1 in 6 manuf. jobs gone despite "recovery" - (deSitter) - (15) - Aug. 31, 2003, 10:41:49 PM EDT
         Disagree on one point, Ross - (jb4) - (4) - Sept. 1, 2003, 11:04:24 AM EDT
             Hey! - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Sept. 1, 2003, 11:17:05 AM EDT
                 Oooops! My Bad! - (jb4) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2003, 01:16:51 PM EDT
                     :D -NT - (inthane-chan) - Sept. 1, 2003, 01:22:25 PM EDT
             Not likely - (JayMehaffey) - Sept. 1, 2003, 02:34:40 PM EDT
         The sig is the message - (FuManChu) - Sept. 1, 2003, 01:45:45 PM EDT
         Better solution - (JayMehaffey) - (8) - Sept. 1, 2003, 02:39:50 PM EDT
             That is, of course, the solution . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Sept. 1, 2003, 03:02:40 PM EDT
                 dunno - (deSitter) - (1) - Sept. 1, 2003, 03:37:00 PM EDT
                     Cause turnabout is fair play - (JayMehaffey) - Sept. 1, 2003, 07:36:23 PM EDT
             Er.. we'd have to 'believe' in those things here - first (?) -NT - (Ashton) - Sept. 1, 2003, 04:08:44 PM EDT
             Tarrifs for values - (kmself) - (3) - Sept. 1, 2003, 07:35:01 PM EDT
                 easier method. Tax profits - (boxley) - (2) - Sept. 1, 2003, 10:39:27 PM EDT
                     Interesting ideas. On Nike. - (Another Scott) - Sept. 1, 2003, 11:12:30 PM EDT
                     Nope. Provide incentives for benefits. - (kmself) - Sept. 1, 2003, 11:52:00 PM EDT