IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 89 of 92
[Prev] 1 ... 85 86 87 ... 92 [Next]
     Anybody want to do a Java code review? - (inthane-chan) - (13)
         Of the top of my head.... - (ChrisR)
         Re: Anybody want to do a Java code review? - (bluke) - (1)
             This is exactly why I need the review. - (inthane-chan)
         Couple comments - (tuberculosis) - (8)
             Thanks - (inthane-chan) - (6)
                 questions - (tablizer) - (5)
                     Purchase Order ID is specified by the purchaser, i.e... - (a6l6e6x) - (4)
                         That is an external ID - (tablizer) - (3)
                             Yep. You got it. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
                                 Then why not simply keep it an attrib instd of object? -NT - (tablizer) - (1)
                                     Excellent place for code reuse. - (inthane-chan)
             Good comments - (admin)
         Re: Anybody want to do a Java code review? - (bri)
     Variable names in Python - (tjsinclair) - (4)
         Not Python specific... - (ChrisR) - (3)
             I was thinking about that but not sure how to implement -NT - (tjsinclair) - (2)
                 Re: I was thinking about that but not sure how to implement - (admin) - (1)
                     Thanks! -NT - (tjsinclair)
     MS shill spreading FUD on Kuro5hin - (marlowe) - (33)
         K5 has gotten too popular. - (static) - (15)
             And one that many Usenet groups went down before that - (ben_tilly) - (10)
                 Yes, I was also thinking something along those lines. -NT - (static)
                 Have to admit - (kmself) - (7)
                     True enough. - (static)
                     An admission of my own - (ben_tilly) - (5)
                         No hard feelings - (rusty) - (4)
                             Decisions, decisions - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                                 Are you on the high side of the chasm? - (wharris2) - (2)
                                     A more readable version - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                         Much better -NT - (wharris2)
                 Leading to an unpleasant dilemna. - (marlowe)
             Nah. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                 Yah. You're right. - (static) - (2)
                     The ultimate test is to see how they - (tablizer) - (1)
                         Okay, then. I'll be watching. -NT - (static)
         Gee, that's not a conclusion you just jumped to, is it? - (kmself) - (14)
             Conclusions jumped to long ago... - (rusty) - (9)
                 Hey, glad to see ya :) - (pwhysall) - (3)
                     Re: Hey, glad to see ya :) - (rusty) - (2)
                         Re: Hey, glad to see ya :) - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             Don't forget INTERCAL - (admin)
                 Smells like ad hominem. - (marlowe) - (4)
                     Speaking of sniping at the messenger... - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                         An Ad Hominem for an Ad Hominem - (rusty)
                     I love archaeology. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                         Ah.. fossils. - (Ashton)
             No, that's an observation of an overall pattern. - (marlowe) - (2)
                 Reading this... - (pwhysall)
                 Where to begin - (kmself)
             Nope kinda like bens answer, went and wasnt amused/enthused -NT - (boxley)
         I read the article in question, I am not a MS$ fan - (boxley) - (1)
             Missing the forest for the trees. - (marlowe)
     Anyone got a good crash primer on OO terminology? - (drewk) - (11)
         Re: Anyone got a good crash primer on OO terminology? - (pwhysall) - (2)
             Oh hush -NT - (drewk)
             You stole my sig! -NT - (tablizer)
         A Couple - (ChrisR) - (7)
             Is this one worth going through? - (drewk) - (6)
                 Geared towards Scheme... - (ChrisR) - (1)
                     Did seem pretty disconnected from *my* "real world" - (drewk)
                 I'll be going through it for sure. - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                     I was wrong. - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                         SICP - (ChrisR)
                         If you want Common Lisp... - (ben_tilly)
     For all of those who laughed at me and my "shapes" examples. - (admin) - (5)
         Whatchamean "all"? Just one, AFAIK... YM "all of" Bryce? :-) -NT - (CRConrad)
         I laughed. - (pwhysall)
         as a test, or an actual need? -NT - (tablizer) - (2)
             Actual need. -NT - (admin) - (1)
                 Care to give any details? Or is it a trade secret? -NT - (tablizer)
     Inheritance versus Interfaces... - (inthane-chan) - (22)
         Well, being an Object Pascal user and fan... - (CRConrad) - (1)
             I could be wrong. - (inthane-chan)
         Re: Inheritance versus Interfaces... - (admin) - (6)
             Thane, read Gamma et al. "Design Patterns" NOW... - (tseliot) - (3)
                 Personally, I have (and prefer) the CD version of the GoF - (admin)
                 Right - (deSitter) - (1)
                     Er, what? -NT - (admin)
             Somewhat Glossed Over - (deSitter) - (1)
                 Don't pontificate - (admin)
         "no flame-wars"? .....party pOOper -NT - (tablizer)
         More mechanisms exist - (tuberculosis) - (7)
             Go for the XSL as a topic for sure. - (admin) - (6)
                 The problem right now... - (inthane-chan)
                 I'd love to hear them - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                     Couple of quickies: - (admin) - (2)
                         eXtensible Mangling Language - (static)
                         Heh - (deSitter)
                 That's how VB defines things... - (inthane-chan)
         Re: Inheritance versus Interfaces... - (JimWeirich) - (3)
             Re: Inheritance versus Interfaces... - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                 That's the basic of it. - (inthane-chan)
                 Re: Inheritance versus Interfaces... - (kelzer)
     Fun with factorials... - (ChrisR) - (2)
         Whew! Some scary stuff there! :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
         This Brings Up An Important Point - (deSitter)
     XSL question - (admin) - (8)
         Answering my own question: (or maybe not) - (admin) - (3)
             < and > ... ? -NT - (CRConrad) - (2)
                 That's what I'm doing. - (admin) - (1)
                     I meant, in your input - but I guess... - (CRConrad)
         OK, *really* answering my own question: - (admin) - (1)
             OK, guyze: Nobody *ever* call Pascal "verbose" again! :-) -NT - (CRConrad)
         My take on XSL - (tuberculosis) - (1)
             Same here, after working through some demos - (admin)
     XML: Attributes vs. elements - (admin) - (17)
         Re: XML: Attributes vs. elements - (neelk) - (1)
             Keeping tools in mind... - (admin)
         One thought... - (ChrisR) - (8)
             Something else I noticed... - (admin) - (7)
                 Attributes implies (to me) an inherent property - (drewk) - (6)
                     Re: Attributes implies (to me) an inherent property - (admin) - (3)
                         Sodium. Glad to help. :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                         Attribute - (cforde) - (1)
                             I'll agree with Carl here - (drewk)
                     Implies to Me - Design Idiocy - (deSitter) - (1)
                         Once again, don't pontificate... - (admin)
         Prefer elements over attributes - (dpeterson) - (2)
             OK, so starting to form a distinction here... - (admin) - (1)
                 Yeah, back to what he said again - (drewk)
         My rule of thumb - (tuberculosis) - (2)
             Ah, nicely succinct. Thanks. -NT - (admin)
             Snort - (deSitter)
     Any other DotNet Developers out there? - (orion) - (7)
         Version 1.0 is gonna be so fricken buggy - (tablizer) - (1)
             web services? - (tablizer)
         Can't read that page - (wharris2) - (3)
             Blue on green (Yeah, that sux too!), in my Moz (Win32) 0.9.4 -NT - (CRConrad) - (2)
                 Shades of my old Commodore 64 - (orion) - (1)
                     www.visibone.com - (static)
         More easily read from my Win98 at home - (wharris2)
Now viewing page 89 of 92
[Prev] 1 ... 85 86 87 ... 92 [Next]

It me, your father.
1,955 ms