IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Earnest, perhaps a tad premature.
That is.. if the world is non-radioactive in about another year: his instinct might be right.

Competent is how I'd describe Mr. Bush's actions thus far - and I admit, surprisingly so. But I think the present enigma demands more than competence; requires both great skill with language, great perceptiveness of world history and yes, actual wisdom on many scales.

(Nor do I assume Gore possessed of such - but we will never know how he also, might have risen to the occasion. Or not.)



A.
New Bush's greatest asset
Bush's greatest asset is to get out of the way and let those who know how to run the store actually run the store.
jb4
(Resistance is not futile...)
Expand Edited by jb4 Oct. 2, 2001, 08:57:44 AM EDT
New Thank God
..that Washington, Jackson, Polk, Lincoln, Roosevelt 1, Wilson, and Roosevelt 2 had better virtues. Only Nixon and Johnson can claim cretin-league-ship with the Bushes.
New Wilson - The president who brought Segregation to
DC and the Federal Government.

[link|http://www.dol.gov/asp/programs/history/shfgpr00.htm|Here].

The Labor Department's engagement with the nation's Negroes developed in the context of an Administration that was at best unsympathetic to their rights and needs. The White House of Woodrow Wilson and the Executive branch were filled with conservative Southern Democrats, a group that also dominated Congress. Washington was resistant to meeting the rising expectations of the Negro community and workforce.

During the 1912 presidential campaign Wilson, a progressive Southern Democrat, had encouraged Negro support with vague promises to be "President of the whole nation" and to provide Negroes with "absolute fair dealing." He specifically promised that he would at least match past Republican appointments of Negroes to patronage positions. The NAACP endorsed Wilson and Negro groups worked vigorously for his election. Wilson's victory was mainly attributable to the Taft-Roosevelt split and the Negro vote was not decisive. Yet Negroes were proud of their involvement in the campaign and, heartened by the idealism of Wilson's inaugural address, looked forward to turning vague campaign promises into concrete advances for working Negroes and the whole race.

Hard political, social and racial realities lurked to counter this hopefulness once the inaugural euphoria dissipated. Wilson, despite his campaign promises of racial fairness, remained a man of the South and shared the paternalistic if benevolent racism of the men and women of his patrician class. Wilson also needed the support of Southern Democrats with strongly anti-Negro views if his ambitious program of progressive economic reform was to be enacted. This was his over-riding goal and, as historian Kendrick Clements wrote, "Wilson's attitude was always that there were more important issues to be pursued than racial justice."

Anti-Negro forces soon held the upper hand in Washington and Jim Crow began to hold sway. Negro patronage declined markedly from the low, token levels of previous Administrations. Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan broke a precedent of many years by appointing a white as ambassador to Haiti. Wilson himself appointed only two Negroes in his first two years in office while allowing a total of 12 positions filled by Negroes appointed by President Taft to lapse into white hands.

Patronage had an important but largely symbolic value to the Negro community, whereas the government's treatment of its own Negro workers had a direct impact. At a Cabinet meeting early in the Administration, Southern members expressed disingenuous concern over alleged friction between Negro and white government employees. Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson, a Texan, proposed segregating the races to eliminate the supposed problem. Secretary of the Treasury William Gibbs McAdoo supported him. Burleson also claimed support for the idea from moderate Negro leaders such as Bishop Alexander Walters, president of the National Colored Democratic League. The rest of the Cabinet, along with the President, while not explicitly endorsing segregation, did not oppose it.

Some departments adopted the policy with a vengeance. Burleson immediately set out on a program to segregate, downgrade and, in some cases, discharge Negro workers. All of them but one were transferred to the dead letter office, and the Negro who remained had the humiliating experience of being surrounded by screens so that white workers would not have to look at him. Burleson also ordered segregated window service to the public. Fortunately segregation was not widely adopted elsewhere in the federal government. Many departments either failed to institute the practice or actively resisted it. Assistant Secretary of Labor Louis F. Post was a founder of the NAACP and his department was another that remained relatively free of the taint of Jim Crow.


People are often products of their time. And one's view is often tainted by what one views as important - "Where you stand depends on where you sit."

Cheers,
Scott.
New Idiotic Polemics. The man wanted world gov't.
Of course, you can't understand.
New You're pretty predictable yourself....
New Nit re: 'great skill with language'
I know those of us who believe ourselves to have a way with the language tend to see it as a prerequisite for any number of things. But when it comes to international relations, we're dealing with people who don't even speak the same language. I think in general the specific words we chose will be lost in the translation as often as not.

The big exception, of course, being the use of the word "crusade." Easy to jump on with 20/20/ hindsight, but in the heat of the moment, under the glare of spotlights and cameras, isn't it possible any one of us might have temporarily forgotten the etymology of the word?
We have to fight the terrorists as if there were no rules and preserve our open society as if there were no terrorists. -- [link|http://www.nytimes.com/2001/04/05/opinion/BIO-FRIEDMAN.html|Thomas Friedman]
New There's a distinction.
Of the Jacob Brownowski kind.. skill within any language is at least ~ translatable, just as translations of great works manage to capture the essence. (Occasionally works with poetry even..)

Ineptness in language - is never improved except by intentional mistranslation. (I suspect that a fair amount of this 'editing' occurs re Dubya's off-the-TelePrompter remarks, anyway -- for overseas consumption).

'Crusade' was a major major gaffe - and almost certainly due to both lingual AND historical ignorance on the part of our Harvard Daddy's-son MBA C-student. I hope he learned a lot from the power of just One word ill-used, to cancel out thousands of better ones.

A.
     Admitting a mistake - (Fearless Freep) - (41)
         Re: Admitting a mistake - (wharris2) - (18)
             dunno - (boxley)
             Oh Sure. Sure. Keep telling yourself that. - (deSitter) - (16)
                 self-generated crisis? - (wharris2) - (15)
                     YOU IDIOT! PRAISING REAGAN??? - (deSitter) - (14)
                         Self generated crisis? - (bepatient) - (11)
                             Re: Self generated crisis? - (pwhysall)
                             Some sources disagree... - (Simon_Jester) - (8)
                                 Haven't seen them... - (bepatient) - (7)
                                     See if I can find it but.... - (Fearless Freep)
                                     According to the sources I read (I'm looking for them...) - (Simon_Jester) - (5)
                                         Source I was thinking of... - (Simon_Jester) - (4)
                                             Still... - (bepatient) - (3)
                                                 Here's one supporting this... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                     Good one... - (bepatient)
                                                 A very long time.... - (Simon_Jester)
                             Not a bad plan... - (jb4)
                         Re: YOU IDIOT! PRAISING REAGAN??? - (wharris2)
                         ? - (JayMehaffey)
         Earnest, perhaps a tad premature. - (Ashton) - (7)
             Bush's greatest asset - (jb4) - (4)
                 Thank God - (deSitter) - (3)
                     Wilson - The president who brought Segregation to - (Another Scott) - (2)
                         Idiotic Polemics. The man wanted world gov't. - (deSitter) - (1)
                             You're pretty predictable yourself.... -NT - (Another Scott)
             Nit re: 'great skill with language' - (drewk) - (1)
                 There's a distinction. - (Ashton)
         Idiocy -NT - (deSitter)
         I'm really, really, really sick of this. - (mmoffitt) - (12)
             Umm.. He didn't end the planet...yet anyway. - (hnick) - (4)
                 Just wondering... - (jb4)
                 Sad commentary is: he's given credit for Not - (Ashton) - (2)
                     You think that credit is owed to him? - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                         Our hope lies in a Fact: - (Ashton)
             And what the fuck do/did you expect him to do? - (wharris2) - (6)
                 FAA especially - (Ashton) - (2)
                     STATE DEPARTMENT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                         Re: STATE DEPARTMENT - (wharris2)
                 My point. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                     You don't win a war by bombing - (wharris2) - (1)
                         Firebombing Kabul - (kmself)

Are you scared yet?
131 ms