IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 3 of 25
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 25 [Next]
     So does 'DEFERRABLE' not work in postgres? - (tuberculosis) - (5)
         Possibly not a bug: - (admin) - (4)
             The naming convention is a bug in itself - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                 Removes the need for SET CONSTRAINTS - (admin) - (2)
                     Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -thx - (tuberculosis) - (1)
                         Re: Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -th - (admin)
     PostgreSQL backup and restore strategies - (tuberculosis) - (5)
         Re: PostgreSQL backup and restore strategies - (Yendor)
         Ditto on Mike - (admin) - (3)
             ddl is easy - (tuberculosis) - (2)
                 Re: ddl is easy - (Yendor)
                 If the issue is - (crazy)
     Need some postgresql help! - (mmoffitt) - (1)
         Does this help? - (Another Scott)
     Temp tables in Postgresql. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
         Can't you specify nocache on the sproc? -NT - (drewk) - (2)
             Thanks, Drew. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                 I thot it was s'posed to be the gigglecache on the haverproc - (jake123)
     Man I hate OODBMS's - (tuberculosis) - (14)
         *snicker* - (ubernostrum) - (11)
             All about abstractions - (drewk) - (10)
                 Yeah. - (ubernostrum)
                 Abstractions can be good. - (static) - (8)
                     Uuhhh ... - (drewk) - (7)
                         I'm not sure where your point is. - (static) - (6)
                             Everything is not an object - (drewk) - (5)
                                 Ah. - (static) - (3)
                                     Don't take *just* my word for it - (drewk) - (2)
                                         a lttle dabble do ya, folks around here like it dabble.org -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             Its not an oodbms - (tuberculosis)
                                 Lists are objects - (tuberculosis)
         Why? - (tablizer) - (1)
             You have it backwards - I agree with you on this - (tuberculosis)
     postgresql security question. - (mmoffitt)
     way for end-users to view Oracle record locks? - (SpiceWare) - (5)
         got a lead - (SpiceWare) - (4)
             I can't do that - (drewk) - (3)
                 I seem to recall - (broomberg)
                 It does bug me, but - (SpiceWare)
                 It's a synonym - (SpiceWare)
     Can anyone tell me what kind of SQL language this is? - (folkert) - (6)
         Looks like Sybase SQL Anywhere -NT - (admin)
         Pretty close to MS SQLServer - (ChrisR) - (4)
             Why not? - (lincoln) - (3)
                 Re: Why not? - (altmann) - (2)
                     They must mean system time via the database - (lincoln) - (1)
                         TimeStamp is a non-standard type - (ChrisR)
     Left Outer Join question - (ChrisR) - (20)
         One approach - (ben_tilly) - (6)
             Some variation on MIN... - (ChrisR) - (3)
                 It probably will not optimize - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                     Yep, took forever to run. - (ChrisR) - (1)
                         Nothing non-standard about that - (drewk)
             Pre indentation - (ChrisR) - (1)
                 Bug, indentation can be lost during edits (new thread) - (ben_tilly)
         Does SQL Server support "DISTINCT ON"? - (drewk) - (12)
             That is really what I need! - (ChrisR)
             The more readable version is invalid (at least in Oracle) - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                 Hmm, both Postgres and MySQL support the same non-standard? - (drewk) - (9)
                     Can you please help me find mine? - (folkert)
                     That is a MySQL shortcut - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                         Not surprising - (drewk) - (2)
                             Or you didn't double-check enough - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                 Also possible - (drewk)
                         I've encountered that problem. - (static) - (3)
                             Justifiable arrogance in many cases - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                 Oh I have little doubt about that. - (static) - (1)
                                     Oracle is picky but... - (ben_tilly)
     deleting user-created tables via stored proc - (lincoln) - (14)
         Shouldn't be too hard - (ChrisR) - (13)
             I tried this a little while ago - (lincoln) - (12)
                 BTW, it is a dangerous script... - (ChrisR) - (11)
                     The test was successful - (lincoln) - (10)
                         Boy did that ever prove me wrong - (lincoln) - (9)
                             Should be in the Job Task history... - (ChrisR)
                             here's the latest update - (lincoln) - (7)
                                 Assuming you're on SS2k - (ChrisR) - (6)
                                     We're running SQL Server 2000 - (lincoln) - (5)
                                         Sent an email. - (ChrisR) - (4)
                                             got your email - (lincoln) - (3)
                                                 It can rather hard to peek inside a stored proc... - (ChrisR) - (2)
                                                     End result - (lincoln) - (1)
                                                         Rings a bell - (broomberg)
Now viewing page 3 of 25
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 25 [Next]

?
357 ms