Jim would be a dangerous name

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #124,311 by JayMehaffey 11/5/03 2:32:18 PM Reply	Jim would be a dangerous name Just think of the conversational danger here. SO: "What are you doing?" You: "Sucking Jim off the net" Jay
Post #124,313 by drewk 11/5/03 2:37:47 PM Reply	Or ... "Dammit, Jim is going down again." Or ... "Man, I just can't seem to keep Jim up." === Implicitly condoning stupidity since 2001.
Post #124,317 by folkert 11/5/03 2:48:27 PM Reply	... Jim: The OS that it is immune to STD[1], but just a carrier... and just keeps working... and working... 1 = Smtp Transmitted Decrepitude[2] 2 = As opposed to Windowz just BEING a disease. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* [insert witty saying here]
Post #124,319 by admin 11/5/03 2:51:33 PM Reply	Good for Jim, though... Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

How stable is Mozilla Thunderbird at this point? -NT - (inthane-chan) - (10) - Nov. 4, 2003, 05:32:04 PM EST

I've not had any trouble with it, but it's not my primary... -NT - (Another Scott) - Nov. 4, 2003, 05:40:15 PM EST

Can't someone just name a piece of software "Jim"? - (deSitter) - (8) - Nov. 4, 2003, 06:28:45 PM EST

no, don't - (Steve Lowe) - Nov. 4, 2003, 06:34:00 PM EST

Never happen - (jake123) - (2) - Nov. 5, 2003, 01:04:38 PM EST

But what about... - (folkert) - (1) - Nov. 5, 2003, 01:13:42 PM EST

You bastard! -NT - (Yendor) - Nov. 5, 2003, 01:19:43 PM EST

Jim would be a dangerous name - (JayMehaffey) - (3) - Nov. 5, 2003, 02:32:18 PM EST

Or ... - (drewk) - (2) - Nov. 5, 2003, 02:37:47 PM EST

... - (folkert) - Nov. 5, 2003, 02:48:27 PM EST

Good for Jim, though... -NT - (admin) - Nov. 5, 2003, 02:51:33 PM EST

Exterminate!
75 ms