IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 5 of 11
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Next]
     More good points - (imric) - (66)
         Re: More good points - (ubernostrum) - (63)
             Technical mistake - (ben_tilly) - (61)
                 I'm not so sure - (ubernostrum) - (60)
                     Nope. Talk to a lawyer. - (ben_tilly) - (59)
                         That's the thing - (ubernostrum) - (58)
                             You've missed the point, let me simplify - (ben_tilly) - (57)
                                 How do modifications/contributions work, then? - (ubernostrum) - (56)
                                     Any lawyer will tell you that that is a non-issue - (ben_tilly) - (55)
                                         Doesn't change anything - (ubernostrum) - (54)
                                             I suggest that you talk to a lawyer if you're concerned - (ben_tilly) - (53)
                                                 OK, bad wording. - (ubernostrum) - (52)
                                                     Again, you're not a lawyer. Don't try to play one. - (ben_tilly) - (51)
                                                         A question - (ubernostrum) - (50)
                                                             Answer - (ben_tilly) - (49)
                                                                 But it does - (ubernostrum) - (48)
                                                                     I granted one point, not the other - (ben_tilly) - (47)
                                                                         Let's try it again, then - (ubernostrum) - (44)
                                                                             Ahh, now I get you - (drewk) - (4)
                                                                                 Not quite - (ubernostrum) - (3)
                                                                                     I'm trying to figure out why you don't "get" this - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                                                         Modifications are only made under the terms of one license - (ubernostrum) - (1)
                                                                                             Where does the GPL v2 say that? - (ben_tilly)
                                                                             Step 4 is wrong. - (ben_tilly) - (38)
                                                                                 Re: Step 4 is wrong. - (ubernostrum) - (37)
                                                                                     Re: Step 4 is wrong. - (altmann) - (11)
                                                                                         Half-right - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                                                                                             Not so sure. - (altmann) - (9)
                                                                                                 Hrm... - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                                                                                     You can mix it, but wouldn't it all become v2 only? - (drewk) - (3)
                                                                                                         Yabut.. - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                                                                             Depends on which came first - (drewk) - (1)
                                                                                                                 Read atcroft's question again - (ben_tilly)
                                                                                                 Well, my instincts don't seem bad... - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                                                                                     Wait a minute. - (ubernostrum) - (2)
                                                                                                         Not quite. - (altmann) - (1)
                                                                                                             You got it -NT - (ben_tilly)
                                                                                     Step 7 in your logic is wrong - (ben_tilly) - (24)
                                                                                         Re: Step 7 in your logic is wrong - (ubernostrum) - (23)
                                                                                             You are not doing that though! - (ben_tilly) - (22)
                                                                                                 Re: You are not doing that though! - (ubernostrum) - (21)
                                                                                                     BUT YOU'RE NOT IMPOSING!!! - (ben_tilly) - (19)
                                                                                                         BUT FREEDOM MUST BE FREE! - (ubernostrum) - (18)
                                                                                                             Are you actively trying to be stupid? - (ben_tilly) - (17)
                                                                                                                 This is entertaining; but weirdly hypothetical, isn't it? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                                                     Here's some clarifications on your take. - (ben_tilly)
                                                                                                                 Your mother was a hamster - (ubernostrum) - (8)
                                                                                                                     Interesting - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                                                                                                                         Ben, you ignorant slut - (ubernostrum) - (6)
                                                                                                                             Your intended point was not what you accomplished - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                                                                                                                                 Riddle me this - (ubernostrum) - (4)
                                                                                                                                     The riddle is trivial - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                                                                                                                         Ah, Ben, you didn't meditate. - (ubernostrum) - (2)
                                                                                                                                             I don't know of anywhere that this has been asked - (ben_tilly)
                                                                                                                                             Future versions don't have to remain compatible - (drewk)
                                                                                                                 And your father smelt of elderberries - (ubernostrum) - (3)
                                                                                                                     And you have the brains of a chihuahua - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                                                                                         See, here's the thing - (ubernostrum) - (1)
                                                                                                                             That is a misunderstanding I hadn't quite anticipated - (ben_tilly)
                                                                                                                 Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time - (ubernostrum) - (1)
                                                                                                                     What do the other definitions say? - (ben_tilly)
                                                                                                     What does this mean? - (drewk)
                                                                         Re: I granted one point, not the other - (bepatient) - (1)
                                                                             No, we really are arguing different points - (ben_tilly)
             Well, the actual draft isn't available yet. - (imric)
         I don't really have a dog in this fight - (hnick) - (1)
             Actually they started as extremists -NT - (ben_tilly)
     GPL, Version 3 - (pwhysall) - (19)
         Yeah, I should have branched this far earlier... - (imric) - (9)
             In what way - (JayMehaffey) - (8)
                 Employment. - (imric) - (7)
                     We shall see - (JayMehaffey) - (6)
                         GAH. - (imric) - (5)
                             Re: GAH. - (JayMehaffey)
                             Try this - (drewk) - (3)
                                 No, Drew. YOU did. - (imric) - (2)
                                     Yeah, I was agreeing with you - (drewk) - (1)
                                         *chuckle* Sorry. Paranoia at work. -NT - (imric)
         Re: GPL, Version 3 - (cwbrenn) - (8)
             That is interesting - (SpiceWare) - (7)
                 Maybe. - (cwbrenn) - (6)
                     I found it! - (cwbrenn) - (5)
                         *chuckle* -NT - (imric)
                         But note that... - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                             On the other hand... - (cwbrenn)
                             You change tactics, not philosophy - (drewk) - (1)
                                 Point -NT - (ben_tilly)
     Why people prefer open source software - (ben_tilly)
     Price FIxing? - (bepatient) - (5)
         Yeah - she's a piece of work, isn't she. -NT - (imric) - (4)
             Did you see Rorgg's comment? - (Another Scott) - (3)
                 Well she'll shortly have a smaller public platform :-) -NT - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                     'Til Microsoft hire her :) -NT - (Meerkat)
                 These things will be removed shortly from Sys-Con. - (folkert)
     Hints about the GPL v3 - (ben_tilly) - (15)
         Wouldn't that also apply to non-OSS licenses? - (drewk) - (4)
             Yes - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                 Sounds like the real choice in licensing is simplicity - (drewk) - (2)
                     BSD is simpler - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                         Hate to say this, but ... - (drewk)
         That would conflict with Freedom 0. - (ubernostrum) - (9)
             Why wouldn't he? - (ben_tilly) - (8)
                 I can think of one reason - (jake123) - (7)
                     That argument is not new - (ben_tilly)
                     RMS is far crazier than that. - (broomberg) - (2)
                         He was probably right - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                             (Un)intended consequences - (drewk)
                     That could bring up an interesting possibility. - (static) - (2)
                         That entirely depends on what your website does - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                             I hadn't thought of that. -NT - (static)
     Brazil and Free Software - (ben_tilly) - (1)
         Very nice. Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt)
     FUD FUD FUD FUD - (drewk) - (19)
         The first bit is right. - (admin) - (17)
             Really? - (drewk) - (15)
                 Shouldn't matter. - (admin) - (1)
                     If you _give_ the contractor the code, maybe. - (imric)
                 The right definition of distribute is set by copyright law - (ben_tilly) - (12)
                     Yes it would - (jake123) - (11)
                         Doesn't GPL prohibit additional terms? - (drewk) - (8)
                             This is a FAQ. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                 Note that this disagrees with Jake's understanding above. -NT - (ben_tilly)
                                 That contradicts what Jake said - (drewk) - (5)
                                     Various corrections - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                                         So do you agree with Scott's assessment? - (drewk) - (3)
                                             Yes. Mostly. - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                                 In that case, you're being compelled - (drewk) - (1)
                                                     That's the idea - but how far does that go? - (ben_tilly)
                         You didn't do your research very well? - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                             Okay, so we use the Copyright definition of distribute - (drewk)
             what about an IP statement that all contractors sign - (boxley)
         I think it's half right - (Arkadiy)
     What the Fashion industry has to say about copyright - (ben_tilly)
     EULA insanity in mainstream media - (pwhysall) - (3)
         Whaddaya mean "mainstream"? It's not even in the .com domain -NT - (drewk)
         IrLRPD (new thread) - (SpiceWare)
         Getting to 'general electronics' anyway - (Ashton)
     World's greatest EULA - (drewk) - (7)
         What is the evidence of their sense of humor? - (ben_tilly) - (6)
             then you have never used a used condom I take it - (boxley) - (5)
                 Um, no. I haven't. -NT - (ben_tilly) - (4)
                     Well, that was obvious. - (inthane-chan) - (3)
                         Don't you mean.. - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                             Hey! - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                 Return fire is also legal. :-P -NT - (ben_tilly)
Now viewing page 5 of 11
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Next]

Powered by the Great Sphincter on the Mall!
449 ms