This time it's the turn of the Sydney Morning Herald to have a go.

[link|http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/10/10/1065676145670.html|This article] is the result. I do like the comment about the author being in 'protective custody'. :-) I'm not sure how long the article will stay online, I think about 7 days is the SMH's average.

The article has a few porky pies on both sides of the equation, but I guess it's an indicator of what 'normal people' think on the issue at the moment. (Well, those that don't think 'well who the hell cares?'...)