IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 8 of 79
[Prev] 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 79 [Next]
     New site is snappy - (drook) - (2)
         Yes it is! - (Another Scott)
         Got a (rare) Safari error message - (Ashton)
     Anybody familiar with Liferay? - (mmoffitt)
     Back to Firefox for me. - (Another Scott) - (10)
         Yeah, I'm thinking that, too. - (static) - (1)
             google the noun, is a tool, the adjective -NT - (boxley)
         Seems to have been TabsOutliner... - (Another Scott) - (7)
             Bah. That wasn't it. Gremlins I guess... -NT - (Another Scott) - (6)
                 Supposed to be fixed in v34 - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     So... - (folkert) - (3)
                         It's not Winders. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                             It has never stopped working for me here - (jake123) - (1)
                                 It's not consistently missing for me. Hoping v34 fixes it. -NT - (Another Scott)
                     Version "34.0.1847.116 m" is out on Winders. - (Another Scott)
     Help? - (hnick) - (12)
         Drook set me up on WordPress on DreamHost. - (Another Scott) - (10)
             I'm not advertising it (currently) but yeah I can do it - (drook) - (9)
                 Good man! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                 That would be great! - (hnick) - (7)
                     Details - (drook) - (6)
                         Looks good. I'll probaby have some questions... - (hnick) - (5)
                             Email sent -NT - (drook) - (4)
                                 Re: Email sent - (hnick) - (3)
                                     Do not overpromise - (crazy)
                                     Should be, yes - (drook) - (1)
                                         WordPress... Don't know. - (hnick)
         Hola Hugh.. - (Ashton)
     Just switched DNS on my site - (drook) - (20)
         add.com to your link -NT - (crazy) - (2)
             Fixed ... wow I'm losing it -NT - (drook) - (1)
                 can't lose what you never had - (crazy)
         very nice -NT - (boxley)
         Looking good! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         I'm finding so much that's broken ... - (drook) - (2)
             This might be useful for you: - (malraux) - (1)
                 Google Webmaster Tools has it - (drook)
         Can't speak to the ordinates & abscissae, but it Flies nice. - (Ashton) - (3)
             I'm trying to leave things to the right experts - (drook) - (2)
                 Smart man. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Excellent.. some Gov's just may realize ... the cost of ego. -NT - (Ashton)
         Anyone seeing ads on the site? - (drook) - (7)
             No ads visible here with Chrome. - (Another Scott)
             Nada here.. but-- - (Ashton)
             Appears to be working now. -NT - (scoenye) - (4)
                 I see them on the Blog, but not on the home page. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                     Thanks, waiting to hear back from a support ticket - (drook) - (2)
                         Saw 1 blog ad.. - (Ashton) - (1)
                             I'm not liking exelator - (drook)
     Need CSS help - (drook) - (15)
         Found a solution - (drook) - (3)
             Interesting. - (Another Scott)
             My "solution" needs more work - (drook) - (1)
                 The plot thickens! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         Instead of floating - (scoenye) - (10)
             DUDE! YES! - (drook) - (9)
                 Yay! - (scoenye) - (8)
                     Not sure what bulge you mean? -NT - (drook) - (7)
                         Re: Not sure what bulge you mean? - (scoenye) - (6)
                             The height, yes ... but you mentioned width vs max-width? -NT - (drook) - (5)
                                 Ah. No, different bulge. - (scoenye) - (4)
                                     I don't see that happening in Firefox - (drook) - (3)
                                         Hmmm... - (scoenye)
                                         't was an artefact. The saved page used a different font. - (scoenye) - (1)
                                             Cool, thanks for the follow-up -NT - (drook)
     Verizon using Net Nutrality to kill Netflix (and AWS) - (drook) - (8)
         That didn't take long. - (a6l6e6x)
         Why is google so fast? - (boxley) - (4)
             Not up to the service providers. - (malraux) - (3)
                 Pretty much my POV on that - (jake123) - (2)
                     I had the cake line in my post and deleted it :-) - (malraux)
                     Well said, both of you. -NT - (Another Scott)
         Does Verizon really want to upset AWS? - (static) - (1)
             Looks like collateral damage -NT - (drook)
     How to access a blocked port - (drook) - (16)
         your ISP doesn't offer webmail access? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             Yes, but no filtering that way - (drook)
         SSH port forwarding? - (scoenye) - (10)
             Will try to set that up - (drook) - (9)
                 Setup SSH to *ALSO*... - (folkert) - (8)
                     Been reading docs and I'm not clear - (drook) - (7)
                         Curveball - would you accept a webmail solution? - (pwhysall) - (3)
                             Are there any that learn spam? -NT - (drook) - (2)
                                 Nah - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                     I don't control the mailserver -NT - (drook)
                         Re: Been reading docs and I'm not clear - (folkert) - (2)
                             Will try next time I'm at work... home because of snow today -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                 You can "try it" at home to verify... - (folkert)
         tcprelay - (crazy) - (2)
             Looks promising, thanks -NT - (drook) - (1)
                 Not as promising as one might think. - (folkert)
     Google -vs- Beast ... exchanging Exchange expeditiously - (Ashton) - (31)
         Good luck to them - (scoenye) - (30)
             Zooks! :-( -NT - (Another Scott)
             That tells me that Group security was patched-on. - (static) - (28)
                 There never was a plan, but they're not the only ones... - (scoenye) - (27)
                     Horrorshow. :-( Thanks for that last sentence! :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                     I think Google has a love-hate relationship with corporates. - (static) - (2)
                         I have 8 personal GMails and 1 work - (malraux)
                         Yep - (pwhysall)
                     Fascinating + Confusing.. that's fun--but only at parties. - (Ashton) - (22)
                         Close - (drook) - (18)
                             Shorter is better :-) -NT - (boxley)
                             Not just MS. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                                 ARM the CPU architecture? - (drook) - (4)
                                     It's where all the growth is, and no MS tax. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                         Neat, hadn't heard about that - (drook)
                                     Re: ARM the CPU architecture? - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                         Seems like MS doesn't care even if you do. - (crazy)
                                 I think your argument is from ten years ago. - (pwhysall) - (5)
                                     ..__--oo000oo--__.. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                         MS really, really don't care about Linux on PCs - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                             Linus probably doesn't care much about Linux on PCs either. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                 Re: Linus probably doesn't care much about Linux on PCs eith - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                     Re: Linus probably doesn't care much about Linux on PCs eith - (Another Scott)
                             Ah I C: takes lots fewer words when you already know several - (Ashton) - (4)
                                 No special insight here - (drook) - (3)
                                     That's a useful start, but.. - (Ashton) - (1)
                                         Oh, I don't *believe* what they say - (drook)
                                     Great description of what I (try to) do - (drook)
                         Re: Fascinating + Confusing.. that's fun--but only at partie - (scoenye) - (2)
                             Rofl. :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                             Hey! that's a Good error message.. - (Ashton)
     Any ideas why Evolution isn't flagging spam? - (drook) - (3)
         can't say. I use spam classification on the server - (folkert)
         Ok... here goes. - (folkert) - (1)
             custom headers for junk ... yup, got that set - (drook)
Now viewing page 8 of 79
[Prev] 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 79 [Next]

*SHUN*
606 ms