IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Not sure how to put this tactfully
Do you 'Partners' keep in touch er subrosa ??

Isn't time approaching for some coordinated unCivil disobedience? (Also involving a war party to Wash DC about the implications).

Given just the above (rather complete) list and the implications which even a Martian could deduce, never even having seen Ballmer dance: don't you call such a position plain old untenable? (I mean - for you guys to even pretend to 'play', for much longer)

I'm naive, but - doesn't, "we all hang together or assuredly each hangs separately" - still ring a few bells with your peers? Frankly, I can't see how even the smarter folk on this list can salvage a livelihood much longer, without *some* organized opposition to this Taliban of IT.

Putting this stuff together is kinda like watching that 767 bank in slo-mo and hit that tower, over and over.. However many times I hear the scenario, it doesn't compute! I keep hearing that these biz-MBAs have *NO IDEA* what it means: to permanently lose control of your very own basic company *data* ??

{sheesh}

Recession --> Depression --> world techno-center moves irreversibly to Eur-Asia within 2-4 years

Yessss Redmond == Mordor, my preciousssss

New Depends on your "partnership" level.
I have no concerns whatever. My level of "partnership" (was "OEM Partner", now "System Builder") required me to register with Microsoft for permission to buy 5-packs of Windows 95 from Ingram or Tech Data (registration is no longer required, but I still have a "partner number").

I no longer buy multi-packs because I never need that many copys of Windows any more, and getting Windows from my mother board supplier is a couple bucks cheaper anyway.

"Partner" levels that require substantial investment in time, training and products should be very concerned indeed, and I think most are. "Commoditization" is a major problem.

As a columnist in ENT (Enterprise NT) magazine put it about a year ago, "You're making good money on 2000 now, but in a year or two everyone else in your area will be competing with the exact same services - profits will plunge." His recommendation? "Start learning Linux now".

Now, in addition, Microsoft has made it clear - the more substantial a "partner" you are, the more direct competition from Microsoft you will encounter. Big "partners" serving major corporate clients will be hit the hardest.

I have been saying for years that Microsoft would eventually be comming after that money. Their need for rapidly increasing revenue is endless.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New Ahh thanks, see: just the Ostrich syndrome. Again.
Whereby otherwise quite intelligent folk continue to say to selves.. Oh.. I see how they could fuck over B, C & D but - surely - they won't come for *moi* !?

Now if a year ago, and within these (various) ranks -- someone was already positing Linux as about the only escape in sight - I'm assuming that all these 'Partners' heard that suggestion at least a few times from other intelligent ept cohorts, too:

It's then just plain Darwin !!

So no need to waste sympathy as these guys trade in the Beemers for 4-year old Escorts, next. (But Can they: learn / from \\ in time? Tell customers: "let M$ support you next.. we're bailing.." ??)



A.
     Register: MS moves to head off Linux desktop 'threat' - (kmself) - (8)
         That's a different bunch. - (Andrew Grygus) - (7)
             Might be a tricky line to walk. -NT - (static) - (5)
                 Indeed yes. - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                     Not sure how to put this tactfully - (Ashton) - (2)
                         Depends on your "partnership" level. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                             Ahh thanks, see: just the Ostrich syndrome. Again. - (Ashton)
                     It is for these sorts of things I never became an MCSE. - (static)
             MCP is not hard - (JayMehaffey)

Do I get extra points for using the word thing three times in one sentence?
40 ms