(new) Theory and Practice of Programming

IDEA 4 - (tuberculosis) - (2) - March 9, 2004, 12:53:49 PM EST

Got a link handy? - (ChrisR) - (1) - March 9, 2004, 12:58:28 PM EST

Re: Got a link handy? - (bluke) - March 9, 2004, 02:11:08 PM EST

I18N (internationalization) and exceptions - (bluke) - (3) - March 9, 2004, 08:14:49 AM EST

Use exception's class name as a key? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (2) - March 9, 2004, 08:36:55 AM EST

That would lead to a lot of exception classes - (bluke) - (1) - March 9, 2004, 09:31:14 AM EST

Create a wrapper exception class - (tuberculosis) - March 9, 2004, 10:22:57 AM EST

How the hell did this one become a programmer? - (Arkadiy) - (16) - March 4, 2004, 11:26:43 AM EST

Suspenders and a belt, I guess... :-P - (admin) - (1) - March 4, 2004, 01:33:45 PM EST

nails, screws and super glue, too. -NT - (Arkadiy) - March 4, 2004, 02:32:40 PM EST

Re: How the hell did this one become a programmer? - (deSitter) - March 4, 2004, 01:44:07 PM EST

Maybe the inside section used to be longer - (tablizer) - (1) - March 4, 2004, 01:47:30 PM EST

Only if - (jb4) - March 8, 2004, 02:23:37 PM EST

True confessions. - (Another Scott) - March 4, 2004, 02:22:59 PM EST

Simple, he is paid based on lines of code written... - (a6l6e6x) - March 4, 2004, 09:15:56 PM EST

That is the way they teach them in college these days - (orion) - (6) - March 4, 2004, 10:23:06 PM EST

Durty, yes. Quick? What's quick about it? -NT - (Arkadiy) - (5) - March 5, 2004, 09:14:12 AM EST

Quick as in the time it takes to write it, - (orion) - (4) - March 5, 2004, 04:52:48 PM EST

He WROTE THE SAME TEST TWICE! Izzat "quick" in your opinion? -NT - (CRConrad) - (3) - March 5, 2004, 06:24:28 PM EST

Yes quick and redunant - (orion) - (2) - March 5, 2004, 07:44:55 PM EST

"Quick and dirty" would have been, writing NO tests at all. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 6, 2004, 05:05:03 PM EST

I disagree - (orion) - March 7, 2004, 11:25:28 PM EST

When all you have is 3Ghz... - (jb4) - (1) - March 8, 2004, 02:22:51 PM EST

Forget the efficiency, my BRAIN hurts! -NT - (Arkadiy) - March 8, 2004, 04:22:52 PM EST

Are EJBs really this painful? - (ben_tilly) - (15) - March 3, 2004, 01:30:34 AM EST

AdminiScott's dislike of them seems rather reasonable. -NT - (CRConrad) - March 3, 2004, 02:12:06 AM EST

Yes ... - (bluke) - (5) - March 3, 2004, 03:03:54 AM EST

IDE Generating boilerplate - (tuberculosis) - (4) - March 3, 2004, 10:33:40 AM EST

Can someone give a good explanation of Home, Remote, etc? - (bluke) - (3) - March 3, 2004, 10:56:50 AM EST

It *doesn't* need them. - (admin) - (1) - March 3, 2004, 11:07:32 AM EST

I think EJB's came from IBM -NT - (bluke) - March 3, 2004, 12:17:34 PM EST

Theoretical distributability - (tuberculosis) - March 3, 2004, 12:01:51 PM EST

Yes. -NT - (admin) - March 3, 2004, 08:47:29 AM EST

It's worse - (ChrisR) - March 3, 2004, 01:11:00 PM EST

They purposely F'd it up to make OO look bad -NT - (tablizer) - (4) - March 3, 2004, 05:27:54 PM EST

Actually EJB's have little to do with OO - (bluke) - (3) - March 4, 2004, 02:49:04 AM EST

So bad that no paradigm wants to claim it? - (tablizer) - (2) - March 4, 2004, 01:58:51 PM EST

Huh? Are you making up stuff as you go along, again? - (CRConrad) - (1) - March 4, 2004, 04:29:00 PM EST

Old school usenet style. -NT - (jake123) - March 5, 2004, 01:37:31 AM EST

OK, I get it! - (jb4) - March 4, 2004, 10:41:09 AM EST

Here's the apache/jboss/tomcat config stuff - (tuberculosis) - (6) - Feb. 26, 2004, 08:35:43 PM EST

address="0.0.0.0" ? -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2004, 08:44:31 PM EST

Oops! Changed that - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 26, 2004, 09:31:54 PM EST

I give up - (tuberculosis) - (3) - March 6, 2004, 04:37:46 PM EST

Care to give a more detailed post-mortem? - (deSitter) - (1) - March 6, 2004, 05:09:28 PM EST

OK - (tuberculosis) - March 6, 2004, 08:58:19 PM EST

Yeah, I just replaced my last Tomcat app - (FuManChu) - March 6, 2004, 05:43:40 PM EST

Anybody integrated apache w/jboss/embedded tomcat via mod_jk - (tuberculosis) - (7) - Feb. 26, 2004, 10:26:48 AM EST

A moderate number of moons ago. - (admin) - (6) - Feb. 26, 2004, 10:44:27 AM EST

OT: tomcat question. - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Feb. 26, 2004, 12:05:54 PM EST

What platform? - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 26, 2004, 01:36:05 PM EST

No JNI. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2004, 03:15:23 PM EST

Re: No JNI. - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2004, 03:21:38 PM EST

We did. Same problems. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 26, 2004, 03:24:22 PM EST

are you using a mixed c and gcc environment? -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 26, 2004, 01:54:43 PM EST

Exception Handling Policy - (JimWeirich) - (48) - Feb. 26, 2004, 12:20:25 AM EST

Possibly it depends on what level of code you are writing... - (Simon_Jester) - (38) - Feb. 26, 2004, 08:20:05 AM EST

Ditto. - (admin) - (37) - Feb. 26, 2004, 09:24:37 AM EST

Because checked exceptions are STOOPID! - (tuberculosis) - (35) - Feb. 26, 2004, 10:23:11 AM EST

One reason I like Spring Framework - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2004, 10:43:49 AM EST

Absolutely - (bluke) - Feb. 26, 2004, 03:55:45 PM EST

Re: Because checked exceptions are STOOPID! - (dshellman) - (23) - Feb. 27, 2004, 04:20:44 PM EST

One respectable reason - (admin) - (13) - Feb. 27, 2004, 04:36:46 PM EST

Re: One respectable reason - (dshellman) - (12) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:09:53 PM EST

The problem with Java model is that I cannot - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:30:34 PM EST

Re: The problem with Java model is that I cannot - (dshellman) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:37:26 PM EST

But that would (i.e, *does*) defeat the whole purpose! - (CRConrad) - (3) - Feb. 27, 2004, 07:01:59 PM EST

ICLRPD (new thread) - (drewk) - Feb. 29, 2004, 12:25:47 AM EST

Re: But that would (i.e, *does*) defeat the whole purpose! - (dshellman) - (1) - March 1, 2004, 07:37:54 AM EST

Sorry, either I don't get your meaning, or you didn't mine. - (CRConrad) - March 1, 2004, 09:10:07 AM EST

What ends up happening ... - (bluke) - (5) - Feb. 29, 2004, 01:33:07 AM EST

Re: What ends up happening ... - (dshellman) - (4) - March 1, 2004, 07:38:49 AM EST

Re: What ends up happening ... - (tuberculosis) - March 1, 2004, 12:18:27 PM EST

You didn't answer the question ... - (bluke) - (2) - March 1, 2004, 03:02:14 PM EST

Re: You didn't answer the question ... - (dshellman) - (1) - March 2, 2004, 09:13:43 AM EST

A number of comments - (bluke) - March 3, 2004, 05:05:16 AM EST

We already discussed this - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Feb. 27, 2004, 06:38:32 PM EST

Re: We already discussed this - (dshellman) - (7) - March 1, 2004, 07:25:21 AM EST

Blame the tool - (tuberculosis) - March 1, 2004, 12:27:25 PM EST

You're right, that is unfortunate - (ben_tilly) - (5) - March 1, 2004, 02:46:24 PM EST

Re: You're right, that is unfortunate - (dshellman) - (4) - March 2, 2004, 09:23:49 AM EST

You have to balance benefit/cost - (ben_tilly) - (3) - March 3, 2004, 11:28:42 AM EST

s/Knuth/Dijkstra/ - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - March 3, 2004, 10:45:32 PM EST

I had it right the first time - (ben_tilly) - (1) - March 3, 2004, 10:49:38 PM EST

I stand corrected then. - (a6l6e6x) - March 3, 2004, 11:06:24 PM EST

Re: Because checked exceptions are STOOPID! - (dshellman) - (8) - March 1, 2004, 01:07:30 PM EST

Hmm... - (CRConrad) - March 1, 2004, 04:30:13 PM EST

One phrase says it all. - (Arkadiy) - (6) - March 1, 2004, 04:44:39 PM EST

Caught my eye too - (tuberculosis) - March 1, 2004, 07:07:04 PM EST

Re: One phrase says it all. - (dshellman) - (4) - March 2, 2004, 09:04:06 AM EST

I remain unconvinced - (tuberculosis) - March 2, 2004, 09:47:13 AM EST

A Further Question on the Code Example - (JimWeirich) - (1) - March 2, 2004, 01:20:53 PM EST

Re: A Further Question on the Code Example - (dshellman) - March 2, 2004, 02:59:24 PM EST

Bad for class libraries? - (Arkadiy) - March 3, 2004, 07:44:09 AM EST

Re: Ditto. - (JimWeirich) - Feb. 26, 2004, 05:17:05 PM EST

I meant Exception the class - (bluke) - (7) - Feb. 26, 2004, 03:51:29 PM EST

Don't catch null pointer exceptions? - (JimWeirich) - (6) - Feb. 26, 2004, 05:14:57 PM EST

In development yes - (bluke) - (5) - Feb. 27, 2004, 01:02:37 AM EST

Re: In development yes - (JimWeirich) - (4) - Feb. 27, 2004, 12:35:18 PM EST

Agreed - (bluke) - (3) - Feb. 29, 2004, 01:25:04 AM EST

So wouldn't the remedy be... - (CRConrad) - (2) - Feb. 29, 2004, 04:03:57 PM EST

cf. Spring Framework :-) -NT - (admin) - Feb. 29, 2004, 04:51:06 PM EST

I agree ... - (bluke) - March 1, 2004, 05:36:33 AM EST

Another reason to catch specifics - (jb4) - Feb. 27, 2004, 05:49:20 PM EST

"Static factory methods", constructors - what's the diff? - (CRConrad) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2004, 10:23:58 AM EST

Inheritance. - (admin) - Feb. 25, 2004, 11:34:53 AM EST

Static factories vs. constructors - (dshellman) - Feb. 25, 2004, 04:29:44 PM EST

Constructor with 29 parameters - (bluke) - (20) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:08:55 AM EST

**boggle** - (deSitter) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:10:52 AM EST

Depending on the language... - (admin) - (12) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:40:30 AM EST

LRPD - (deSitter) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:44:12 AM EST

This is written in Java - (bluke) - (5) - Feb. 24, 2004, 09:57:33 AM EST

Nasty. -NT - (admin) - Feb. 24, 2004, 10:13:40 AM EST

Brings back bad memories - (deSitter) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 10:44:47 AM EST

Interesting point - (bluke) - Feb. 24, 2004, 02:53:01 PM EST

Re: Is written in Java? - (dlevitt) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 04:48:46 PM EST

Yes, by people with C/C++ (MFC) experience -NT - (bluke) - Feb. 25, 2004, 02:42:31 AM EST

Two points - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Feb. 24, 2004, 11:48:24 PM EST

Re: Two points - well, you're half right. - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2004, 08:41:28 AM EST

"Static factory methods", constructors - what's the diff? (new thread) - (CRConrad) - Feb. 25, 2004, 10:23:58 AM EST

You're right... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2004, 07:54:45 PM EST

Not required in Java. - (admin) - Feb. 26, 2004, 12:09:33 AM EST

29 parameters, all positional? - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 10:59:26 AM EST

You got it - (bluke) - Feb. 24, 2004, 11:24:06 AM EST

Kill the author - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2004, 02:26:27 PM EST

No one there would understand - (bluke) - Feb. 24, 2004, 02:53:53 PM EST

A dictionary array is nice for such -NT - (tablizer) - Feb. 25, 2004, 12:00:23 AM EST

Try partial application wrappers? -NT - (FuManChu) - Feb. 25, 2004, 03:57:45 AM EST

Looks like I hit a bug in Visual Work - (Arkadiy) - (4) - Feb. 23, 2004, 07:35:45 PM EST

Zoink! Another Cpuspus default constructor screwup! -NT - (deSitter) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2004, 08:08:00 PM EST

What the hell is wrong with you? - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2004, 08:53:07 PM EST

Sorry, didn't see that :) - (deSitter) - Feb. 23, 2004, 08:59:28 PM EST

You should post this to the VW users list - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 25, 2004, 09:20:16 AM EST

Welcome to IWETHEY!