After some MySQL clues.
- (static)
- (4)
- May 16, 2007, 09:14:39 PM EDT
What I'd do
- (drewk)
- (3)
- May 16, 2007, 11:07:16 PM EDT
I approached that from another direction.
- (static)
- (2)
- May 17, 2007, 12:09:44 AM EDT
Re: I approached that from another direction.
- (dws)
- (1)
- May 17, 2007, 01:41:19 AM EDT
FORCE INDEX is new to me.
- (static)
- May 17, 2007, 08:40:14 AM EDT
Backing up SQL Server 2005 to 2000
- (tangaroa)
- (5)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 05:41:33 PM EST
How much data?
- (crazy)
- (1)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 06:09:20 PM EST
Re: How much data?
- (tangaroa)
- Jan. 2, 2007, 10:47:01 PM EST
You could export it via DTS
- (ChrisR)
- (2)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 06:55:43 PM EST
I'd go with the last strategy
- (tuberculosis)
- (1)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 07:17:58 PM EST
Thanks, both of you
- (tangaroa)
- Jan. 2, 2007, 11:43:47 PM EST
So does 'DEFERRABLE' not work in postgres?
- (tuberculosis)
- (5)
- Dec. 31, 2006, 03:46:37 PM EST
Possibly not a bug:
- (admin)
- (4)
- Dec. 31, 2006, 06:45:27 PM EST
The naming convention is a bug in itself
- (tuberculosis)
- (3)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 05:15:43 PM EST
Removes the need for SET CONSTRAINTS
- (admin)
- (2)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 08:07:24 PM EST
Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -thx
- (tuberculosis)
- (1)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 09:32:57 PM EST
Re: Initially Deferred seems to be doing the right thing -th
- (admin)
- Jan. 1, 2007, 10:29:22 PM EST
PostgreSQL backup and restore strategies
- (tuberculosis)
- (5)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 04:01:52 PM EST
Re: PostgreSQL backup and restore strategies
- (Yendor)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 04:35:33 PM EST
Ditto on Mike
- (admin)
- (3)
- Dec. 22, 2006, 05:39:56 PM EST
ddl is easy
- (tuberculosis)
- (2)
- Dec. 23, 2006, 12:11:18 AM EST
Re: ddl is easy
- (Yendor)
- Dec. 23, 2006, 01:43:44 AM EST
If the issue is
- (crazy)
- Dec. 23, 2006, 11:14:21 AM EST
Need some postgresql help!
- (mmoffitt)
- (1)
- Nov. 7, 2006, 10:01:33 AM EST
Does this help?
- (Another Scott)
- Nov. 7, 2006, 11:51:47 AM EST
Temp tables in Postgresql.
- (mmoffitt)
- (3)
- Sept. 12, 2006, 02:04:10 PM EDT
Can't you specify nocache on the sproc?
-NT
- (drewk)
- (2)
- Sept. 12, 2006, 02:44:26 PM EDT
Thanks, Drew.
- (mmoffitt)
- (1)
- Sept. 18, 2006, 11:46:47 AM EDT
I thot it was s'posed to be the gigglecache on the haverproc
- (jake123)
- Sept. 18, 2006, 12:36:37 PM EDT
Man I hate OODBMS's
- (tuberculosis)
- (14)
- Sept. 9, 2006, 03:16:01 PM EDT
*snicker*
- (ubernostrum)
- (11)
- Sept. 10, 2006, 07:44:31 PM EDT
All about abstractions
- (drewk)
- (10)
- Sept. 11, 2006, 09:15:52 AM EDT
Yeah.
- (ubernostrum)
- Sept. 11, 2006, 12:02:37 PM EDT
Abstractions can be good.
- (static)
- (8)
- Sept. 11, 2006, 08:18:23 PM EDT
Uuhhh ...
- (drewk)
- (7)
- Sept. 11, 2006, 09:01:39 PM EDT
I'm not sure where your point is.
- (static)
- (6)
- Sept. 12, 2006, 01:39:24 AM EDT
Everything is not an object
- (drewk)
- (5)
- Sept. 12, 2006, 09:19:42 AM EDT
Ah.
- (static)
- (3)
- Sept. 12, 2006, 11:41:26 PM EDT
Don't take *just* my word for it
- (drewk)
- (2)
- Sept. 13, 2006, 12:08:34 AM EDT
a lttle dabble do ya, folks around here like it dabble.org
-NT
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Sept. 13, 2006, 08:07:13 PM EDT
Its not an oodbms
- (tuberculosis)
- Sept. 18, 2006, 03:21:28 AM EDT
Lists are objects
- (tuberculosis)
- Sept. 18, 2006, 03:24:34 AM EDT
Why?
- (tablizer)
- (1)
- Oct. 14, 2006, 01:44:33 AM EDT
You have it backwards - I agree with you on this
- (tuberculosis)
- Oct. 14, 2006, 08:35:23 AM EDT
way for end-users to view Oracle record locks?
- (SpiceWare)
- (5)
- July 28, 2006, 04:14:03 PM EDT
got a lead
- (SpiceWare)
- (4)
- July 28, 2006, 06:32:03 PM EDT
I can't do that
- (drewk)
- (3)
- July 30, 2006, 10:48:38 AM EDT
I seem to recall
- (broomberg)
- July 30, 2006, 11:02:32 AM EDT
It does bug me, but
- (SpiceWare)
- July 30, 2006, 10:11:50 PM EDT
It's a synonym
- (SpiceWare)
- Aug. 1, 2006, 01:21:54 PM EDT
Can anyone tell me what kind of SQL language this is?
- (folkert)
- (6)
- June 14, 2006, 04:52:28 PM EDT
Looks like Sybase SQL Anywhere
-NT
- (admin)
- June 14, 2006, 05:01:58 PM EDT
Pretty close to MS SQLServer
- (ChrisR)
- (4)
- June 14, 2006, 05:06:52 PM EDT
Why not?
- (lincoln)
- (3)
- June 16, 2006, 04:56:03 PM EDT
Re: Why not?
- (altmann)
- (2)
- June 16, 2006, 06:23:25 PM EDT
They must mean system time via the database
- (lincoln)
- (1)
- June 17, 2006, 05:46:14 PM EDT
TimeStamp is a non-standard type
- (ChrisR)
- June 17, 2006, 07:08:20 PM EDT