003, 06:10:44 AM EST
Here's a suggestion that will solve your problem
- (jb4)
- (13)
- Nov. 17, 2003, 05:23:53 PM EST
Re: Here's a suggestion that will solve your problem
- (deSitter)
- Nov. 17, 2003, 05:30:07 PM EST
No, no, I'm swinging *back* from that
- (FuManChu)
- (11)
- Nov. 18, 2003, 05:42:16 AM EST
Sorry, No Sale
- (jb4)
- (10)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 11:14:20 AM EST
That would imply that YOU don't use dynamic languages
- (ben_tilly)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 11:24:24 AM EST
What Ben said...
- (admin)
- (8)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 11:49:22 AM EST
Even C++ allows defining in scope...
- (ChrisR)
- (1)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 11:53:02 AM EST
My two sense...
- (Simon_Jester)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 03:12:33 PM EST
Well,
- (jb4)
- (5)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 01:59:05 PM EST
Re: I write in what I get PAID to write in
- (FuManChu)
- (1)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 04:09:54 PM EST
You're clearly NOT a contractor, then...
-NT
- (jb4)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 05:26:50 PM EST
I don't.
- (admin)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 05:14:44 PM EST
must be nice to have real work
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 07:57:13 PM EST
I'll bet it is too
- (tuberculosis)
- Nov. 19, 2003, 11:47:21 PM EST
Variable names.
- (static)
- (1)
- Nov. 15, 2003, 10:03:27 AM EST
"$a_later_time, $an_even_later_time..."? ObSentientLRPD!
- (CRConrad)
- Nov. 15, 2003, 02:14:57 PM EST
