If you do the mathematics properly in each case, you'll end up with the same answer. But the latter are much more general than the former and can more easily be extended to more complicated shed and sheet shapes (E.g. a chicken-shaped shed covered by Escher blocks). That's what SmallTalk and the like try to do.
I've never been able to say exactly why I love these weird languages so much, but I think you identified the main issue - they appeal to the mathematical instinct. For example, APL and FORTH both are a basic set of operators (in FORTH they are called "words") that can be combined to make more operators. A program is thus a collection of operators. In the end, the system is the same after development as it was before, only it has more operators (in FORTH, more words). So, solving a problem amounts to supplying the missing operators.
Did Smalltalk have a single creator, like FORTH and APL?