Don't you have to first be elected to be re-elected?

--\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca *\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca] [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\n* Kingston Ontario Canada [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------

and could not possibly simulate.

You would compare the "speed of discovery of deception" in '03 to the sleepy Eisenhower era !? (another time about which all your info is filtered through My Gramma's ancient cant + your own wet dreams of PNAC-vistas to conquer)

And you want.. these 'Bad Losers' (of all those 2M jobs and so infinitely much Else, since your neoconmen thugs stopped the vote count in FL, and the USSC reversed all their previously 'held' 'principles' - in perhaps the most convuluted explanatory 'rationale' ever to come from there).

To simply "accept the robbery" with Grace.
(any more than Nixon should have.. had he the chance of obtaining proof: Goose/Gander) Screw your 'statistical beneficence', as only a CPA might love / or an Eloi.)

That's All you want, bunky ??

Hey, best hop that C5A and get Your mitts right on that Tar Baby; Mano-a-Mano, Big Guy: let's see how your rhetoric flies in a crowd of benficiaries of your Nintendo-Eloi strategy.

[Hah] a Chicken Hawk trading a comfy Corp joystick and that hamster wheel in the cubicle - for anything more Hazardous than a possible cold from some elevator sneeze?

Post #115,364 by mmoffitt 8/25/03 9:40:55 PM Reply	Don't you have to first be elected to be re-elected? bcnu, Mikem The soul and substance of what customarily ranks as patriotism is moral cowardice and always has been...We have thrown away the most valuable asset we had-- the individual's right to oppose both flag and country when he (just he, by himself) believed them to be in the wrong. We have thrown it away; and with it all that was really respectable about that grotesque and laughable word, Patriotism. - Mark Twain, "Monarchical and Republican Patriotism"
Post #115,393 by Ashton 8/26/03 5:01:26 AM Reply	Hmmm - think Insurrection VS Resurrection?
Post #115,487 by boxley 8/26/03 9:41:37 PM Reply	Dunno, ask Nixon 1962 electoral schmoral ya gotta steal it when its close, evens for kennedy. thanx, bill America, Love it or give it back questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #115,523 by Simon_Jester 8/27/03 8:04:25 AM Reply	Don't you mean Ford?
Post #115,623 by boxley 8/27/03 8:58:46 PM Reply	Nope, Kennedy stole the election from Nixon fair and square, the electorals were rigged in both chicago and texas by the dems. Nixon was told by the party not to fight it. It was as close as bore gush. thanx, bill America, Love it or give it back questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #116,609 by marlowe 9/4/03 3:16:22 PM Reply	An instructive comparison/contrast. Richard Nixon... Richard Nixon! lost with more grace than the Gorebots. Think about that, sore losers. You're actually showing less class and civic spirit than Tricky Dick did in comparable circumstances. You're actually making that bastard look good by comparison. By the way, a little uncertainty or even fraud here and there is statistically inevitable, and ususally statistically insignificant. 1960 and 2000 were both ties, as I see them. Nobody stole either election. The only difference is how the losing side responded. And oh, what a difference. ---------------------------------------------------------------- DEAL WITH IT. Americans: a pack, not a herd. Never mind all the mass graves. Where's the nerve gas? [link\|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html\|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
Post #116,617 by jake123 9/4/03 4:02:36 PM Reply	More grace? Wasn't that when he said "you guys won't have Richard Nixon to kick around anymore!!!"? --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #116,618 by boxley 9/4/03 4:12:02 PM Reply	that was as eisenhower's sidekick in 1958 or when he ran for governor of California earlier. thanx, bill America, Love it or give it back questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]
Post #116,620 by jake123 9/4/03 4:17:56 PM Reply	Ah. Perhaps not as up on US political trivia as I should be;) --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #116,795 by GBert 9/5/03 4:12:38 PM Reply	But wait -- the irony of it all! Did I miss something? AFAIK (I'm not old enough to remember :)), 1960 was when Nixon said "you won't have Nixon to kick around any more"... Giovanni I'm not a complete idiot -- some parts are missing
Post #116,800 by Another Scott 9/5/03 4:46:05 PM Reply	Hey Giovanni! Good to see you posting. 'twas 1962. [link\|http://www.bartleby.com/63/68/8268.html\|Bartleby]: QUOTATION:\tYou won\ufffdt have Nixon to kick around anymore, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference. ATTRIBUTION:\tAfter his defeat in California gubernatorial election, 7 Nov 62 Cheers, Scott.
Post #116,801 by GBert 9/5/03 5:07:50 PM Reply	Thanks! And thanks for the info. I didn't even know Nixon had run for gov in California in 62! Freddie Widgeon had nothing on California... 'Do you know,' said a thoughtful Bean,'I'll bet that if all the girls Freddie has loved and lost were placed end to end--not that I suppose one could do it--they would reach half-way down Piccadilly.' 'Further than that,' said the Egg. 'Some of them were pretty tall.' Giovanni I'm not a complete idiot -- some parts are missing
Post #116,621 by marlowe 9/4/03 4:19:55 PM Reply	Yes. And that would be a step up for the Gorebots... if they were to say the same of Gore, and then leave it at that. ---------------------------------------------------------------- DEAL WITH IT. Americans: a pack, not a herd. Never mind all the mass graves. Where's the nerve gas? [link\|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html\|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
Post #116,634 by Nightowl 9/4/03 5:26:40 PM Reply	Re: Yes. And that would be a step up for the Gorebots... Gorebots? LOL!!!!!! Too funny! Nightowl >8# "I learned to be the door, instead of the mat!" "illegitimi nil carborundum" Comment by Nightowl
Post #116,700 by Ashton 9/5/03 12:08:33 AM Reply	Grace.. a word you've only ever heard about - and could not possibly simulate. You would compare the "speed of discovery of deception" in '03 to the sleepy Eisenhower era !? (another time about which all your info is filtered through My Gramma's ancient cant + your own wet dreams of PNAC-vistas to conquer) And you want.. these 'Bad Losers' (of all those 2M jobs and so infinitely much Else, since your neoconmen thugs stopped the vote count in FL, and the USSC reversed all their previously 'held' 'principles' - in perhaps the most convuluted explanatory 'rationale' ever to come from there). To simply "accept the robbery" with Grace. (any more than Nixon should have.. had he the chance of obtaining proof: Goose/Gander) Screw your 'statistical beneficence', as only a CPA might love / or an Eloi.) That's All you want, bunky ?? Hey, best hop that C5A and get Your mitts right on that Tar Baby; Mano-a-Mano, Big Guy: let's see how your rhetoric flies in a crowd of benficiaries of your Nintendo-Eloi strategy. [Hah] a Chicken Hawk trading a comfy Corp joystick and that hamster wheel in the cubicle - for anything more Hazardous than a possible cold from some elevator sneeze? "Man, I love it when the complete absence of a plan comes together." - Ernie the Attorney
Post #115,624 by Another Scott 8/27/03 9:02:40 PM Reply	You mean 1960, of course. :-)
Post #115,627 by boxley 8/27/03 9:05:54 PM Reply	right decade anyway :-) America, Love it or give it back questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org]

Welcome to IWETHEY!