IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Databases Forum
Now viewing page 11 of 25
[
Prev
]
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
[
Next
]
Anyone point to a good howto for postgres installation?
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- May 1, 2004, 08:29:33 PM EDT
Take a look on Knight and Lord.
- (
folkert
)
- (1)
- May 1, 2004, 10:11:41 PM EDT
Got it somewhat figured out
- (
drewk
)
- May 1, 2004, 10:21:48 PM EDT
Is there any DB without a current_date function?
- (
FuManChu
)
- (9)
- April 30, 2004, 02:39:23 PM EDT
Firebird has CURRENT_DATE, CURRENT_TIME, & CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (5)
- May 4, 2004, 02:45:46 AM EDT
Also: CURRENT_SHILL, CURRENT_CRC, CURRENT_CRCERROR
-NT
- (
folkert
)
- (4)
- May 4, 2004, 01:29:58 PM EDT
Ob:Eiks taeae vittun homma nyt riitaeae taestae paeivaestae?
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- (3)
- May 5, 2004, 02:45:56 AM EDT
Nah, didn't mean to accuse you of anything...
- (
folkert
)
- (2)
- May 5, 2004, 10:18:56 PM EDT
Likewise. (I don't believe in Babelfishing Finnish, BTW. :-)
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- May 5, 2004, 05:31:33 PM EDT
Believe even less in Merkins getting Finnish without it! :-)
-NT
- (
CRConrad
)
- May 6, 2004, 07:12:45 AM EDT
Resource Link
- (
ChrisR
)
- (2)
- May 8, 2004, 09:57:11 PM EDT
very useful, thanx
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- May 8, 2004, 10:12:30 PM EDT
Excellent! Vielen dank
-NT
- (
FuManChu
)
- May 9, 2004, 10:40:49 AM EDT
Beware Access 2003.
- (
acagle
)
- (8)
- April 23, 2004, 01:48:19 PM EDT
Access 2002 does that too.
- (
altmann
)
- April 23, 2004, 03:10:55 PM EDT
Unique constraint is to blame.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 23, 2004, 09:51:43 PM EDT
Correct. Tables and queries share the same namespace.
- (
rickw
)
- (3)
- April 26, 2004, 12:07:28 PM EDT
Re: Correct. Tables and queries share the same namespace.
- (
acagle
)
- (2)
- April 26, 2004, 01:07:56 PM EDT
Yeah...me too...
- (
rickw
)
- (1)
- May 5, 2004, 01:55:48 PM EDT
ICLRPD (new thread)
- (
Another Scott
)
- May 5, 2004, 01:59:55 PM EDT
Access Weird Behavior #233.
- (
acagle
)
- (1)
- April 28, 2004, 12:29:59 PM EDT
Note: It's a bug.
- (
acagle
)
- April 28, 2004, 12:42:11 PM EDT
How do I pass parameters to a Query in Access
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (12)
- April 19, 2004, 01:11:31 PM EDT
Re: How do I pass parameters to a Query in Access
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- April 19, 2004, 01:40:00 PM EDT
For *very* simple stuff
- (
FuManChu
)
- (7)
- April 19, 2004, 02:06:16 PM EDT
Here's the SQL code.
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (4)
- April 19, 2004, 03:20:01 PM EDT
Reformatting a bit
- (
ChrisR
)
- April 19, 2004, 03:53:17 PM EDT
Are all of those date parts from a single date?
- (
FuManChu
)
- (2)
- April 19, 2004, 04:40:43 PM EDT
More
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (1)
- April 19, 2004, 04:55:09 PM EDT
Sorry
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- April 19, 2004, 05:19:22 PM EDT
Re: For *very* simple stuff
- (
andread
)
- (1)
- April 19, 2004, 03:21:26 PM EDT
Or "query by form"
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 19, 2004, 04:38:56 PM EDT
Found a way
- (
jbrabeck
)
- April 20, 2004, 02:24:10 PM EDT
Different approach is DoCmd.RunSQL
- (
rickw
)
- (1)
- April 26, 2004, 12:48:43 PM EDT
How I've got it running
- (
jbrabeck
)
- April 26, 2004, 02:46:40 PM EDT
Slow query needs optimizing
- (
tangaroa
)
- (19)
- April 16, 2004, 02:52:55 AM EDT
Re: Slow query needs optimizing
- (
pwhysall
)
- (3)
- April 16, 2004, 07:02:04 AM EDT
Just imagine a Beowolf cluster of those.
-NT
- (
ChrisR
)
- (2)
- April 16, 2004, 11:33:33 AM EDT
Great, now we're turning into /.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- April 16, 2004, 11:36:50 AM EDT
Running DOSiX!
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- April 16, 2004, 11:50:39 AM EDT
Can you post
- (
jbrabeck
)
- (6)
- April 16, 2004, 09:55:24 AM EDT
'fraid not
- (
tangaroa
)
- (5)
- April 16, 2004, 06:11:09 PM EDT
pump to file, cat file |sort -k3 >outputfile
- (
boxley
)
- April 16, 2004, 10:48:21 PM EDT
If you're allowed correlated subquery, then:
- (
morganek
)
- (1)
- April 16, 2004, 11:43:11 PM EDT
Re: If you're allowed correlated subquery, then:
- (
tangaroa
)
- April 17, 2004, 12:12:09 AM EDT
Re: 'fraid not
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- April 17, 2004, 01:43:40 AM EDT
Is "SQL Sever" intentional? (Regardless, I like it. :-)
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- April 17, 2004, 01:49:40 AM EDT
I don't recognize the "within" clause
- (
ben_tilly
)
- April 16, 2004, 01:47:40 PM EDT
Not quite sure what you are doing
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (6)
- April 16, 2004, 03:49:51 PM EDT
Whew, glad it's not just me that didn't understand.
-NT
- (
jbrabeck
)
- April 16, 2004, 04:02:30 PM EDT
Pet peeve on SQLServer
- (
ChrisR
)
- (4)
- April 16, 2004, 04:38:14 PM EDT
Rarely use real temporary tables
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (3)
- April 16, 2004, 05:27:44 PM EDT
I just finished writing about 15 stored procedures.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- April 16, 2004, 08:09:35 PM EDT
Table variables are great
- (
ChrisR
)
- (1)
- April 16, 2004, 08:37:19 PM EDT
Thanks.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- April 18, 2004, 12:26:23 PM EDT
Concentration to fewer IT players marches relentlessly on...
- (
CRConrad
)
- April 7, 2004, 09:56:02 AM EDT
Oracle: 'DECODE' performance impact?
- (
Meerkat
)
- (19)
- April 6, 2004, 09:47:12 PM EDT
Highly unlikely
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (4)
- April 6, 2004, 10:14:19 PM EDT
Sounds like a great book
- (
Meerkat
)
- (3)
- April 6, 2004, 10:28:33 PM EDT
Re: Sounds like a great book
- (
kelzer
)
- (2)
- April 7, 2004, 06:11:50 PM EDT
Heh. We've got a comedian among us.
- (
Another Scott
)
- April 7, 2004, 06:16:56 PM EDT
My subconscious inadvertantly told you all
- (
Meerkat
)
- April 7, 2004, 11:59:02 PM EDT
Depends on what clause
- (
ChrisR
)
- (3)
- April 6, 2004, 10:52:32 PM EDT
Just to clarify that
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (2)
- April 7, 2004, 01:14:51 AM EDT
It's just in the SELECT clause
- (
Meerkat
)
- (1)
- April 7, 2004, 02:02:20 AM EDT
Functions in the WHERE can be fine
- (
ben_tilly
)
- April 7, 2004, 10:57:43 AM EDT
Belated answer: "What they said".
- (
CRConrad
)
- (8)
- April 7, 2004, 09:50:49 AM EDT
Transposing rows to columns is a PITA
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (7)
- April 7, 2004, 10:50:12 AM EDT
"When the only tool you have is a hammer..."
- (
CRConrad
)
- (6)
- April 8, 2004, 01:52:00 AM EDT
But that isn't the only tool that I have
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (5)
- April 8, 2004, 02:23:07 AM EDT
At least Perl is a good hammer to have
- (
Meerkat
)
- (3)
- April 8, 2004, 03:02:39 AM EDT
use that one a lot
- (
Steve Lowe
)
- (2)
- April 8, 2004, 03:12:58 AM EDT
I don't like it
- (
broomberg
)
- (1)
- April 22, 2004, 10:58:47 PM EDT
No feedback? That's what top / glance is for :)
-NT
- (
Meerkat
)
- April 23, 2004, 02:23:05 AM EDT
No no no, you misunderstand!
- (
CRConrad
)
- April 8, 2004, 03:11:51 AM EDT
Eliminate decode wherever you can
- (
tuberculosis
)
- April 9, 2004, 03:01:43 AM EDT
Could you do multi-master replication for < $1-million?
- (
drewk
)
- (11)
- March 29, 2004, 11:35:18 AM EST
Sure, T3's :-)
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- March 29, 2004, 11:55:31 AM EST
/me smacks forehead
- (
drewk
)
- March 29, 2004, 12:17:47 PM EST
Well from a support guy point of view
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- March 29, 2004, 12:29:08 PM EST
That's one of the things we're considering
- (
drewk
)
- (1)
- March 29, 2004, 01:02:26 PM EST
well with the thin clients pointing to an webserver at the
- (
boxley
)
- March 29, 2004, 01:16:28 PM EST
Does this answer your question about PG?
- (
folkert
)
- (5)
- March 29, 2004, 02:18:23 PM EST
Much cool
- (
drewk
)
- (4)
- March 29, 2004, 02:21:06 PM EST
Willingness to spend some of that <$1million might help :-P
-NT
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- March 29, 2004, 02:27:53 PM EST
We are ... ___________________________________ No, seriously
- (
drewk
)
- March 29, 2004, 02:33:49 PM EST
Goto:
- (
folkert
)
- (1)
- March 29, 2004, 03:47:03 PM EST
Will do, thanks for the pointers
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- March 29, 2004, 05:12:13 PM EST
Need a multi-master replication solution
- (
drewk
)
- March 25, 2004, 04:04:56 PM EST
Postgres users: functions
- (
admin
)
- (5)
- March 23, 2004, 09:36:23 AM EST
Thanks.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- March 23, 2004, 09:40:46 AM EST
Oracle is similar
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (3)
- March 23, 2004, 11:11:54 AM EST
OT - recommend a Perl refresher project for tomorrow?
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- March 23, 2004, 11:28:13 AM EST
You'll be dealing with Informix?
- (
ben_tilly
)
- (1)
- March 23, 2004, 11:34:47 AM EST
Thanks, excellent advice
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- March 23, 2004, 11:36:29 AM EST
Now viewing page 11 of 25
[
Prev
]
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
[
Next
]
i
we
they
.org
This is your brain on bad interior design. Any questions?
640 ms