IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 2 of 11
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Next]
     PJ on Moto vs MS in WA/Germany. - (Another Scott)
     Is this for real? - (crazy) - (1)
         Neat. It's an Application - dunno if it has a chance. - (Another Scott)
     Walking through some logic - (ubernostrum) - (3)
         No... MUST - (folkert) - (2)
             For extra hilarity... - (ubernostrum) - (1)
                 Its a "taste great" "less filling" alternative... - (folkert)
     Patent change law - (admin) - (2)
         Nothing to do with prior art - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
             Ah, ok. - (admin)
     House committee passes patent law changes. - (a6l6e6x)
     If MS indemnifies one, it indemnifies all. - (Another Scott) - (13)
         No one has mentioned how it is unlikely the kernel will go - (crazy) - (1)
             He's softened his views on later drafts. It's possible now. - (Another Scott)
         Re: If MS indemnifies one, it indemnifies all. - (andread) - (10)
             The developers have to agree to the new license. - (admin) - (1)
                 "Supersedes" </CRC> -NT - (pwhysall)
             You can't downgrade a license. - (Andrew Grygus) - (7)
                 But didn't MS become MS due to its lawyers? - (Another Scott)
                 Have I Got It Right? - (andread) - (2)
                     A copy of old code in your posession . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         Thanks -NT - (andread)
                 Eh? - (pwhysall) - (2)
                     Double Eh? - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         Re: Double Eh? - (pwhysall)
     Groklaw on GPLv3 Section 11 - Patents. - (Another Scott) - (1)
         Skip, have you read the new draft? - (folkert)
     Well, there they go again - (drewk) - (9)
         How is that FUD? - (admin) - (8)
             Because it doesn't matter where the code came from - (JayMehaffey) - (7)
                 They're not talking about copying closed source - (admin) - (6)
                     How is it worse/different from closed source? - (drewk) - (3)
                         Because people are far less likely to see closed source. - (crazy) - (2)
                             Really? - (ubernostrum) - (1)
                                 Purposeful denseness - (crazy)
                     It's not false per se - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                         Yes, it's bad product placement - (drewk)
     Mary Jo talks to Jeremy about the Novell deal, etc. - (Another Scott) - (1)
         The commenting software on that blog sucks even worse - (jake123)
     Sun released Java under GPL on November 13, 2006 - (Another Scott) - (2)
         Finally -NT - (JayMehaffey)
         Re: Sun released Java under GPL on November 13, 2006 - (Yendor)
Now viewing page 2 of 11
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [Next]

So anyway...
145 ms