IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New The official response was (more or less)...
"Hmm. Router change. Not gonna happen."

So no port 8080 for us. I'll email the company we're trying to get to, but don't anticipate a lot of change.

On the plus side: the act nobody I know has ever used this company's support site indicates we wouldn't get anything useful out of it anyway :)
John. Busy lad.
New Re: The official response was (more or less)...
The sign of a secure installation would have been "You want us to open up port 25OR624 for a web service. OK, we'll get back to you when it's done. Note: we are rather picky about security - keep us informed. We'll be watching."
-drl
New I could pursue it through official channels,
but since it looks like it's not something we Really Must Have, I'll just grizzle at the software vendor and be done with it.
John. Busy lad.
New It's a right wally-woo world, mate
-drl
New "Ours is not to reason why..."
The odds of that response being code for "It's too hard to fix" are quite good. :-)

Wade.

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

New Either that, or too much paperwork :)
John. Busy lad.
New I imagine that would qualify as "too hard". :-)

Is it enough to love
Is it enough to breathe
Somebody rip my heart out
And leave me here to bleed
 
Is it enough to die
Somebody save my life
I'd rather be Anything but Ordinary
Please

-- "Anything but Ordinary" by Avril Lavigne.

     Would most corporate firewalls block port 8080? - (Meerkat) - (14)
         8080 is the Web-Caching (Proxy) port - (folkert) - (4)
             Cool. So blocking it would be a thing most companies do. - (Meerkat) - (3)
                 Use a wacko port - (deSitter) - (2)
                     No. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         OK that works -NT - (deSitter)
         I wouldn't have thought so. - (static) - (7)
             The official response was (more or less)... - (Meerkat) - (6)
                 Re: The official response was (more or less)... - (deSitter) - (2)
                     I could pursue it through official channels, - (Meerkat) - (1)
                         It's a right wally-woo world, mate -NT - (deSitter)
                 "Ours is not to reason why..." - (static) - (2)
                     Either that, or too much paperwork :) -NT - (Meerkat) - (1)
                         I imagine that would qualify as "too hard". :-) -NT - (static)
         FWFW - (kmself)

And, of course, steaming poo...
63 ms