IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 1
active user
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Databases Forum
Now viewing page 24 of 25
[
Prev
]
1
...
20
21
22
...
25
[
Next
]
How to build this SQL statement?
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (11)
- Jan. 13, 2002, 10:27:42 PM EST
Possible answer, not tested
- (
drewk
)
- (5)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 10:31:51 AM EST
That's the real problem...
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (2)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 01:36:29 PM EST
Uh yeah?
- (
nking
)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 01:46:48 PM EST
I'll try to try it when I get home
- (
drewk
)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 03:08:35 PM EST
Looks right to me
- (
SpiceWare
)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 04:19:37 PM EST
Oughta work in Oracle, anyway, AFAIK.
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 05:39:40 PM EST
FWIW, I know you can't do that in Access
- (
tseliot
)
- (2)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 04:28:50 PM EST
Uh, how about an Access Query based on an Access query?
- (
nking
)
- (1)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 04:37:45 PM EST
That's kinda what I meant by intermediate table
- (
tseliot
)
- Jan. 16, 2002, 11:54:30 AM EST
Here's one way
- (
rickw
)
- Jan. 14, 2002, 07:36:48 PM EST
Subqueries
- (
ChrisR
)
- Jan. 15, 2002, 07:23:17 PM EST
What's different between M$ Access 97 and Access 2000?
- (
CRConrad
)
- (14)
- Dec. 20, 2001, 04:58:37 PM EST
Create this clutter...
- (
ChrisR
)
- (11)
- Dec. 20, 2001, 05:07:09 PM EST
Aha, thanks. Anything more? Anyone else? Cagle...?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (9)
- Dec. 20, 2001, 06:13:59 PM EST
The difference
- (
nking
)
- Dec. 20, 2001, 06:29:05 PM EST
Erk. Here I am.
- (
acagle
)
- (7)
- Dec. 24, 2001, 11:54:31 AM EST
Stupid Help example.
- (
acagle
)
- (6)
- Dec. 26, 2001, 01:40:38 PM EST
DAO/ADO confusion
- (
scoenye
)
- (1)
- Dec. 26, 2001, 04:22:17 PM EST
Re: DAO/ADO confusion
- (
acagle
)
- Dec. 27, 2001, 11:52:06 AM EST
Now you know why I don't like VBA. :-)
- (
static
)
- (1)
- Dec. 27, 2001, 12:45:54 AM EST
Bah!
- (
acagle
)
- Dec. 27, 2001, 01:10:27 PM EST
I've never had to set CurrentDB
- (
tseliot
)
- (1)
- Dec. 28, 2001, 01:43:05 AM EST
I always wondered about that.
- (
acagle
)
- Dec. 28, 2001, 11:41:40 AM EST
Re: Create this clutter...
- (
altmann
)
- Dec. 20, 2001, 08:13:48 PM EST
Here's a few quick differences
- (
rickw
)
- (1)
- Dec. 24, 2001, 07:19:46 PM EST
Re: form f is created and bound to v.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Jan. 3, 2002, 02:53:01 PM EST
Free and Open Source Databases for Linux and Windows
- (
nking
)
- (14)
- Dec. 13, 2001, 09:53:54 PM EST
Re: Free and Open Source Databases for Linux and Windows
- (
wharris2
)
- (7)
- Dec. 13, 2001, 10:07:09 PM EST
Postgres problems
- (
nking
)
- (2)
- Dec. 13, 2001, 10:25:37 PM EST
I got this to work
- (
static
)
- (1)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 01:39:48 AM EST
Sorry, bouncie bouncie
- (
nking
)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 01:49:36 AM EST
Exactly! ... Well, not *quite*. :-)
- (
ThinlyVeiled
)
- (3)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 07:28:32 PM EST
Groton, Conneticut
- (
tonytib
)
- (1)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 08:38:49 PM EST
Yah.. I dropped in there for breakfast
- (
Ashton
)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 09:20:48 PM EST
Now that potential Santa season is almost over...
- (
wharris2
)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 08:47:29 PM EST
You might see if Oracle is still giving out free software
- (
tonytib
)
- (5)
- Dec. 13, 2001, 10:51:47 PM EST
Oracle freebies
- (
nking
)
- (4)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 01:51:08 AM EST
Get 9i
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 10:07:58 AM EST
Yep, that's why I think he should look at Oracle/PostgreSQL
- (
tonytib
)
- (2)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 11:30:12 AM EST
This bandwidth is killing me
- (
nking
)
- (1)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 03:06:48 PM EST
Got it!
- (
nking
)
- Dec. 14, 2001, 03:12:45 PM EST
MS SQL Server 7.0 timeout settings question
- (
bbronson
)
- (4)
- Dec. 12, 2001, 07:18:47 PM EST
Function of the connection?
- (
ChrisR
)
- (3)
- Dec. 12, 2001, 09:28:24 PM EST
Re: Function of the connection?
- (
bbronson
)
- (2)
- Dec. 13, 2001, 10:06:17 AM EST
Are you wanting the Lock Timeout changed? Or...
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- Jan. 3, 2002, 02:42:05 PM EST
I want the DB server to kill the connection
- (
bbronson
)
- Jan. 6, 2002, 09:12:25 PM EST
MySQL vs Oracle question
- (
broomberg
)
- (23)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 09:37:16 AM EST
Other things to consider:
- (
admin
)
- (14)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 11:45:06 AM EST
Re: Other things to consider:
- (
broomberg
)
- (6)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 12:08:04 PM EST
Interbase "seen" as going away...
- (
admin
)
- (5)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 03:34:21 PM EST
Re: Interbase "seen" as going away...
- (
broomberg
)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 07:41:07 PM EST
PostGreSQL setup/complexity
- (
broomberg
)
- (3)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 08:18:29 PM EST
Yep.
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 08:58:00 PM EST
Re: Yep.
- (
broomberg
)
- (1)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 09:42:28 PM EST
Shouldn't need one right away.
- (
admin
)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 11:07:27 PM EST
Wierd create index behaviour
- (
broomberg
)
- (6)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 12:36:13 PM EST
index create
- (
boxley
)
- (5)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 08:04:05 PM EST
Re: index create
- (
broomberg
)
- (4)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 09:09:04 PM EST
Well, Sybase still has some money
- (
tonytib
)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 09:39:52 PM EST
Re: index create
- (
broomberg
)
- (2)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 10:27:47 PM EST
1.5 hours to create index
- (
broomberg
)
- Dec. 2, 2001, 10:53:57 PM EST
That's why I'd second the Interbase recommendation
- (
tseliot
)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 03:28:05 PM EST
Re: MySQL vs Oracle question
- (
wharris2
)
- (2)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 12:47:34 AM EST
Readonly
- (
broomberg
)
- (1)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 07:09:48 AM EST
Readonly? Hell, then, full speed ahead!
-NT
- (
wharris2
)
- Dec. 6, 2001, 07:41:13 PM EST
14 hours later, still indexing
- (
broomberg
)
- (2)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 02:08:57 PM EST
20 hours later, still indexing
- (
broomberg
)
- (1)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 08:15:59 PM EST
Wheeee - Done!!!
- (
broomberg
)
- Dec. 3, 2001, 11:03:46 PM EST
New design
- (
broomberg
)
- (1)
- Dec. 5, 2001, 08:58:34 PM EST
Happy Ending!
- (
Meerkat
)
- Dec. 6, 2001, 06:01:45 PM EST
Anybody familiar with PL/PGSQL and/or PL/SQL?
- (
drewk
)
- (8)
- Nov. 13, 2001, 01:49:08 PM EST
You very funny man...
- (
admin
)
- (6)
- Nov. 13, 2001, 01:53:09 PM EST
I was afraid of that
- (
drewk
)
- (5)
- Nov. 13, 2001, 02:00:24 PM EST
Alternative...
- (
ChrisR
)
- Nov. 13, 2001, 02:04:07 PM EST
The good news...
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- Nov. 13, 2001, 02:08:13 PM EST
Is there a chance you don't know PL/pgSQL that well, either?
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- Nov. 14, 2001, 11:04:10 AM EST
No.
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- Nov. 14, 2001, 12:44:50 PM EST
Christian's right: what are they thinking
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- Nov. 14, 2001, 01:28:05 PM EST
Sorry, I only know one of those...
- (
CRConrad
)
- Nov. 14, 2001, 06:54:26 AM EST
Need help with a Paradox problem ...
- (
jbrabeck
)
- Oct. 31, 2001, 08:57:23 AM EST
Stupid Access tricks.
- (
acagle
)
- (4)
- Oct. 26, 2001, 02:22:03 PM EDT
Please note.
- (
acagle
)
- (1)
- Oct. 26, 2001, 02:29:03 PM EDT
The default order in Access seems to be the row create date.
- (
tseliot
)
- Oct. 26, 2001, 06:03:19 PM EDT
SELECT FROM: ordering is undefined
- (
kmself
)
- (1)
- Oct. 26, 2001, 05:07:33 PM EDT
True, but....
- (
wharris2
)
- Oct. 27, 2001, 07:26:19 AM EDT
PL/SQL object functionality impressions?
- (
admin
)
- (5)
- Oct. 3, 2001, 05:14:07 PM EDT
ObHeyLookI'mJayLenoReply
-NT
- (
Yendor
)
- (1)
- Oct. 3, 2001, 05:35:50 PM EDT
ObBritWhoTheFuckIsJayLeno?Reply
-NT
- (
pwhysall
)
- Oct. 3, 2001, 05:41:10 PM EDT
Had some thoughts...
- (
ChrisR
)
- (2)
- Oct. 3, 2001, 05:38:06 PM EDT
Oracle goes part way, at least.
- (
admin
)
- Oct. 3, 2001, 08:17:26 PM EDT
In PL/SQL, a cursor's return values *can* easily be...
- (
CRConrad
)
- Oct. 3, 2001, 08:41:17 PM EDT
Archive Cut-off Technology?
- (
tablizer
)
- Sept. 21, 2001, 06:18:31 PM EDT
Now viewing page 24 of 25
[
Prev
]
1
...
20
21
22
...
25
[
Next
]
i
we
they
.org
Hey, they have color-coded detours here.
433 ms