Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWeThey++
- (
jake123)
- (24)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 07:45:51 AM EDT
Congrats.
-NT
- (
jbrabeck)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 08:04:15 AM EDT
Excellent. :-) Try to network while you're there.
-NT
- (
Another Scott)
- (3)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 08:24:04 AM EDT
No....
- (
jake123)
- (2)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 07:34:58 PM EDT
They don't call me **Obvious Man** for nothing. :-)
-NT
- (
Another Scott)
- (1)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 08:19:51 PM EDT
You *CHARGE* them to call you "Obvious Man"?
- (
lincoln)
- Aug. 13, 2006, 03:16:17 PM EDT
Good to hear
-NT
- (
JayMehaffey)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 08:55:03 AM EDT
Good deal.
-NT
- (
admin)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 09:15:55 AM EDT
Gratumalations.
-NT
- (
Yendor)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 09:26:40 AM EDT
Woot!
-NT
- (
a6l6e6x)
- (1)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 09:46:02 AM EDT
And yay!
-NT
- (
drewk)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 10:26:52 AM EDT
Temporary or not...
- (
folkert)
- (1)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 09:52:19 AM EDT
I've already started seeing those effects
- (
jake123)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 07:35:57 PM EDT
woot!
-NT
- (
boxley)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 10:18:55 AM EDT
hurray!
-NT
- (
SpiceWare)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 10:56:01 AM EDT
XLNT!
-NT
- (
imric)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 11:35:12 AM EDT
Cheers from this corner. Hip Hip Hooray!
-NT
- (
lincoln)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 11:57:14 AM EDT
Yay! Go you.
-NT
- (
Silverlock)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 12:06:31 PM EDT
'grats!
-NT
- (
Steve Lowe)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 12:22:21 PM EDT
Great news! Hang in there!
-NT
- (
Nightowl)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 02:19:10 PM EDT
Home Run Jack!
-NT
- (
imqwerky)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 02:30:38 PM EDT
Re: IWeThey++
- (
Ashton)
- Aug. 12, 2006, 04:37:12 AM EDT
Groovy.
-NT
- (
inthane-chan)
- Aug. 12, 2006, 11:57:09 AM EDT
good goo, that's how it starts
-NT
- (
cforde)
- Aug. 13, 2006, 06:19:23 PM EDT
YESSSSS!
- (
jb4)
- Aug. 15, 2006, 03:12:15 PM EDT
I am SCREWED
- (
broomberg)
- (71)
- Aug. 9, 2006, 11:28:33 PM EDT
:-( Get him a copy of UltraEdit.
- (
Another Scott)
- (16)
- Aug. 9, 2006, 11:44:53 PM EDT
UltraEdit is great
- (
cforde)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:40:00 AM EDT
UE costs money.
- (
pwhysall)
- (2)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 08:11:17 AM EDT
OT: Shouldn't you be on your honeymoon?
-NT
- (
Yendor)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 08:40:50 AM EDT
he's gotta come up for air once in a while. ;-j
-NT
- (
jbrabeck)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 08:05:12 AM EDT
That is one of the current Win choices.
- (
broomberg)
- (11)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 11:14:10 AM EDT
nano?
- (
Another Scott)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 11:22:57 AM EDT
Install requested
- (
broomberg)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:28:26 PM EDT
I use nano as my default editor.
- (
folkert)
- (8)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:29:22 PM EDT
Hmmm
- (
broomberg)
- (7)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:41:08 PM EDT
No "undo"
- (
broomberg)
- (5)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:01:34 PM EDT
Try this
- (
drewk)
- (2)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:04:09 PM EDT
I've played with cream
- (
broomberg)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:13:24 PM EDT
I won't respond to that post
- (
drewk)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:14:05 PM EDT
Undo is only necessary for htose who make mistaeks.
- (
Another Scott)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:18:43 PM EDT
You can force it to be the default
- (
folkert)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:54:07 PM EDT
No, I use them all. I am not a programmer.
- (
folkert)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 03:09:45 PM EDT
Never "learned" vi, eh? I like him already!
- (
jb4)
- (50)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 09:46:17 AM EDT
Sigh
- (
broomberg)
- (49)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 11:24:25 AM EDT
Well...
- (
jb4)
- (37)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:22:03 PM EDT
I think auto-complete is a macro
- (
drewk)
- (36)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 11:50:34 AM EDT
Depends on who you ask
- (
jb4)
- (13)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:23:37 PM EDT
So have them fix it
- (
broomberg)
- (3)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:42:41 PM EDT
Yeah...comma...right
- (
jb4)
- (2)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:08:21 PM EDT
Sigh
- (
broomberg)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:16:44 PM EDT
I don't make large edits on these systems
- (
jb4)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 03:50:03 PM EDT
Is vim the windows version of vi?
- (
Nightowl)
- (8)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 02:23:29 PM EDT
Nope, 'vim' is 'vi, improved'
- (
drewk)
- (7)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 02:35:10 PM EDT
I seem to have both kinds
- (
Nightowl)
- (6)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 02:50:41 PM EDT
If it has multiple levels of 'undo' it's probably vim
-NT
- (
drewk)
- (5)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 02:55:26 PM EDT
Hmmm I only know of one undo command.
- (
Nightowl)
- (4)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 03:08:10 PM EDT
What's the command you use to start it?
- (
jake123)
- (3)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 07:37:30 PM EDT
vi :)
- (
Nightowl)
- (2)
- Aug. 12, 2006, 12:08:55 PM EDT
Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"...
- (
jb4)
- (1)
- Aug. 15, 2006, 03:08:41 PM EDT
Re: Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"...
- (
Nightowl)
- Aug. 16, 2006, 02:32:36 AM EDT
Yes, I mean vim
- (
broomberg)
- (21)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:25:05 PM EDT
Was I right about that being a plugin?
- (
drewk)
- (20)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:35:37 PM EDT
No idea
- (
broomberg)
- (19)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 01:44:20 PM EDT
Hmm, gvim vs vim
- (
drewk)
- (18)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:02:46 PM EDT
I prefer gvim
- (
broomberg)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:15:25 PM EDT
No law says you have to use a mouse and scroolbars
- (
jb4)
- (16)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 03:53:36 PM EDT
:7000<ENTER> or 7000G
-NT
- (
broomberg)
- (2)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 04:59:30 PM EDT
But the day goes faster hitting Page Down 200x. ;-)
-NT
- (
Another Scott)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 05:01:30 PM EDT
Assuming, of course, that you know the target line...
- (
jb4)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 05:07:21 PM EDT
No, that's not what I was going to say
- (
drewk)
- (11)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 05:20:44 PM EDT
I've seen enough of them.
- (
admin)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 05:22:32 PM EDT
Here
- (
broomberg)
- (7)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 06:20:39 PM EDT
And the last time you needed to edit /etc/termcap was...?
-NT
- (
Yendor)
- (6)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 06:34:12 PM EDT
About 21 years ago
- (
broomberg)
- (5)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 06:49:46 PM EDT
YPB
-NT
- (
hnick)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 07:00:14 PM EDT
Wasn't so bad.
- (
broomberg)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 07:15:49 PM EDT
I think the term would be "pathological example"
- (
drewk)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 05:05:33 PM EDT
Oops, time travelling on the reboot
- (
drewk)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 10:25:23 AM EDT
No, really, that's what happened
- (
drewk)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 10:25:48 AM EDT
10K lines? Pshaw.
- (
pwhysall)
- (1)
- Aug. 11, 2006, 03:01:08 AM EDT
Yes, I **did** know that.
- (
jb4)
- Aug. 15, 2006, 03:10:51 PM EDT
That's what incremental search is for...
-NT
- (
admin)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 05:22:12 PM EDT
Emacs.
- (
admin)
- (10)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 11:50:13 AM EDT
You can do that in vi, too
- (
drewk)
- (9)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 11:54:26 AM EDT
I don't see that in the man page.
- (
admin)
- (4)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:26:49 PM EDT
Nope, it's a plugin
- (
drewk)
- (3)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:38:20 PM EDT
Looks somewhat similar
- (
admin)
- (2)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:44:37 PM EDT
Yeah, it's not as general-purpose
- (
drewk)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:55:09 PM EDT
Right.
- (
admin)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:57:19 PM EDT
nano can edit files on remote machines...
- (
folkert)
- (3)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:27:34 PM EDT
Emacs is as simple as you make it.
- (
admin)
- (2)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:32:21 PM EDT
"Modal == teh sukc" for newbies, indeedly do.
- (
folkert)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 12:55:19 PM EDT
What bad habits would they be? (new thread)
- (
static)
- Aug. 14, 2006, 01:10:34 AM EDT
why cant he use the xeditor on solaris?
-NT
- (
boxley)
- (1)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 02:27:08 PM EDT
'X' - not character mode
-NT
- (
broomberg)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 05:02:43 PM EDT
Emacs with CUA Mode?
- (
altmann)
- Aug. 10, 2006, 06:19:38 PM EDT
interesting want ad
- (
boxley)
- (9)
- Aug. 3, 2006, 06:14:29 PM EDT
Sounds like an opening at our DR site
-NT
- (
jbrabeck)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 06:57:25 AM EDT
Do you know what the last line means?
- (
lincoln)
- (7)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 05:07:15 PM EDT
I'm glad you asked that.
- (
imqwerky)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 05:22:32 PM EDT
Cryptanalysis comes to the conclusion of:
- (
ChrisR)
- (3)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 06:21:42 PM EDT
Oh No! It's a stupid Ad! Where's my BB Gun!
-NT
- (
Another Scott)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 06:27:38 PM EDT
Which analisys method was used?
- (
folkert)
- (1)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 10:47:16 PM EDT
vowel substitution, e being most common
-NT
- (
boxley)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 10:48:06 PM EDT
This is not ROT 18?
- (
Silverlock)
- (1)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 09:22:52 PM EDT
Not even ROT25
- (
folkert)
- Aug. 4, 2006, 10:48:32 PM EDT
Well, it ain't NASA
- (
drewk)
- (8)
- July 25, 2006, 01:14:02 PM EDT
C++ and STL?
- (
admin)
- (6)
- July 25, 2006, 02:30:58 PM EDT
Re: C++ and STL?
- (
pwhysall)
- (1)
- July 25, 2006, 05:41:33 PM EDT
Ar.
-NT
- (
admin)
- July 25, 2006, 08:36:42 PM EDT
Who cares? It's putting s**t in space?
- (
drewk)
- (3)
- July 25, 2006, 05:55:05 PM EDT
Spoken like someone who's obviously never done them
- (
admin)
- (2)
- July 25, 2006, 08:37:32 PM EDT
Sorry
- (
imric)
- (1)
- July 25, 2006, 09:18:52 PM EDT
ICLRPD (new thread)
- (
imqwerky)
- July 25, 2006, 11:05:34 PM EDT
I already work for that guy
- (
tuberculosis)
- Aug. 5, 2006, 03:13:05 AM EDT
Made a coworker cry today
- (
broomberg)
- (7)
- June 23, 2006, 10:12:55 PM EDT
My world view has changed, knowing you.
- (
folkert)
- June 23, 2006, 10:17:17 PM EDT
You're a good man
- (
Silverlock)
- June 23, 2006, 10:21:08 PM EDT
Excellent. Well said.
-NT
- (
Another Scott)
- June 23, 2006, 10:25:26 PM EDT
I would've cried too.
- (
imqwerky)
- June 23, 2006, 10:26:20 PM EDT
That's beautiful
-NT
- (
ben_tilly)
- June 23, 2006, 10:46:43 PM EDT
very nice
- (
cforde)
- (1)
- June 24, 2006, 01:34:47 AM EDT
I gave her the paper I read from
-NT
- (
broomberg)
- June 24, 2006, 09:11:35 AM EDT
Project Typists Needed !
- (
fayyazmrka)
- (4)
- June 20, 2006, 07:16:43 PM EDT
Spam
- (
jake123)
- (2)
- June 20, 2006, 07:34:40 PM EDT
tell us how you *really* feel...
-NT
- (
n3jja)
- June 20, 2006, 07:40:17 PM EDT
Not really.
- (
admin)
- June 20, 2006, 07:57:24 PM EDT
Cool!
- (
Silverlock)
- June 20, 2006, 11:58:57 PM EDT
anyone looking in Atlanta?
- (
boxley)
- (7)
- June 19, 2006, 12:56:39 PM EDT
Interesting timing
- (
broomberg)
- (6)
- June 19, 2006, 09:54:49 PM EDT
Wow, thought you were going to say *you* were in the market
- (
drewk)
- (5)
- June 20, 2006, 08:46:58 AM EDT
All I can say to that is...
- (
folkert)
- (2)
- June 20, 2006, 03:38:49 PM EDT
Gives "back-stabbing bastard" a whole new meaning
-NT
- (
drewk)
- (1)
- June 20, 2006, 09:10:50 AM EDT
All for one and well, all for one!
-NT
- (
imqwerky)
- June 20, 2006, 01:17:13 PM EDT
I'd love it
- (
broomberg)
- June 20, 2006, 11:30:49 PM EDT
Oh, and a couple of weeks ago I thought I was
- (
broomberg)
- June 20, 2006, 11:38:05 PM EDT
Today’s program has been sponsored by the physical act of gulping. For thousands of years, gulping has been there for human beings when they needed an expressive gesture of the throat. Whether you want to indicate nervousness about an upcoming test or appointment, fear of the Faceless Old Woman Who Secretly Lives in Your Home, or you just want to ingest milk faster than with regular swallowing, gulping is the way to go! Forget sweating, never mind shivering! Sneezing? Ugh! When you think physical actions, think gulping! Gulp now and receive a complimentary prize package, which will be conveniently buried in an unmarked spot somewhere in the Scrublands. Find it, and it’s yours!
1,116 ms