IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 16 of 25
[Prev] 1 ... 12 13 14 ... 25 [Next]
     ODBC Connectivity from Windows command line? - (Meerkat) - (4)
         Best bet is probably a scripting engine - (ChrisR)
         If I still had the "touch" - (orion)
         Cygwin perhaps? - (static) - (1)
             'Quite Easy' is just what I need - (Meerkat)
     Objects, REFs, and Oracle collections - (admin) - (10)
         Will TREAT not work? - (ChrisR) - (7)
             Interesting... - (admin) - (6)
                 Just playing around - (ChrisR) - (3)
                     The problem with REFs: - (admin) - (2)
                         Quickly exhausting my sum total of PL/SQL knowledge :-) - (ChrisR) - (1)
                             Re: Quickly exhausting my sum total of PL/SQL knowledge :-) - (admin)
                 Some other thoughts on TREAT - (ChrisR) - (1)
                     I'll pass that on - (admin)
         can you not bang out to .dat files in the OS? - (boxley) - (1)
             In-memory, transient. - (admin)
     Oracle questions - (ChrisR) - (8)
         Re: Oracle questions - (admin) - (3)
             Tora looks pretty slick - (SpiceWare)
             Gracious - (ChrisR) - (1)
                 OO in Oracle is a pain in 9, a nightmare in 8 - (admin)
         I'm in a similar boat re: going to Oracle - (Meerkat) - (1)
             Lots of TOADs here too - (admin)
         Application perspective? - (broomberg) - (1)
             HR & Finance Applications - (ChrisR)
     Break Access database password - (orion) - (11)
         break it for free - (SpiceWare) - (10)
             Re: break it for free - (orion) - (1)
                 don't know - (SpiceWare)
             Tried it last night without success - (lincoln) - (7)
                 When you find out the password... - (ChrisR) - (2)
                     It could be this - (orion) - (1)
                         No, it couldn't - (lincoln)
                 try here first - (boxley) - (2)
                     one more link - (boxley) - (1)
                         Another no-go - (lincoln)
                 guess it was only for Access 97 -NT - (SpiceWare)
     Access checkbox values. - (acagle) - (1)
         It depends - (orion)
     MySQL syntax question - (drewk) - (9)
         ! is a Logical Not operation - (ChrisR) - (6)
             Gah, this is ugly - (drewk) - (5)
                 Best Guess - (JayMehaffey) - (4)
                     Was reusing syntax from other languages - (drewk) - (3)
                         I've found SQL tends to be explicit. - (static) - (2)
                             Yes I always thought 'INSERT INTO' sounded naughty... -NT - (Meerkat) - (1)
                                 Bad! Bad Merkat! :-) -NT - (static)
         What SQL dialect izzat? '!' for 'not' is usually C, not SQL. -NT - (CRConrad)
         pre-de-null - (tablizer)
     Database as commodity again - (FuManChu) - (3)
         Database independence not practical - (tablizer) - (2)
             COBOL-Like-SQL - (ChrisR) - (1)
                 no, it is not - (tablizer)
     Database Replication.algorithms? - (static) - (4)
         What DB you using? - (drewk) - (3)
             MySQL at the moment. - (static) - (2)
                 Might work for you - (drewk) - (1)
                     We were going to explore application level replication. - (static)
     Have an Access problem - (boxley) - (34)
         The SQL is correct. - (tseliot) - (5)
             run toy data - (tablizer)
             how would I TRIM the above statement? - (boxley) - (3)
                 Try this: - (orion) - (2)
                     your update ran OK, thanks Norm but - (boxley) - (1)
                         Access relationships - (orion)
         Could be a relationship problem - (orion) - (1)
             only relationship, single user -NT - (boxley)
         Well the documentation is misleading? :-) - (ChrisR) - (2)
             the cut and paste was correct - (boxley) - (1)
                 I've changed it in my example - (orion)
         Is "field indexed *with duplicates allowed*" on BOTH tables? - (CRConrad) - (22)
             Re: Is "field indexed *with duplicates allowed*" on BOTH tab - (orion) - (19)
                 The only primary key is on the master table - (boxley) - (2)
                     Re: The only primary key is on the master table - (orion) - (1)
                         the only link is the serial fields - (boxley)
                 That is a major assumption on your part - (tseliot) - (15)
                     Actually, for oce Norm is far more right than wrong; you... - (CRConrad) - (2)
                         We're not disagreeing here. - (tseliot) - (1)
                             Ah... *that* "assumption"! :-) - (CRConrad)
                     ALL tables need PK's. - (mmoffitt) - (11)
                         Sorry; What's an "sp"? - (tseliot) - (2)
                             Probably 'Stored Procedures'.... - (ChrisR) - (1)
                                 In Access they are "Queries" - (orion)
                         Are you disagreeing with me? I can't tell. - (tseliot) - (7)
                             Dunno if I disagree. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                 Toy and scale are not the issues. - (tseliot) - (5)
                                     Then you don't need a thirty-line table at all... - (CRConrad) - (2)
                                         Thank you. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                         Should I answer? - (FuManChu)
                                     But, but, a tool of any value has a serial number and they.. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                                         In this particular case - (FuManChu)
             Started with no index on either field - (boxley) - (1)
                 It's probably not a factor in your problem... - (tseliot)
     DB2 Cert Monster - (tablizer) - (20)
         Real Tables, meet Tablizer. Tablizer, meet Real Tables. -NT - (Arkadiy) - (7)
             ROFL -NT - (deSitter) - (6)
                 ha ha, very funny. Laff it up, furball -NT - (tablizer) - (5)
                     Re: ha ha, very funny. Laff it up, furball - (deSitter) - (4)
                         Like I said, IN PRACTICE most sites just use the defaults - (tablizer) - (3)
                             Beg to differ... - (folkert) - (2)
                                 I don't think we are communicating - (tablizer) - (1)
                                     point == missed - (folkert)
         Compare... - (folkert) - (3)
             You have to know enough about databases - (boxley)
             re: Compare... - (tablizer) - (1)
                 It was meant the way you read it. :) -NT - (folkert)
         So, anybody want to buy a slightly used DB2 cert study book? -NT - (tablizer) - (7)
             How much? -NT - (folkert) - (6)
                 $22 + shipping. Got paypal? - (tablizer) - (5)
                     do I hear $18? -NT - (tablizer) - (4)
                         $16 + Shipping - (folkert) - (3)
                             I probably would not know shipping $ ahead of time.Plan B... - (tablizer) - (2)
                                 NO NO NO NO NO NO. I won't short you, Bryce. - (folkert) - (1)
                                     People still use cheques? (new thread) - (Meerkat)
Now viewing page 16 of 25
[Prev] 1 ... 12 13 14 ... 25 [Next]

A base libel on toxic waste dumps everywhere.
451 ms