IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 18 of 25
[Prev] 1 ... 14 15 16 ... 25 [Next]
     not to be a total whiner about mysql and firebird - (boxley) - (3)
         MySQL - (JayMehaffey)
         For a Firebird Workbench... - (altmann) - (1)
             Thanks I am downloading it - (orion)
     Is this schema screwed up, or is it just me? - (drewk) - (16)
         Your new schema looks good. - (jbrabeck) - (2)
             I guess what I'm looking for is ... - (drewk) - (1)
                 Guessing - (jbrabeck)
         Dependent Foreign Keys - (ChrisR) - (10)
             Can't happen, each county is unique - (drewk) - (9)
                 Still a function of integrity - (ChrisR) - (8)
                     Don't even need a lookup table - (drewk) - (7)
                         Maybe it's just me - (tseliot) - (6)
                             Agreed. - (admin) - (5)
                                 That's how I've already set it up - (drewk) - (4)
                                     It's not a matter of speed. - (admin) - (3)
                                         Generally I agree - (drewk) - (2)
                                             Even so. - (admin)
                                             I agree with Malraux on this one - (tablizer)
         Thoughts... - (Simon_Jester) - (1)
             You've about got it - (drewk)
     MySQL boasts it can compete with the big guys - (orion) - (3)
         SSDD - (ChrisR) - (2)
             Why that's a good idea - (drewk) - (1)
                 That's fine but that's not the current direction. - (ChrisR)
     'nother Access question. - (acagle) - (23)
         Tools->Relationships - (bepatient)
         Try this - (jbrabeck) - (17)
             Perfect! Thanks! -NT - (acagle)
             Ooh...I like that... - (bepatient) - (15)
                 Guess I aint as bad as I thought! - (jbrabeck) - (14)
                     Been a while since I used Access, but. - (mmoffitt) - (10)
                         Case statement - (orion) - (9)
                             Not that one. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                                 SQL construct - (ChrisR) - (7)
                                     Still there but only for two options -NT - (tseliot)
                                     Yeah, I was thinking Access had a TSQL-like Case statement. - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                                         IIRC the queries do support it. - (ChrisR)
                                         Yes Access has a Case statement - (jbrabeck) - (3)
                                             Yeah, I remember IIF in Access. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                 DECODE would do it, if Access has it, that is. - (Meerkat) - (1)
                                                     IIF, Case and Switch. No Decode - (jbrabeck)
                     Yes you are. - (tseliot) - (2)
                         Agree, but... - (jbrabeck) - (1)
                             Then you have one of four choices - (tseliot)
         Okay, here's another one: - (acagle) - (1)
             ="A" & Chr(13) & Chr(10) & "B" - (ChrisR)
         Does the Tab key have any special meaning to it? - (acagle) - (1)
             Check the properties - (jbrabeck)
     SAB-DB review - (broomberg) - (5)
         theres a reason they call it SAP - (boxley)
         Filesystem? - (kmself) - (1)
             Nah, CPU - (broomberg)
         What do you mean by "another Interbase"? Just wondering... -NT - (CRConrad) - (1)
             "another Interbase" - (broomberg)
     any SAP folks about? - (boxley) - (7)
         That would be Karsten. -NT - (admin) - (3)
             Thought he was SAS. -NT - (Yendor) - (2)
                 Oh, jeez. You're right. Never mind. -NT - (admin)
                 He might give you SAS but he's no SAP -NT - (boxley)
         not yet - (SpiceWare)
         I'm a sap, does that count? -NT - (mmoffitt)
         That wouldn't be a bad idea. - (bepatient)
     Access legacy database. - (acagle) - (21)
         WAG - (drewk) - (15)
             WAG == - (folkert) - (11)
                 Wild Ass Guess -NT - (drewk) - (6)
                     Ah, a SWAG! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                     I know you are but what am I??? >:~P -NT - (folkert) - (4)
                         LRPD sayeth: "Oh, Dad! We're ALL Devo!" -NT - (drewk) - (3)
                             And again: "They are the Eggmen." -NT - (drewk) - (2)
                                 I'd like to thank the Academy... -NT - (folkert) - (1)
                                     Best thing since sliced SPAM! -NT - (inthane-chan)
                 == Worthy Attempts, Greg :) -NT - (Meerkat) - (3)
                     == Wow, Absolutely GREAT! -NT - (folkert) - (2)
                         == Whee, A Game! -NT - (drewk) - (1)
                             == What A Goober! -NT - (folkert)
             WAG - (acagle) - (2)
                 Try to import the data into a new DB? -NT - (drewk) - (1)
                     (Bingo) -NT - (acagle)
         Well, never mind. - (acagle)
         Real solution - (JayMehaffey) - (3)
             Confirmed - (orion) - (2)
                 I tried that, but. . . . - (acagle) - (1)
                     Do you have the Admin password? - (orion)
     Anybody here using SQL Server? - (marlowe)
     This could go in 3 places. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
         Re: This could go in 3 places. - (gdaustin) - (3)
             Thanks. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                 Checked out Firebird? Billed as "Embedded", it's pretty... - (CRConrad) - (1)
                     Will do - thanks again. -NT - (mmoffitt)
         For embedded work... - (ben_tilly) - (1)
             Thanks, Ben. Will look into them. -NT - (mmoffitt)
     MS SQL Server: Logs & performance tuning? - (kmself) - (9)
         Two tacts... - (ChrisR) - (5)
             Probably shouldn't fight it though - (ChrisR) - (1)
                 Havnt messed with SQLServer yet, question - (boxley)
             SAS rears its ugly head... - (kmself) - (1)
                 SAS used to be able to shell out - run a "Load.Bat"? -NT - (CRConrad)
             "Tacks", actually. HTH! -NT - (CRConrad)
         Import vs. Load? BCP? - (gdaustin)
         Re: MS SQL Server: Logs & performance tuning? - (orion)
         Non-intuitively, you need to set the backup strategy. - (rickw)
Now viewing page 18 of 25
[Prev] 1 ... 14 15 16 ... 25 [Next]

Got root?
215 ms