FYI, I can't recall (and don't think) that I did.

Be that as it may -- just because someone blantantly misread you, doesn't mean that you're not totally insane.

That happens ALL THE FUCKING TIME with you, doesn't it?

Since *everybody* "misunderstands" you most of the time, that means the problem isn't with everybody else's powers of perception, but your execrable expression.

(And let's leave my anal alliterationism out of this, OK?)

Bryce tries to put the blame on others, as usual:

I think that non-OO minds just process information different than OO minds.

Has nothing whatsoever with "OO minds" or "non-OO minds"; such a distinction probably doesn't even exist in the real world.

The difference is between stupid and non-stupid minds, and I don't know how to upgrade yours from the former to the latter.

But for the sake of argument, suppose you were right,

No "argument" about it, no "suppose" about it -- I am right.

and that it is my text techniques.

That's what

Since *everybody* "misunderstands" you most of the time, that means the problem isn't with everybody else's powers of perception, but your execrable expression.

means.

How would I have prevented it in this case? I see no clear flaws in my text that would have triggered such a response.

I can't remember the specifics any more, but if it was like they usually are (and I think if it weren't, I would have remembered), it was all flaws.

HTH!